1. Introduction
The whole-rock geochemical studies of siliciclastic sedimentary rocks can generally be used as additional data to petrography, and the combination of the two techniques is a powerful tool in determining rock composition, paleo-weathering, and tectonic setting of source terrains (Bhatia and Crook, 1986; McLennan et al., 1993; Garzanti et al., 1996; Ratcliffe et al., 2007; Jafarzadeh et al., 2014; Puy-Alquiza et al., 2014; Verma and Armstrong-Altrin, 2016; Armstrong-Altrin et al., 2017; Azizi et al., 2018; Jafarzadeh et al., 2022). During the Middle to Late Palaeozoic, parts of Iran, including Alborz mountain of Northern Iran, Central Iran, Sanandaj-Sirjan, and Northwestern Iran, along with several other plates, including the Afghan and Turkish plates, were connected to the African and Arabian plates and were regarded as a fragment of the southern margin of the Paleo-Tethys or in other words, part of the northwestern margin of Gondwana (Berberian and King, 1981; Sengor, 1990; Husseini, 1991, Ruban et al., 2007; Horton et al., 2008). The uplift and erosion caused by the late Devonian to Carboniferous Hercynian Orogeny prevented the simultaneous sediments from being distributed across the Arabian Peninsula. A regional comparison between the Upper Devonian to Lower Carboniferous sediments of Iran and other parts of the Middle East, such as Iraq, Turkey, Syria, and Saudi Arabia, showed that during this time, there was a vast continental margin that included North Africa and Saudi Arabia (Husseini, 1991).
Hitherto, many studies have been performed in various fields, including biostratigraphy, paleontology (Abbasi et al., 2016), sequence stratigraphy, and sedimentology (Najafzadeh, 2008; Nekounam, 2016) on the Upper Devonian Ilanqareh Formation. In the meantime, few studies have been done on the provenance of its siliciclastic parts. Among these studies, very few attempts have been made to investigate the provenance with the aid of petrographic and whole rock geochemical analysis of siliciclastic rocks. Najafzadeh et al., (2010) conducted the first study on the provenance of Ilanqareh sediments in Ilanlu and Ilanqareh outcrops using petrography and trace element geochemistry data. Anjerdi et al., (2020) also examined the provenance of these sediments in the Pireshaq section (south of Jolfa), which did not show a complete section of sediments of the Ilanqareh Formation, and its lower contact was faulted. Bónová et al., (2021a) also studied detrital tourmaline and rutile grains separated from Ilanqareh sandstones and considered Arabian-Nubian Shield as a source for natural tourmaline grains and East African Belt for the unique V-rich tourmaline grains. Given the fact that the use of major element geochemistry is of special importance in provenance studies is among the particularly useful indicator for determining the provenance (Taylor and McLennan, 1985; Bhatia and Crook, 1986; Roser and Korsch, 1986; McLennan and Taylor, 1991; Bauluz et al., 2000; Verma and Armstrong-Altrin, 2013; Taheri et al., 2018; Moghaddam et al., 2020), this study has sought to check the possible source rocks, tectonic setting of the source area, and the intensity of weathering at the time of sedimentation of Ilanqareh Formation using a combination of petrographic and major element geochemical methods at Ilanlu section in Azarbaijan Province, NW Iran.
2. Geological setting
Iranian Plateau is a tectonically active region within the Alpine-Himalayan orogenic belt and stands at a compressional zone between two rigid convergent blocks (Arabia and Eurasia) (Berberian and King, 1981). In the classification of the structural units of Iran (Nabavi, 1976), this area is situated in the western Alborz-Azarbaijan zone (Figure 1), which is part of the Alpine-Himalayan fold belt. During the Devonian, Alborz-Azarbaijan Range was part of the northern edge of the Gondwana, which was moving toward the north due to convergence with Laurasia in the north (Berberian and King, 1981).
The Devonian siliciclastic-carbonate deposits of the Ilanqareh Formation in the Azarbaijan district of Iran are the western continuation of similar deposits (Jeirud Formation) in the central Alborz (Wendt et al., 2005). Comparison of the Ilanqareh Formation with the Upper Palaeozoic formations in other areas of the Middle East shows that during the deposition of these sediments, North Africa and Saudi Arabia were subjected to an intercontinental extension from Late Devonian to possibly Early Carboniferous, and the Arabian and adjacent plates were structurally affected by a regional Hercynian tectonic event (Husseini, 1991, 1992). The first study which showed the transgression of sandstone, conglomerate, and fossiliferous limestones of the Devonian Ilanqareh Formation over a Precambrian crystalline basement in the Azarbaijan region was carried out by Grewingk (1853) Rieben (1935) performed the first biostratigraphic studies on carbonate parts of the Ilanqareh Formation. The lower contact of Ilanqareh Formation is not over Precambrian crystalline basement in all parts of Azarbaijan area, and in some places, including the north of Tabriz, the transgression of Ilanqareh deposits is on Lower Palaeozoic sandstones of Lalun and Mila formations. Moreover, the deposits of this formation are overlain by the dolomites of the Ruteh Formation (Alavi-Naini and Bolourchi, 1973).
According to Alavi-Naini and Bolourchi (1973), Ilanqareh Formation can be stratigraphically divided into four members, including A) dolomite with interlayers of limestone and shale; B) thin-bedded fossiliferous limestone and shale; C) sandstone shale unit; and D) limestones related to the Lower Carboniferous.
The type section of the Ilanqareh Formation is located near Ilanqareh village in the area between Maku and the Aras River, but due to the folding and faulting in the region, lithostratigraphic units of the Ilanqareh Formation are not well defined in this area (Wendt et al., 2005).
The present study has investigated an outcrop around the city of Jolfa and south of the Aras Dam (Northern Ilanlu village) called the Ilanlu section (Figure 2). The thickness of the Ilanqareh Formation in the Ilanlu section is 520 meters (Figure 3), and it is located over the dolomites of Mulli Formation, and the upper boundary contains Carboniferous limestones (Figures 4a and 4b).
The focus of this study is on sandstones and shales of member C of the formation. The sandstones of this member are often medium layered and have a parallel laminated sedimentary structure (Figure 4c). In some places, these sandstones are visible, along with the interlayers of highly fissile, micaceous reddish shale.
3. Methods and materials
A stratigraphic outcrop from the Ilanqareh Formation was measured and sampled at the Ilanlu section. Thirty representative fresh samples were selected for petrographic investigations. Among them, twenty medium-grained sandstone samples were selected for modal analysis. The amounts of detrital and diagenetic components were determined by counting 300 points in every 20 thin sections (Table 1). Point counting was done using the Gazzi-Dickinson method (Ingersoll et al., 1984). Table 2 lists the recalculated modal compositions for the sandstones. Total abundances of the major oxides were reported on a 0.5g sample analyzed by ICP-emission spectrometry following a lithium metaborate/ tetraborate fusion and dilute nitric digestion at the laboratories of the ACME, Canada (Table 3). Weight difference after ignition at 1000°C used to determine Loss on ignition (LOI). For each element analyzed, the reproducibility of replicate analyses and the deviation from the certified values of the secondary standards are less than 5% relative.
Sample no. | Quartz | Feldspar | Rock Fragment | Cement | Bio | Acc | Sum | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Monocrystal | Polycrystal | Kf | P | Cht | S | V | M | Cal | Fe Oxi | Silica | Clay | ||||||
Nonundulatory | Undulatory | < or = 3 Crystal | >3 Crystal | ||||||||||||||
IS1 | 95 | 39 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 98 | 35 | 10 | 5 | 29 | 12 | 332 |
IS2 | 109 | 42 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 89 | 39 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 9 | 311 |
IS3 | 99 | 39 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 101 | 11 | 8 | 0 | 22 | 15 | 302 |
IS4 | 149 | 73 | 0 | 10 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 45 | 35 | 14 | 0 | 9 | 358 |
IS5 | 89 | 44 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 115 | 15 | 5 | 16 | 0 | 8 | 303 |
IS6 | 148 | 75 | 0 | 8 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 12 | 9 | 17 | 0 | 11 | 345 |
IS7 | 159 | 85 | 0 | 9 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 | 33 | 21 | 0 | 12 | 349 |
IS8 | 152 | 76 | 0 | 8 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 | 45 | 15 | 0 | 5 | 337 |
IS9 | 149 | 81 | 0 | 7 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 12 | 47 | 21 | 0 | 14 | 351 |
IS10 | 139 | 79 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 32 | 25 | 0 | 12 | 306 |
IS11 | 143 | 91 | 0 | 6 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 39 | 26 | 0 | 9 | 337 |
IS12 | 151 | 89 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 41 | 35 | 0 | 12 | 356 |
IS13 | 142 | 89 | 0 | 11 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 45 | 14 | 0 | 9 | 340 |
IS14 | 149 | 96 | 0 | 9 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 39 | 12 | 0 | 11 | 334 |
IS15 | 146 | 101 | 0 | 8 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 42 | 5 | 0 | 8 | 327 |
IS16 | 151 | 98 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 51 | 17 | 0 | 15 | 346 |
IS17 | 144 | 87 | 0 | 7 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 45 | 39 | 13 | 0 | 11 | 360 |
IS18 | 145 | 91 | 0 | 8 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 38 | 12 | 0 | 13 | 352 |
IS19 | 147 | 94 | 0 | 6 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 41 | 22 | 0 | 9 | 351 |
IS20 | 141 | 103 | 0 | 7 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 39 | 17 | 0 | 14 | 365 |
Mean | 137 | 79 | 0 | 7 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 19 | 32 | 16 | 3 | 11 | 338 |
Sample | Qt FL(%) | Qm F Lt (%) | Q F Rf (5) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Qt | F | L | Qm | F | Lt | Q | F | Rf | |
IS1 | 95.8 | 4.2 | 0.0 | 93.7 | 4.2 | 2.1 | 95.8 | 4.2 | 0.0 |
IS2 | 95.1 | 4.9 | 0.0 | 92.1 | 4.9 | 3.0 | 95.1 | 4.9 | 0.0 |
IS3 | 96.6 | 3.4 | 0.0 | 95.2 | 3.4 | 1.4 | 96.6 | 3.4 | 0.0 |
IS4 | 94.7 | 5.3 | 0.0 | 90.6 | 5.3 | 4.1 | 94.7 | 5.3 | 0.0 |
IS5 | 96.5 | 3.5 | 0.0 | 92.4 | 3.5 | 4.2 | 96.5 | 3.5 | 0.0 |
IS6 | 95.9 | 4.1 | 0.0 | 92.5 | 4.1 | 3.3 | 95.9 | 4.1 | 0.0 |
IS7 | 95.8 | 4.2 | 0.0 | 92.4 | 4.2 | 3.4 | 95.8 | 4.2 | 0.0 |
IS8 | 95.2 | 4.8 | 0.0 | 91.9 | 4.8 | 3.2 | 95.2 | 4.8 | 0.0 |
IS9 | 96.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 93.1 | 4.0 | 2.8 | 96.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 |
IS10 | 96.1 | 3.9 | 0.0 | 94.0 | 3.9 | 2.2 | 96.1 | 3.9 | 0.0 |
IS11 | 95.6 | 4.4 | 0.0 | 93.2 | 4.4 | 2.4 | 95.6 | 4.4 | 0.0 |
IS12 | 96.4 | 3.6 | 0.0 | 94.9 | 3.6 | 1.6 | 96.4 | 3.6 | 0.0 |
IS13 | 94.2 | 5.8 | 0.0 | 89.9 | 5.8 | 4.3 | 94.2 | 5.8 | 0.0 |
IS14 | 96.9 | 3.1 | 0.0 | 93.5 | 3.1 | 3.4 | 96.9 | 3.1 | 0.0 |
IS15 | 95.5 | 4.5 | 0.0 | 92.5 | 4.5 | 3.0 | 95.5 | 4.5 | 0.0 |
IS16 | 96.6 | 3.4 | 0.0 | 94.7 | 3.4 | 1.9 | 96.6 | 3.4 | 0.0 |
IS17 | 96.4 | 3.6 | 0.0 | 93.5 | 3.6 | 2.8 | 96.4 | 3.6 | 0.0 |
IS18 | 95.3 | 4.7 | 0.0 | 92.2 | 4.7 | 3.1 | 95.3 | 4.7 | 0.0 |
IS19 | 95.7 | 4.3 | 0.0 | 93.4 | 4.3 | 2.3 | 95.7 | 4.3 | 0.0 |
IS20 | 96.5 | 3.5 | 0.0 | 93.8 | 3.5 | 2.7 | 96.5 | 3.5 | 0.0 |
Sample | IS4 | IS7 | IS10 | IS14 | IS19 | ISH3 | ISH6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SS | SS | SS | SS | SS | SH | SH | |
SiO2 | 89.54 | 93.05 | 89.24 | 97.04 | 90.03 | 53.88 | 56.22 |
Al2O3 | 4.81 | 2.99 | 5.37 | 1.53 | 4.5 | 25.59 | 27.78 |
Fe2O3 | 2.42 | 1.64 | 0.82 | 0.57 | 2.01 | 5.62 | 1.13 |
MgO | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.46 | 0.27 |
CaO | 0.14 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.05 | 0.3 | 0.25 |
Na2O | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.09 |
K2O | 0.41 | 0.71 | 1.25 | 0.3 | 0.83 | 1.97 | 1.98 |
TiO2 | 0.35 | 0.19 | 0.85 | 0.07 | 0.45 | 1.11 | 1.37 |
P2O5 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.27 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.15 | 0.07 |
MnO | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.01 |
LOI | 2.1 | 1.1 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 1.8 | 10.6 | 10.6 |
CIA | 90.42 | 78.18 | 84.38 | 79.76 | 82.35 | 91.55 | 91.93 |
ICV | 0.71 | 0.91 | 0.59 | 0.66 | 0.78 | 0.37 | 0.18 |
4. Results
4.1. Petrography
In terms of grain size, the studied sandstones were mostly fine to medium, and they were moderately to well-sorted. The petrographic composition of the Ilanqareh sandstones is listed in Table 1. The main components of these sandstones were quartz and potassium feldspar. In all samples, quartz occurred with nonundulatory monocrystalline quartz being the dominant type and ranging from 29.3% to 45.5% (avg. 40.4%) in the Ilanlu section (Figure 5a). Undulatory extinction monocrystalline quartz (Figure 5a) ranged between 11.7% and 30.8% (avg. 23.0%). The polycrystalline (Figure 5b) quartz variety was a common form with an average of 1.9%. Feldspar occurred as K-feldspar (Figure 5c) ranging from 1.7% to 4.4% (avg. 2.8%). There were no lithic fragments in the Ilanqareh sandstones. Accessory minerals (avg. 3.2%) occurred in the form of muscovite and some heavy minerals, such as tourmaline and zircon (Figure 5d). Cements occurred in the most abundant forms of carbonate ranging from 0% to 38 % (avg. 15.5%), iron oxide ranging from 0% to 13 % (avg. 8.8%), silica ranging from 1% to 9 % (avg. 5.2%), and clay ranging from 0 % to 9 % (avg. 4%), respectively (Figures 5e and 5f). In order to classify the sandstones, their counted components were recalculated to 100%, excluding cements, matrix, and accessory components. Based on the average composition of the three main framework grain (Table 1), the composition of the sandstones was found to be quartzarenite and subarkose according to the Folk (1980) classification (Figure 6a) and quartzose based on the Garzanti (2016) classification (Figure 6b). Plotting the point-counting data of the Ilanqareh Formation on the diagram of ratio of total quartz on total feldspar plus rock fragments (Qt/F+RF) against polycrystalline quartz and chert on feldspar plus rock fragments (Suttner and Dutta,1986) indicated the existence of a humid climate (Figure 7). Based on recalculated compositions of the sandstone’s modal analysis (Qm-F-Lt and Qt-F-L; table 2), all the studied samples fell into the craton interior field (Figures 8a - 8b).
4.2. Geochemistry
Table 3 presents the major element concentrations of the analyzed sandstone (N=5) and shale (N=2) samples. The SiO2 content of the sandstone samples ranged from 89.24% to 97.04% (avg. 91.78 wt%), while shale samples had SiO2 content of 53.78 wt% to 56.22 wt%. The sandstones were also characterized by low content of Al2O3 (1.53-5.37 wt%), CaO (0.05-0.14 wt%), TiO2 (0.07-0.85 wt%), Fe2O3 (0.57-2.42 wt%), and K2O (0.3-1.25 wt%). These major oxides also had very low values in the shale samples except for the Al2O3, which varied from 25.59 wt% to 27.78 wt%. The major oxides of sandstones were examined based on bivariate diagrams against Al2O3. Accordingly, Al2O3 and SiO2 showed a negative correlation (Figure 9a). Among the other oxides, MgO, CaO, and TiO2 showed strong positive correlations with Al2O3 (Figures 9b-9d). On the K2O against Al2O3 (Figure 9e), all samples lay below the K2O/Al2O3 ratio of 0.3 (dotted line), which indicated that most of the K2O were inside the clay fractions (K2O/Al2O3 < 0.3) and not in the potassium feldspars (0.3 < K2O/Al2O3 < 0.9, according to Cox et al. (1995)). Among the other oxides, Fe2O3 showed a weak positive correlation with Al2O3 (Figure 9f), and the remaining major oxides (MnO and Na2O, not illustrated in Figure 9) indicated a low correlation with Al2O3.
In order to determine the degree of weathering of sediments, different indices have been suggested based on the molecular ratios of various oxides of different elements, especially mobile ones (MgO, CaO, K2O, and Na2O), relative to immobile elements and oxides, such as ZrO2, Al2O3, and TiO2 (Parker 1970; Nesbitt and Young, 1982; Fedo et al., 1995; Nesbitt et al., 1996; Scheffler et al., 2006). One of the most important criteria for determining the intensity of chemical weathering is the chemical index of alteration (CIA) (Nesbitt and Young, 1982). The CIA is expressed as Al2O3/ (Al2O3 + CaO*+ Na2O + K2O) x 100, where all the oxides are in molecular proportion and CaO* represents Ca in silicate minerals. (Nesbitt and Young, 1982). The studied sandstone and shale samples had CIA values of 78.18 to 90.42 and 91.55 to 91.93, respectively (Table 3). The climatic condition of the source areas of siliciclastic sediments can also be determined based on the diagram of SiO2 versus (Al2O3+K2O+Na2O) (Suttner and Dutta, 1986) (Figure 10), in which samples of the Ilanqareh Formation were plotted in the humid climate range.
The Index of Compositional Variability (ICV; Cox et al., 1995) expressed as ICV = (Fe2O3 + K2O + Na2O + CaO +MgO + MnO + TiO2)/Al2O3 can be used to measure the degree of the recycling and compositional maturity of siliciclastic sedimentary rocks. As can be seen in Table 3, the sandstones and shales of the Ilanqareh Formation had ICVs of 0.59-0.91 and 0.18-0.37, respectively.
In K2O/Na2O versus SiO2 diagram proposed by Roser and Korsch (1986), the data from studied samples fell into a passive margin tectonic setting (Figure 11a). By using the new major element discrimination function diagrams of Verma and Armstrong-Altrin (2013) all the studied sandstones (except sample IS14 with (SiO2)Adj >95 %) and one shale sample (ISH6) were completely in the rift field of the high-silica diagram, and one shale sample (ISH3) fell into the collision range using the low-silica diagram (Figures 11b and 11c).
5. Discussion
5.1 Paleoweathering
The intensity of chemical weathering is a function of the climate and tectonic activity. Lower tectonic activity and higher humidity in the source region result in more intense chemical weathering. The use of point-count data and whole rock geochemical data can help in assessing the paleo-climate condition of siliciclastic sediments (Suttner and Dutta, 1986). The ratio of Qt/F+RF against Qp/F+RF (Figure 7), also the high amount of SiO2 in contrast to the low amount of Al2O3, K2O and Na2O (Figure 10) in studied sandstones indicated that the degree of chemical weathering in the source areas of these sediments was moderate to high, which is confirmed by the values of the chemical index of alteration calculated for the studied sandstone and shale samples (Table3). The paleogeographic maps presented by Bagheri and Stampfli (2008) also show that the region of Azarbaijan was located above 30 degrees south latitudes during the early Devonian to the early and middle Permian and according to Zhuravlev and Sokiran (2020), this region was located in a temperate climate during the Late Devonian.
5.2. Effect of Recycling
Although in petrographic studies no evidence of sedimentary recycling such as sedimentary rock fragments and chert has been seen, nevertheless, geochemical studies assured the effect of sedimentary recycling in these sandstones. Samples with ICVs above 1 are usually first cycle and immature sediments, whereas those with ICVs below 1 are highly mature (recycled). As can be seen in table 3, the sandstones and shales of the Ilanqareh Formation show ICVs below 1, indicating that they were not the first cycle sediments. Similar results have been also observed in studies on Devonian deposits in other parts of Iran, including Alborz (Hosseini et al., 2019; Jafarzadeh et al., 2021; Bónová et al., 2021a, 2021b) and Central Iran (Zand-Moghadam et al., 2013) and Zagros (Zoleikhaei et al., 2015). The existence of sedimentary recycling in the supply of sediments of the Ilanqareh Formation has been corroborated, especially by studying the heavy minerals (highly rounded zircon, tourmaline, and rutile and high ZTR index) in these sandstones (Bónová et al., 2021a, 2021b). Nevertheless, the increase of ultrastable heavy minerals, in addition to being the result of recycling, can also be related to intense weathering and long transport during sedimentation (Bassis et al., 2016).
5.3.Tectonic Setting
The results of sandstone modal analysis based on three main components (Qm-F-Lt and Qt-F-L) can provide important information about the types of the main provenance, such as the cratons’ interior, recycled orogens, basement uplifts, and magmatic arcs (Dickinson and Suczek, 1979; Dickinson et al., 1983). According to the petrographic studies and point count analysis performed in this study using the QmFLt and QtFL diagrams of Dickinson et al., (1983), the studied samples were plotted in the fields of stable cratons (Figure 8), which generally reflected very mature sandstones derived from areas of low lying granitoid or gneiss sources (Dickinson et al., 1983). Therefore, it seems that the entry of sediments from the source of stable craton can be considered the main source for the sediments of the Ilanqareh Formation. The relationship between siliciclastic whole-rock geochemistry and plate tectonic of source areas has been explored by many sedimentologists and geochemists (Bhatia, 1983; McLennan et al., 1990; Kumon and Kiminami, 1994; Verma and Armstrong-Altrin, 2013). Whole rock geochemical data such as K2O/Na2O versus SiO2 diagram (Figure 11a) proposed by Roser and Korsch (1986) and major element discrimination function diagrams of Verma and Armstrong-Altrin (2013) (Figures 11b-11c) also avouched the existence of a rift which is consisted with passive margin (Verma et al., 2016) tectonic setting for the studied samples.
5.4. Paleogeographic Implication
The land of Iran and the region of Azarbaijan, along with the plate of Turkey and the largest part of the Middle East continents, are located on the passive northwestern margin of the Gondwana supercontinent and are connected to the African-Arabian plate on the southern edge of the Paleo-Tethys Ocean on the width of about 30 degrees south. The paleogeographic location of Iran in the Paleozoic (Stampfli and Borel, 2003), the abundance of Neoproterozoic-Early Cambrian (Cadomian) granites in Iran and other regions such as Thurides and Iberia (Moghaddam et al., 2017) and recent studies in different regions of Iran’s sedimentary-structural zones on the Devonian deposits (Aharipour et al., 2010; Zand-Moghadam et al., 2013) have confirmed this issue. Considering the conjunction of these plates in the northern margin of the Gondwana supercontinent in the Devonian period and according to the paleogeography of the study area in that period, Arabian Craton can be considered the main source for direct entry of sediments into the sedimentary basin of the Ilanqareh Formation in Devonian. Recycling and erosion of sediments of the Lower Palaeozoic age which also derived their sediments from the Arabian Craton can be considered a secondary source for the entry of sediments into the sedimentary basin of the Ilanqareh Formation. Most of the sandstones studied in different regions of the Middle East and different parts of Iran indicate the predominant composition of quartz arenite and felsic parent rocks associated with the Arabian Craton (Zand-Moghadam et al., 2013; Zoleikhaei et al., 2015; Bassis et al., 2016).
6.Conclusion
1. The investigation of the Ilanqareh Formation sandstones reveals quartzarenite and subarkose as the main sandstone types.
2. The late Devonian in the northern margin of the Gondwana belonged to humid paleoclimate based on point counting and geochemical data.
3. It can be comprehensively inferred that the tectonic setting of provenance areas of the Upper Devonian Ilanqareh sediment was mainly related to the passive continental margin.
4. The entry of sediments from the source of stable craton can be considered the main source for the sediments of the Ilanqareh Formation and recycling of older sedimentary rocks could be another source of these sediments.
5. Considering the conjunction of blocks of Iran, Alborz, and Azarbaijan in the northern margin of the Gondwana during the Devonian, Arabian Craton could be the main source for the sediments entering the Ilanqareh Basin.