1. Introduction
The Zn-Pb-Ag(-W) skarn deposits at Zacatepec, also named Mɨɨygɨxy (in Mixe, or Ayüük, language), are located between the Zacatepec and Jayacaxtepec villages in the Sierra de Juárez, about 80 km east-northeast of Oaxaca city in southern Mexico. Part of the mineralization is known as the Niño Perdido prospect, and no mining works exist other than small prospecting galleries in these deposits. Geological studies in this region are scarce due to accessibility problems (both natural and social; see Canet et al., 2011), therefore the lithological units are poorly constrained in age. The studied deposits are located in the highlands of the traditional territory of the Mixe or Ayüükj’ä’äy indigenous group, the so-called Mixe District. This locality is found within the easternmost regions of the Sierra Madre del Sur, in central-northeastern Oaxaca, which is a region that is dominantly occupied by middle Miocene volcanic rocks (Figure 1; see also Figure 3 in Martínez-Serrano et al., 2008). The middle Miocene volcanic event represents the last major volcanic activity in the Sierra Madre del Sur (Morán-Zenteno et al., 2005, 2007; Nieto-Samaniegoet al., 2006) although there is synchronicity at some extent between this volcanic event and the earliest stages of the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt (Martínez-Serrano et al., 2008).
The polymetallic skarns in this area formed between Lower Cretaceous carbonate rocks (probably of the Sierra Madre Formation) and Cenozoic monzonitic to granitic rocks (Canet et al., 2011). The latter are plutonic or hypabyssal intrusive rocks, but undertaking any detailed mapping has not been possible; therefore, the exact dimensions and shape of such intrusive rocks remain unknown. Ore-bearing associations due to skarns in the Zacatepec area occur as irregular masses along the contact between the Cretaceous limestones and Cenozoic porphyritic dacites or in their vicinities (see Figure 1 in Canet et al., 2011).
The data below summarize the metallogenic characteristics of these deposits, as indicated by Canet et al. (2011). For the most part, the prograde mineralization consists in skarns of calcic garnet with disseminated hematite, whereas skarns rich in calcic clinopyroxenes locally occur, farther from the contact between the porphyry and the limestones. As a result of a retrograde event, ore mineral assemblages containing sphalerite, galena, chalcopyrite, besides minor scheelite, vikingite and an unknown Ag3BiS3phase (probably a mineral of the aikinite group) were formed. Locally, magnesian skarns yield the highest metal grades. Microthermometric studies of fluid inclusions allowed to determine temperatures of homogenization between 160° and 470 °C, and salinities between 10.5 and 19.8 wt.% NaCl equiv. The temperature of formation of the prograde skarn, calculated from microthermometric data with an assumed pressure of 500 bar, ranges between 470° and 510 °C. The formation of the retrograde assemblage implies a decrease in temperature and, initially, in salinity, coupled with a great increase in ƒO2. These changes can be explained by mixing with cooler, oxidizing and dilute meteoric water. Subsequently, a progressive increase in fluid salinity as temperatures of homogenization dropped from 300°C suggests that boiling took place triggering sulfide precipitation.
The formation of polymetallic skarn deposits in the Zacatepec area was attributed by Canet et al. (2011) to be associated with the magmatism of the Sierra Madre del Sur. The present paper aims to better constrain the age of these deposits and the magmatic rocks with which they are genetically associated, as both Paleogene (Eocene-Oligocene) and Miocene magmatic rocks are present in the study region (see Figure 3 inMartínez-Serranoet al., 2008). Subsequently, this paper also aims to raise awareness on the latest metallogenic stages of the Sierra Madre del Sur, an issue that is formally addressed for the first time.
This paper also contributes to a dating program for Mexican mineral deposits that includes several types (Camprubí et al., 2015, 2016a, 2016b, 2018; Farfán-Panamá et al., 2015; Martínez-Reyes et al., 2015; Enríquez et al., 2018).
2. Methods and results
The40Ar/39Ar analyses were performed at the Geochronology Laboratory of the Departmento de Geología, Centro de Investigación Científica y Educación Superior de Ensenada (CICESE, Baja California, Mexico). The argon isotope experiments were conducted on hornblende and biotite fragments separated from sample SP-120 (granitoid). The mineral grains were heated with a Coherent Ar-ion Innova 370 laser.
The extraction system is online with a VG5400 mass spectrometer. The sample and irradiation monitors, were irradiated in the U-enriched research reactor of University of McMaster in Hamilton, Canada, at position 5C. To block thermal neutrons, the capsule was covered with a cadmium liner during irradiation. To determine the neutron flux variations, aliquots of the irradiation monitor FCT sanidine (28.201 ± 0.046 Ma; Kuiperet al., 2008) were irradiated alongside sample SP-120. Upon irradiation the monitors were fused in one step while the fuchsite sample SP-120 was step-heated. The argon isotopes were corrected for blank, mass discrimination, radioactive decay of37Ar and39Ar and atmospheric contamination. For the Ca neutron interference reactions, the factors given by Masliwec (1984) were used. The decay constants recommended by Steiger and Jäger (1977) were applied in the data processing. The equations reported by York et al. (2004) were used in all the straight line fitting routines of the argon data reduction. The relevant40Ar/39Ar data are presented in Table 1, which includes the results of the individual steps, and the integrated, plateau and isochron ages. The analytical precision is reported as one standard deviation (1 σ). The error in the integrated, plateau and isochron ages includes the scatter in the irradiation monitors.
Pwr | 39 Ar x 10 -6 | F39Ar | 40 Ar*/ 39 ArK | Age in Ma | %40Ar* | 40 Ar/ 36 Ar | 37 ArCa/ 39 ArK | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.4 | 105.907 | 0.0676 | 2.73 ± 0.37 | 16.40 ± 2.22 | a | 5.95 | 314.21 | 0.512 | |
0.75 | 242.377 | 0.1546 | 3.49 ± 0.16 | 20.98 ± 0.95 | b | 18.91 | 364.42 | 0.766 | |
1.05 | 153.608 | 0.098 | 2.55 ± 0.16 | 15.31 ± 0.94 | c | 25.33 | 395.72 | 2.674 | |
1.5 | 545.035 | 0.3476 | 2.98 ± 0.09 | 17.89 ± 0.57 | d | 54.83 | 654.21 | 5.289 | |
2 | 269.816 | 0.1721 | 2.99 ± 0.14 | 17.96 ± 0.82 | e | 63.13 | 801.4 | 2.353 | |
2.7 | 196.94 | 0.1256 | 2.10 ± 0.09 | 12.64 ± 0.52 | f | ‡ | 41.35 | 503.8 | 3.846 |
4 | 54.135 | 0.0345 | 2.78 ± 0.56 | 16.68 ± 3.35 | g | 39.84 | 491.2 | 3.296 |
39 Ar x 10 -6 | 40 Ar*/ 39 ArK | Age in Ma | % 40Ar* | 40 Ar/ 36 Ar | 37 Ar Ca / 39 Ar |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1568 | 2.88 ± 0.07 | 17.33 ± 0.40 | 27.41 | 407.08 | 3.255 |
Pwr | 39 Ar x 10 -6 | F39Ar | 40 Ar*/ 39 ArK | Age in Ma | % 40Ar* | 40 Ar/ 36 Ar | 37 Ar Ca / 39 ArK | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.65 | 95.3807 | 0.0156 | 2.25 ± 0.68 | 13.51 ± 4.05 | h | 14.18 | 344.31 | 0.248 |
1 | 215.904 | 0.0352 | 2.39 ± 0.22 | 14.38 ± 1.33 | i | 20.51 | 371.73 | 0.071 |
1.4 | 278.727 | 0.0454 | 2.80 ± 0.12 | 16.85 ± 0.72 | j | 60.13 | 741.16 | 0.018 |
1.9 | 520.263 | 0.0848 | 2.87 ± 0.05 | 17.24 ± 0.29 | k | 70.21 | 992.03 | 0.054 |
2.5 | 767.066 | 0.1251 | 2.97 ± 0.06 | 17.86 ± 0.36 | l | 79.88 | 1469.03 | 0.062 |
3 | 614.501 | 0.1002 | 2.92 ± 0.04 | 17.51 ± 0.27 | m | 82.17 | 1657.23 | 0.082 |
3.5 | 1026.31 | 0.1673 | 2.95 ± 0.04 | 17.72 ± 0.23 | n | 85.33 | 2014.73 | 0.077 |
4 | 743.651 | 0.1213 | 2.99 ± 0.05 | 17.93 ± 0.30 | o | 86.49 | 2186.61 | 0.056 |
4.5 | 676.223 | 0.1103 | 2.96 ± 0.04 | 17.78 ± 0.26 | p | 87.38 | 2340.6 | 0.043 |
5.15 | 510.554 | 0.0833 | 3.00 ± 0.05 | 18.01 ± 0.30 | q | 90.55 | 3128.54 | 0.027 |
6.5 | 684.144 | 0.1116 | 2.96 ± 0.05 | 17.78 ± 0.31 | r | 88.2 | 2503.47 | 0.019 |
39 Ar x 10 -6 | 40 Ar*/ 39 ArK | Age in Ma | % 40Ar* | 40 Ar/ 36 Ar | 37 Ar Ca / 39 Ar |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6133 | 2.92 ± 0.02 | 17.52 ± 0.14 | 71.86 | 1050.28 | 0.057 |
J = 0.003347 ± 0.000006
‡ fraction ignored in the isochron given in Figure 2
The plateau age was calculated with the weighted mean of fractions k to r
tp= 17.72 ± 0.19 Ma, 90.38 % of39Ar released in 8 consecutive fractions, MSWD = 0.69
The dated sample (SP-120) comes from a granitoid body that is associated with prograde skarn mineralization in the area of Zacatepec, northeastern Oaxaca. The40Ar/39Ar results are listed in Table 1 and presented in Figure 2. The analyzed sample yielded an isochron age at 17.52 ± 0.14 Ma for biotite and an isochron age at 17.33 ± 0.40 Ma for hornblende (early Miocene).
3. Discussion
The40Ar/39Ar ages obtained in this study for a prograde skarn-related granitoid in the Zacatepec-Jayacaxtepec area (17.52 ± 0.14 and 17.33 ± 0.40 Ma), correspond to the early Miocene. Rhyolitic tuffs in the area yielded40Ar/39Ar ages at 15.48 ± 0.02 Ma (Iriondoet al., 2004) that may mark the minimum age for such skarn-type mineralization. Ore deposits of this age have been traditionally bypassed for the easternmost regions of the Sierra Madre del Sur (notice their scarcity in the review by Camprubí, 2013). This emphasizes the need for further metallogenetic studies in Oaxaca. Such ages are in accordance with the last volcanic event of the Sierra Madre del Sur before its activity waned (Morán-Zenteno et al., 2005, 2007; Nieto-Samaniegoet al., 2006; Martínez-Serrano et al., 2008). Intrusive rocks in the study area, within the Sierra de Juárez region, have been generally attributed Paleogene ages (see Figure 3 in Martínez-Serrano et al., 2008). Miocene intrusive rocks in the Sierra Madre del Sur are generally to be found in the coastal batholiths of southeastern Oaxaca, and Miocene volcanic rocks are widespread inland in central Oaxaca (Figure 1). However, other mineralized areas in central-eastern Oaxaca may have similar ages to those in the Zacatepec-Jayacaxtepec region. Such areas are Natividad in Ixtlán de Juárez, Cobre Grande in San Baltazar Guelavila, Altagracia-Águila-Arista near San José de Gracia, Taviche and Lachigalla near Ejutla de Crespo, Santa Margarita-Azucena near Nejapa, Aurena near Santa Cruz Bamba, and Guielavazar in Santa María Guienagati (Table 2 and Figure 3).
Locality | Mineral | Rock | Method | Age (Ma) | References | Association with known one deposit |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Volcanic rocks | ||||||
Totolapa | Volcanic matrix | Andesite | 40Ar/39Ar | 22.31±0.03 | Iriondo et al . (2004) | Host rocks to the Taviche and Lachigalla Au-Ag and polymetallic epithernal deposits |
Volcanic matrix | Andesite | 40Ar/39Ar | 17.51±0.05 | |||
Plagioclase | Andesite | 40Ar/39Ar | 17.09±0.06 | |||
Suchilquitongo-Etla | Biotite | Ignimbrite | K-Ar | 20.3±0.4 | Ferrusquía-Villafranca and McDowell (1991) | |
Plagioclase | Tuff | K-Ar | 19.2±0.5 | |||
Near Totolapa | WR | Rhyolitic vitrophyre | K-Ar | 19.6±0.5 | Martínez-Serrano et al . (2008) | |
Magdalena Apaxco | Plagioclas | Ignimbrite | K-Ar | 19.3±0.5 | Ferrusquía-Villafranca et al . (1974) | |
Huizto-Etla | Biotite | Tuff | K-Ar | 16.95±0.3 | Ferrusquía-Villafranca et al . (1974) | |
Guichixu | Plagioclase | Rhyodacitic tuff | K-Ar | 16.92±0.40 | Ferrusquía-Villafranca (1999) | |
Yautepec | Unspecified | Ignimbrite | K-Ar | 16.1±0.0 | Ferrusquía-Villafranca and McDowell (1991) | |
Tlacolula-Mitla- Matatlán | Biotite | Tuff | K-Ar | 16.0±0.8 | Ferrusquía-Villafranca and McDowell (1991) | Host rocks to the Natividad polymetallic epithermal deposits |
Plagioclase | Tuff | K-Ar | 15.3±0.8 | |||
Nejapa | Plagioclase | Tuff | K-Ar | 15.82±0.37 | Ferrusquía-Villafranca and McDowell (1991) | Host rocks to the Altagracia-Águila-Arista polymetallic epithermal deposits |
Plagioclase | Tuff | K-Ar | 15.78±0.37 | |||
Plagioclase | Tuff | K-Ar | 14.96±0.85 | |||
San Pedro Quiatoni | Biotite | Rhyiolitic tuff | 40Ar/39Ar | 15.48±0.02 | Iriondo et al . (2004) | |
7 km NW of Santiago Laollaga | Biotite | Dacitic tuff | K-Ar | 14.74±0.23 | Ferrusquía-Villafranca (1999) | |
Plagioclase | Dacitic tuff | K-Ar | 3.46±0.32 | |||
Tlacolula, Oaxaca | Plagioclase, biotite | Ignimbrite | K-Ar | 14.5 | Ferrusquía-Villafranca and McDowell (1991) | |
Santiago Zacatepec | Hornblende | Andesite | 40Ar/39Ar | 15.48±0.02 | Iriondo et al . (2004) | Capping rocks to the Niño Perdido polymetallic skarn (?) |
Laollaga | Unspecified | Ignimbrite | K-Ar | 15 | Ferrusquía-Villafranca and McDowell (1991) | |
Hypabyssal rocks | ||||||
Santiago Zacatepec | Biotite | Granitic porphyry | 40Ar/39Ar | 17.52±0.14 | This work | Porphyry associated with prograde mineralization in the Niño Perdido polymetallic skarn |
Hornblende | Granitic porphyry | 40Ar/39Ar | 17.33±0.40 | |||
7 km NE of Guelavilla | Zircon | Diorite | U-Pb | 16.7±0.6 | Poliquin (2009) | Intrusive rocks associated with prograde mineralization to the Cobre Grande skarn and host rocks to porphyry (?) Cu-Mo deposits |
Coastal batholith | ||||||
S of Cozoaltepec river | Zircon | Granodiorite | U-Pb | 27.5±0.5 | Keppie et al . (2012) | |
1 km NW of Taragundi | Zircon | Diorite | U-Pb | 23.8±0.4 | Poliquin (2009) | Host rocks to the Cerro Colorado Au epithermal deposit |
Salina Cruz (Juchitian) | Amphibole | Mylonitized granite | K-Ar | 17±1 | Solé et al . (2007) | Associated with the formation of the Potrerillo porphyry Cu-Au deposit and the La Esperanza porphyry Cu-Ag deposit?? |
Biotite | Granodiorite | K-Ar | 14±1 | |||
Bomba | Biotite-WR | Granite | Rb-Sr | 16.6±0.3 | Solís-Pichardo (written communication) | Intrusive rocks associated with prograde mineralization to the Aurena Au-Ag skarn |
Guevea de Humboldt | Zircon | Diorite | U-Pb | 16.0±1.2 | Pérez-Gutiérrez (2010) | |
Juárez | Biotite-WR | Quartz-diorite | Rb-Sr | 14.9±0.3 | Solís-Pichardo (written communication) | Intrusive rocks associated with prograde mineralization to the Santa Margarita-Azucena Cu-Fe skarn and host to Au-Ag epithermal mineralization |
Biotite-WR | Tonalite | Rb-Sr | 13.6±0.3 | |||
Santa María Guienagati | Plagioclase | Diabase | K-Ar | 15.16±0.075 | Ferrusquía-Villafranca (1999) | Host rocks to the Guielavazar polymetallic epithermal deposit |
Biotite | Diabase | K-Ar | 14.92±0.24 | |||
Pyroxene | Diabase | K-Ar | 13.01±0.76 |
Key: WR = whole rock.
All ages for the deposits above are estimated in relation to the ages of their host rocks, as follows below. These are directly equivalent to ages of part of the ore deposits only when the dated hypabyssal rocks are responsible for prograde mineralization in skarns-the remaining ages can only be considered as maximum ages for the emplacement of the ore deposits hosted by them:
●. The host volcanic rocks to the Taviche Au-Ag-Zn-Pb (Taviche, El Cubilete, El Carmen-San Ignacio, La Altona, Verónica-San Juan, San Martin, San Jorge-Colmena and Los Ocotes veins) and the Lachigalla Au-Ag epithermal deposits were dated at 22.31 ± 0.03 Ma (Iriondo et al., 2004). Thus, plausible ages for these deposits are <22.31 Ma.
●. The Cobre Grande project comprises Cu-Zn-Pb-Au skarn, Cu-Mo stockworks and Au mineralization associated with argillic alteration (possible porphyry-type deposits?). A host dioritic intrusive for stockwork mineralization was dated at 23.8 ± 0.4 Ma in the Cerro Colorado area and a quartz-diorite associated with prograde stages was dated at 16.7 ± 0.6 Ma for the Cobre Grande skarn (Poliquin, 2009); overlying volcanic rocks were dated at 15.48 ± 0.02 Ma (Iriondo et al., 2004). Thus, plausible ages for hydrothermal mineralization at the Cobre Grande skarn and porphyry-type mineralization range between <23.8 and ≤16.7 Ma.
●. The Aurena deposit, an Au-Ag skarn, is associated with granodioritic to granitic hypabyssal rocks dated at 16.6 ± 0.3 Ma (G. Solís-Pichardo, written communication). Thus, plausible ages for this deposit are ≤16.6 Ma.
●. The Natividad Ag-Au and base metal epithermal deposits (El Águila, Yagalán, La Valenciana, La Aurora, Mina Vieja and La Plata I veins) postdate hypabyssal rocks that were dated at 16.7 ± 0.6 Ma (Poliquin, 2009) and volcanic rocks that were dated between 16.0 ± 0.8 Ma and 15.3 ± 0.8 Ma (Ferrusquia-Villafranca and McDowell, 1991). Thus, plausible ages for these deposits are <15.3 Ma.
●. The Altagracia-Águila-Arista Ag-Au-Zn-Pb-Cu deposits belong to the epithermal type and their host volcanic rocks were dated between 15.82 ± 0.37 and 14.96 ± 0.85 Ma (Ferrusquía-Villafranca and McDowell, 1991). Thus, plausible ages for these deposits are <14.96 Ma.
●. The Santa Margarita-Azucena project contains a Cu-Fe skarn deposit and Ag-Au epithermal veins, and is associated with granodioritic hypabyssal rocks dated at 14.9 ± 0.3 Ma (G. Solís-Pichardo, written communication), which correlate with volcaniclastic rocks dated between 15.82 ± 0.37 and 14.96 ± 0.85 Ma (Ferrusquía-Villafranca and McDowell, 1991). Thus, plausible ages for this deposit are ≤14.9 Ma.
●. The Guielavazar Ag-Cu-Zn-Pb epithermal (?) deposits are hosted by andesites and possibly postdate diabase and tonalite bodies that were dated between 15.16 ± 0.75 and 13.01 ± 0.76 Ma (Ferrusquía-Villafranca, 1999). Thus, plausible ages for these deposits are <13.01 Ma.
●. Other possible ore deposits in the region within the range of ages determined by the deposits above are the Cu-Au-Ag porphyry-type (?) deposits of La Esperanza and Poterillo in Santa María Jalapa del Marqués.
In summary, these magmatic-hydrothermal ore deposits-along with those in the study area-may collectively bracket a highly productive early to middle Miocene metallogenic period (between <23.8 and <13.01 Ma) for the easternmost regions of the Sierra Madre del Sur.
Earlier metallogenic activity in the Sierra Madre del Sur (especially during the Eocene and Oligocene) is well documented, particularly due to the occurrence of large ore deposits of historical economic importance such as those in the Taxco or Mezcala districts. However, the potential of Miocene metallogeny in this igneous province has received very little attention. Miocene metallogenic provinces in Mexico have been identified to be associated with (1) the terminal volcanism of the Sierra Madre Occidental during the early Miocene, (2) the inception of volcanism of the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt during the middle Miocene, (3) the opening of the Gulf of California and the rifting-off of the Baja California peninsula during the middle Miocene, (4) the installation of alkaline magmatism in Chiapas between the middle Miocene and the Pliocene and, only timidly formulated, and (5) the terminal volcanism of the Sierra Madre del Sur (Camprubí, 2013). Therefore, this paper provides sound evidence (and makes a case) for the metallogenic relevance of the early to middle Miocene metallogenic province of the Sierra Madre del Sur in the central part of the Oaxaca state. The central region of Oaxaca contains many hydrothermal ore deposits (Figure 3) whose origin, however uncharacterized, is likely to have a similar “blood relationship” with the Sierra Madre del Sur volcanism as the deposits listed above.
4. Conclusions
●. The age of the Zacatepec polymetallic skarn deposit (early Miocene,ca. 17 Ma for prograde stages) in the highlands of central-eastern Oaxaca clusters with several other magmatic-hydrothermal ore deposits. The ages of such skarn, porphyry-type and epithermal deposits range between <23.8 and <13.01 Ma, and are circumscribed to the terminal stages of magmatism in the Sierra Madre del Sur (SMS).
●. Therefore, the Miocene volcanic and intrusive rocks constitute the metallotect for a newly defined metallogenic province and epoch for the SMS besides the most common occurrence of Eocene and Oligocene magmatic-hydrothermal ore deposits in the rest of the SMS.
●. Due to the scarcity of the available ages and their relative character, it is advisable to endeavor geochronologic studies of as many ore deposits in the region as possible, in order to better constrain the timing of magmatic-hydrothermal deposits in this metallogenic province.