During a helminthological survey in a population of wild lesser grison Galictis cuja (Molina, 1872) (Carnivora, Mustelidae), 18 specimens of this host species were necropsied. The specimens examined were accidental ‘road kills’ on the Federal highway BR-040 between the cities of Três Rios, state of Rio de Janeiro (RJ), km 11 (22°02′49″ S, 43°12′02″ W), and Simão Pereira, state of Minas Gerais (MG), km 827 (22°00′08″ S, 43°16′36″ W), in the southeast region, Brazil, between 2009 and 2014. The Brazilian Institute of Environment and Natural Resources authorized the sampling - IBAMA/SISBIO (Request No. 30727-4).

The hosts were identified according to ^{Yensen and Tarifa (2003)} and ^{Bornholdt et al. (2013)} by the absence of a metaconoid in the inferior premolar tooth, characteristic of G. cuja. The hosts parasitized by acanthocephalans were deposited in the Mastozoology Collection of the National Museum of Rio de Janeiro of Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (MNRJ/UFRJ) (MNRJ 79162, MNRJ 79190, MNRJ 79261, MNRJ 79294 and MNRJ 79407).

The acanthocephalans were fixed in AFA (70% ethanol, 93 parts; 37% formalin, 5 parts; glacial acetic acid, 2 parts) for 48 h, stored in ethanol 70° GL, stained in Delafield's Hematoxylin and mounted in Canada balsam on permanent slides for specific identification. The specimens were identified and digital images were recorded with an Olympus BX-51 microscope light microscope equipped with Nomarski differential interference contrast (DIC) optics. Identification of acanthocephalan worms was based on ^{Machado-Filho (1950)} and ^{Schmidt (1972)}. Voucher specimens were deposited in the Helminthological Collection of Oswaldo Cruz Institute (CHIOC 38100), Rio de Janeiro, RJ.

The prevalence of parasitism by Pachysentis gethi (^{Machado-Filho, 1950}) (Fig. 1) in lesser grison of this current study was 27.7% (5 infected hosts), with a mean intensity of 2.6 parasites per infected host, and mean abundance of 0.7 parasites per examined host.

Figure 1 Female specimen of Pachysentis gethi. (a) Anterior region, lateral view; (b) anterior region, ventral view; (c) anterior end, detail of proboscis, lateral view; (d) anterior end, detail of hooks and roots of hooks, ventral view; (e) details of the location of eggs, lateral view; (f) posterior region, detail of apical genital pore, lateral view. 

^{Meyer (1931)} proposed the genus Pachysentis to include the species P. ehrenbergi ^{Meyer, 1931}, P. canicola ^{Meyer, 1931}, and P. procumbens ^{Meyer, 1931}, from Brazilian and Egyptian carnivores. Currently, 10 nominal species of this parasitic genus in mammal hosts around the world are considered valid: Pachysentis angolensis (Golvan, 1957), P. canicola ^{Meyer, 1931} (type species), Pachysentis dollfusi (^{Machado-Filho, 1950}), P. ehrenbergi ^{Meyer, 1931}, P. gethi, Pachysentis lenti (^{Machado-Filho, 1950}), P. procumbens ^{Meyer, 1931}, Pachysentis procyonis (^{Machado-Filho, 1950}), Pachysentis rugosus (^{Machado-Filho, 1950}) and Pachysentis septemserialis (^{Machado-Filho, 1950}) (^{Amin, 2013}).

In Brazil, 5 species of Pachysentis have been reported (^{Machado-Filho, 1950}; Vieira, Luque, & Muniz-Pereira, 2008). P. lenti was described parasitizing Callithrix geoffroyi (Humboldt, 1812) (Primates, Callitrichidae) from the state of Espirito Santo; P. procyonis (^{Machado-Filho, 1950}) is a parasite of Procyon cancrivorus (Cuvier, 1789) (Carnivora, Procyonidae) in the state of Rio de Janeiro; P. rugosus (^{Machado-Filho, 1950}) was reported in the large intestine of Cebus cay (Illiger, 1815) (Primates, Cebidae) in the state of Rio de Janeiro; P. septemserialis (^{Machado-Filho, 1950}) is a parasite of Saguinus ursulus Hoffmannsegg, 1807 (Primates, Cebidae) in the state of Pará; and P. gethi was described as a parasite of Eira barbara Linnaeus, 1758 (Carnivora, Mustelidae) in the states of Pará and Rio de Janeiro (^{Machado-Filho, 1950}).

^{Schmidt (1972)} transferred the species P. dollfusi, P. gethi, P. lenti, P. procyonis, P. rugosus and P. septemserialis from the genus Prosthenorchis Travassos, 1915 to the genus Pachysentis. This taxonomical change was made mainly because these species do not possess a conspicuous festooned collar at the base of proboscis, and by having 12 longitudinal rows of hooks (in apical view), showing a total of between 42 and 102 hooks in the proboscis.

In the current study, we collected only female specimens of this acanthocephalan. The specimens studied have the similar morphometric (Table 1) and morphologic features of females of P. gethi described by ^{Machado-Filho (1950)}. In the specimens of the current study, we observed that the hooks of the first 4 rows have a double root, and the other rows are of simple root, the same was reported in the specimens of P. gethi described by ^{Machado-Filho (1950)}.

P. gethi was originally described as a parasite of the carnivore mustelid gray headed tayra (E. barbara) in a state of the northern region of Brazil (Pará), and in the state of Rio de Janeiro, in the southeast of Brazil. The type locality of this species is municipality of Aurá in the state of Pará. ^{Vieira et al. (2008)} when analysing samples of helminths of wild carnivore mammals from Brazil stored in CHIOC, observed specimens of P. gethi collected in E. barbara, G. cuja and the grisson Galictis vittata (Schreber, 1776) (Carnivora, Mustelidae). These last 2 hosts had not been reported as hosts of P. gethi by ^{Machado-Filho (1950)}, and were considered new hosts for this acanthocephalan species. However, the record labels of 2 samples of paratypes of P. gethi stored in CHIOC (Nos. 9203 and 17838) that were originally associated with E. barbara in the study of ^{Machado-Filho (1950)}, report that these were collected in specimens of G. cuja from the state of Rio de Janeiro. Therefore, these samples of G. cuja in the state of Rio de Janeiro were erroneously associated to E. barbara by ^{Machado-Filho (1950)}. Since the study by ^{Machado-Filho (1950)} which described P. gethi with samples of acanthocephalans collected during the first half of 20th century, this species had never been recorded again. Therefore, this study constitutes the rediscovery of this species of Pachysenthis after 65 years of a unique and last record.