Servicios Personalizados
Revista
Articulo
nueva página del texto (beta)
Español (pdf)
Artículo en XML
Referencias del artículo
Traducción automática
Enviar artículo por emailIndicadores
-
Citado por SciELO -
Accesos
Links relacionados
-
Similares en
SciELO
Compartir
Permalink
Revista odontológica mexicana
versión impresa ISSN 1870-199X
Rev. Odont. Mex vol.12 no.1 Ciudad de México mar. 2008
https://doi.org/10.22201/fo.1870199xp.2008.12.1.15703
Casos clínicos
Distracción mandibular bilateral: Reporte de un caso clínico y revisión de la literatura
Bilateral osteogenic distraction of the mandible: Case report
*Residente de 4to año de la Especialidad de Cirugía Oral y Maxilofacial de la División de Estudios de Postgrado e Investigación de la UNAM.
§Titular del Curso de la Especialidad de Cirugía Oral y Maxilofacial del HRGIZ ISSSTE.
Existen numerosas causas que originan una deficiencia en el desarrollo mandibular (anquilosis temporomandibular, microsomía craneofacial, secuencia de Pierre Robin, síndrome de Treacher Collins, etc.) y otras son desconocidas. La hipoplasia mandibular es una condición conceptualmente sencilla, pero que puede ser difícil de tratar. La distracción osteogénica mandibular ha ganado popularidad como la técnica quirúrgica indicada para el tratamiento de pacientes con hipoplasia mandibular. Ya que se elimina la morbilidad de una zona donadora y la complejidad del procedimiento quirúrgico es menor que el resto de las alternativas. Sin embargo la distracción osteogénica no es un procedimiento que se deberá tomar a la ligera ya que requiere de una cuidadosa planeación. Se presenta un caso de hipoplasia de rama mandibular bilateral en un paciente masculino de 6 años de edad, reportando los datos clínicos, imagenológicos, el plan de tratamiento, el procedimiento quirúrgico utilizando un distractor interno, y su evolución.
Palabras clave: Distracción osteogénica; hipoplasia; rama mandibular
Numerous causes origin a deficient mandibular development (TMJ ankylosis, craniofacial microsomia, Pierre Robin sequence, Treacher Collins syndrome, etc.) and others that are not known. Mandibular hypoplasia is a conceptually easy condition but it can be difficult to treat. Osteogenic distraction of the mandible has gained popularity as the technique indicated for the treatment of patients with mandibular hypoplasia. This is because the morbidity of a donor site is eliminated and the complexity of the surgical procedure is less than in the rest of the alternatives. Nevertheless osteogenic distraction is not a procedure that should be taken lightly as it needs careful planning. We present a case of mandibular ramus hypoplasia in a 6- year-old male patient, reporting the clinical and radiographical data, treatment plan, surgical technique using an internal distractor and his evolution.
Key words: Osteogenic distraction; hypoplasia; mandibular ramus
Referencias
1. Codivilla A. On the jeans of lengthening in the lower limbs. Am J Orthop Surg 1995; 2: 353-369. [ Links ]
2. Abbott L. The operative lengthening of the tibia an fibula. J Bone Joint Surg 1927; 9: 128-152. [ Links ]
3. Ilizarov GA. The principles of the Llazarov method. Bull Hosp Dis Orthop Inst 1988; 48: 1-11. [ Links ]
4. Snyder CC, Levine GA, Swanson HM, Browne EZ Jr. Mandibular lengthening by gradual distraction. Preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 1973; 51: 506-508. [ Links ]
5. Michieli S, Miotti B. Lengthening a mandibular body by gradual surgical-orthodontic distraction. J Oral Surg 1977; 35: 187-192. [ Links ]
6. Kutsevliak VL, Sukachev VA. Distraktsiia nizinnet theliusti veksperimente. Stomatologia 1984; 63: 13-15. [ Links ]
7. Karp NS, Thorne CH, McCarthy JG, Schreiber JS. Bone lengthening in craniofacial skeleton. Ann Plast Surg 1990; 24: 231-237. [ Links ]
8. McCarthy JG, Aschreiber J, Karp N, Thorne CH, Gravson BH. Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Comment in Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 92: 372-373. [ Links ]
9. Molina F, Ortiz Monasterio F. Mandibular elongation and remodeling by distraction. A farewell to major osteotomies. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 96: 825-840. [ Links ]
10. Rachmiel A, Potparic Z, Jackson IT. Midface advancement by gradual distraction. Br J Plast Surg 1993; 46: 201-207. [ Links ]
11. Guerrero C, Bell WH, Contasti G. Mandibular widening by intraoral distraction osteogenesis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996; 54: 309-314. [ Links ]
12. Block MS, Chang A, Crawford C. Mandibular alveolar ridge augmentation in the dog using distraction osteogenesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996; 54: 309-314. [ Links ]
13. Stucki-McCormick SU, Winick R, Winick A. Distraction osteogénesis for the reconstruction of the temporomandibular joint. NY State Dent J 1998; 64: 36-41. [ Links ]
14. Lauritzen C, Munro IR, Ross RB. Classification and treatment of hemifacial microsomia. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1985; 19: 33-39. [ Links ]
15. McNamara JA. Components of clas II malocclusions in children 8-10 years of age. Angle Orthod 1981; 51: 177-202. [ Links ]
16. Arnett GW. A redefinition of bilateral sagittal osteotomy advancement relapse. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1993; 104: 506-515. [ Links ]
17. Carlotti AE, Schendel SA. Surgical management of short mandibular ramus deformities. Bell WH, Modern Practice. In: Orthognatic and reconstructive surgery. Ed 2: Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1998. [ Links ]
18. Van Sickels JE, Larsen AJ, Thrash WJ. A retrospective study of relapse in rigidly fixated sagittal split osteotomies. Contributing factors. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988; 91: 413-418. [ Links ]
19. Losken W, Patterson GT, Lazarou SA. Planing mandibular distraction: Preliminary report. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1995; 32: 71. [ Links ]
20. Hoffmeister B, Marks C, Wolff KD. Intraoral callus distraction using the floating bone concept. Am Cleft Palate Craneofac Assoc 55th Annual Meeting, Baltimore, MD. 1998: April. [ Links ]
21. Rubio-Bueno P, Villa E, Carreno A, Naval L, Sastre J, Diaz FJ. Intraoral mandibular distraction osteogenesis: special attention to treatment planning. J Cranio Maxillofac Surg 2001: 1-9. [ Links ]
22. Hanson P, Melugin M. Orthodontic management of the patient undergoing mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Sem Orthod 1999; 5: 25-34. [ Links ]
23. Proffit W, White P, Sarver D. Contemporary treatment of dentofacial deformity. 1ra ed. St. Louis Miss.: Mosby; 2003: 365-375. [ Links ]
24. Rubio-Bueno P, Villa E, Padron A, Diaz FJ. Distraction osteogénesis of the ascending ramus for mandibular hipoplasia using extraoral or intraoral devices. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000; 58: 593-599. [ Links ]
Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons
