SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.49 número146Commanding and Defining. On Eugenio Bulygin’s Theory of Legal Power-Conferring RulesOn Some Objections to The Deductive Closure of Legal Systems índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Crítica (México, D.F.)

versão impressa ISSN 0011-1503

Resumo

SCATAGLINI, María Gabriela. Bulygin-redondo: desencuentros cercanos sobre enunciados Hartianos del tercer tipo. Crítica (Méx., D.F.) [online]. 2017, vol.49, n.146, pp.107-123.  Epub 23-Abr-2020. ISSN 0011-1503.  https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2017.183.

In this text I compare Eugenio Bulygin’s and Cristina Redondo’s conceptions about those statements that register the fact that members of a society accept some rules as guides for their behavior. I inquire into what makes it possible for the observer to identify or recognize valid legal rules as such, and my answer is inspired by Wittgenstein’s rule-following considerations, taken up from Brandom’s critique against “regularism”. I concur with Redondo on those points where she is in disagreement with Bulygin, although I express a slight but crucial difference with Redondo’s position.

Palavras-chave : internal point of view; descriptive/prescriptive; rule-following; observer; “regularism”.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol