SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.101 número1Variación de la morfología floral en cinco especies de Penstemon (Plantaginaceae) que muestran el síndrome de polinización de himenópterosLas plantas vasculares endémicas del estado de Sinaloa, México índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Botanical Sciences

versión On-line ISSN 2007-4476versión impresa ISSN 2007-4298

Bot. sci vol.101 no.1 México ene./mar. 2023  Epub 06-Feb-2023

https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.3114 

Structural botany

Comparative stem anatomy of three species of Coryphantha (Cactoideae-Cactaceae)

Anatomía comparativa del tallo de tres especies de Coryphantha (Cactoideae-Cactaceae)

José Emiliano Avila-Escobar, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft, Writing – review & editing1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9481-8764

Mayte Stefany Jiménez-Noriega, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft, Writing – review & editing2  * 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4642-1559

Alejandro De la Rosa-Tilapa, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1677-3572

1Facultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Tlalnepantla, Mexico.

2Jardín Botánico, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Cuautitlán, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuautitlán Izcalli, Mexico.


Abstract

Background:

The genus Coryphantha has the second largest number of species of the tribe Cacteae-Cactaceae. Morphologically, it has been reported that the stem presents mainly globose, ovoid and cylindric variations. However, at the anatomical level, descriptions are scarce and focused on particular tissues (epidermis or xylem). The aim of this work is to contribute to the anatomical knowledge of the genus.

Questions and/or Hypotheses:

What are the anatomical characteristics that differentiate one species from another? Does the presence of crystals allow differentiation between species?

Study species:

Coryphantha clavata, Coryphantha cornifera and Coryphantha radians.

Site and years of study:

San Luis Potosí and Querétaro, Mexico; 2017, 2020.

Methods:

Three individuals per species were collected, and conventional histological techniques were applied. Anatomical descriptions were made for different tissues, and structural characteristics were measured for each species.

Results:

The species exhibited the greatest differences in the epidermis and hypodermis, such as the presence of subepidermal stomata (C. radians), three-layered hypodermis (C. clavata), and non-collenchymatous hypodermis (C. cornifera). Crystals were not observed in the epidermises but instead in the hypodermes, which exhibited crystal shapes of druses (C. cornifera and C. radians), prisms and round bodies (C. clavata). In the cortical tissue, C. clavata had abundant mucilage cells. The observed xylem and phloem tissues exhibited characteristics similar to those of other Coryphantha species.

Conclusions:

The anatomical characteristics of the epidermis and hypodermis are considered of high systematic value and could be used to distinguish between species of the genus.

Key words: Cacteae; crystals; hypodermis; periderm; secondary xylem.

Resumen:

Antecedentes:

El género Coryphantha es el segundo con mayor número de especies de la tribu Cacteae-Cactaceae. Morfológicamente se ha descrito que el tallo presenta variaciones globosas, ovoides y cilíndricas principalmente. Sin embargo, a nivel anatómico las descripciones son escasas y enfocadas a un tejido en particular (epidermis o xilema). El objetivo este trabajo contribuir al conocimiento del género.

Preguntas y / o Hipótesis:

¿Cuáles son las características anatómicas que permiten diferenciar a una especie con respecto a otra? ¿La presencia de cristales permite la diferenciación entre las especies?

Especies de estudio:

Coryphantha clavata, Coryphantha radiansy Coryphantha cornifera

Sitio y años de estudio:

San Luis Potosí y Querétaro, México, 2017, 2020.

Métodos:

Se colectaron tres individuos por especie y se le aplicaron las técnicas histológicas convencionales. Las descripciones anatómicas se hicieron por tejidos y se midieron las características estructurales para las especies.

Resultados:

Las especies exhibieron diferencias en la epidermis e hipodermis como la presencia de estomas subepidérmicos (C. radians), hipodermis de tres estratos (C. clavata) e hipodermis no colenquimatosa (C. cornifera). No se observaron cristales en la epidermis, solo en la hipodermis, drusas (C. cornifera y C. radians), prismas y cuerpos redondos (C. clavata). En el córtex C. clavata presentó abundantes células de mucilago. El xilema y floema exhibieron características similares a las de otras especies de Coryphantha.

Conclusiones:

Las características anatómicas de la epidermis e hipodermis se consideran de alto valor sistemático y podrían utilizarse para separar otras especies del género.

Palabras clave: Cacteae; cristales; hipodermis; peridermis; xilema secundario

Coryphantha is the genus with the second highest species richness (only below Mammillaria) in the Cacteae tribe (Vázquez-Benítez et al. 2016); it is distributed from the southern United States down to Oaxaca in southern Mexico (Dicht & Lüthy 2005). The species of Coryphantha have predominantly globose, ovoid, cylindrical-ovoid and depressed globose stems (Bravo-Hollis & Sánchez- Mejorada 1991, Vázquez-Sánchez et al. 2012, Vázquez-Benítez et al. 2016, Sánchez et al. 2022). The tubercles exhibit different shapes and vary according to their position on the stem (Dicht & Lüthy 2005, Hunt et al. 2006, Vázquez-Benítez et al. 2016). However, cylindrical growth form prevails; in the youngest and older tubercles, they are conical and medial conical-deltoid (Vázquez-Benítez et al. 2016). Recently, a phylogenetic analysis of the recognized species of Coryphantha revealed that the genus is monophyletic, including 43 species recovered in two clades (Sánchez et al. 2022). At the anatomical level, it has been reported that the wood of Coryphantha is similar to that of other species of the Cacteae tribe, with solitary vessels embedded in a matrix of wide-band tracheids with little paratracheal parenchyma (Gibson 1973, Mauseth et al. 1995, Vázquez-Sánchez & Terrazas 2011). However, in the Cactaceae family, anatomical descriptions of the stem are scarce since most studies focus on a particular tissue (Terrazas & Arias 2002). For example, the cited studies on the description of the secondary xylem of various species of Coryphantha by Gibson (1973), the variation in the tracheary elements in relation to their position in the stem and in the tubercle (Terrazas et al. 2016) and the dimorphism of the areoles (Boke 1961). Descriptive studies of the secondary phloem for Cactoideae species are scarce (Mauseth & Ross 1988, Mauseth et al. 1998, Loza-Cornejo & Terrazas 1996, Mauseth 1996, Herrera-Cárdenas et al. 2000) since this tissue has characteristics that vary little at the family level (Mauseth 2006). Recently, in Cactaceae, studies on the epidermis and the types of crystals have become relevant, since these attributes have been described as characteristics with value in systematic analyses (Grego-Valencia et al. 2014, De la Rosa-Tilapa et al. 2018). Therefore, the aim of this work was to describe the anatomy of Coryphantha radians, Coryphantha cornifera and Coryphantha clavata, with the purpose of contributing to the knowledge of the anatomy of the genus.

Materials and methods

Three adult individuals per species were collected in different locations (Table 1). The Coryphantha clavata individuals were simple globose with 8-15 cm long and 10 cm in the wider diameter of the stem with a thick root; the Coryphantha cornifera individuals had stems that were up to 16 cm long and up to 8.6 cm in total diameter and the Coryphantha radians individuals had four branches with thick stems 5 to 8 cm in diameter and 8 cm long. The three species were in the same phenological stage (without flowering).

Table 1 Species of Coryphantha studied and collection locations. 

Species Collector number Location
C. radians (DC) Britton & Rose T. Terrazas 877 Out of Moctezuma a 5 km road to Morados, San Luis Potosí, Mexico
C. cornifera Briton S. Arias 1700 Highway Peñamiller-Cadereyta, Queretaro, Mexico
C. clavata (Scheidw.) Backeb. T. Terrazas 886 Road to Guadalcazar, road to mina from Gerardo, San Luis Potosí, Mexico
T. Terrazas 963 Highway to Santa Maria del Río-Tierra Quemada, San Luis Potosí
S. Arias 1672 Near Tula bridge, Tasquillo, Hidalgo, Mexico
S. Arias 1705 Near the pantheon, Cadereyta, Queretaro

Sections with areas of 3 × 3 cm corresponding to the basal, middle and apical parts of the stem of each species were cut and fixed with FAA (formaldehyde, 37 % glacial acetic acid, 95 % ethanol 95 % and distilled water; Ruzin 1999) for 48 hours. Then, they were washed with running water, sectioned into smaller portions up to the vascular cylinder and dehydrated with alcohol (70 % for one month). The alcohol solution was replaced every two weeks to reduce the mucilage content. The samples were cut with a double-edged knife to obtain transverse planes of the tubercle and stem as well as tangential and radial planes for each section of the stem. Subsequently, they were dehydrated in 96 and 100 % xylene and included in Paraplast®. The anatomical sections were 14 and 16 µm thick and were obtained using a rotary microtome (Leica RM2125RT, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). They were stained with safranin and fast green and mounted in synthetic resin according to methods previously reported by Loza-Cornejo & Terrazas (1996). Descriptions were made of the three regions (apical, middle, basal) of the epidermal, fundamental and vascular tissues. The terminology used for the description of the secondary xylem is in accordance with the International Association of Wood Anatomists (IAWA Committee 1989). For the epidermal characteristics, the terminology of Metcalfe & Chalk (1980, 1983) was used. The mean and standard error were obtained from 30 measurements per attribute per individual per species. Anatomical characters were quantified with a Zen Lite 3.0 image analyzer.

Results

Epidermis. In the transverse section, the cuticle was smooth for all three species, the thicknesses were as follows: 2.49 ± 0.30 µm for C. clavata, 2.75 ± 0.16 µm for C. cornifera and 3.0 ± 0.13 µm for C. radians. The epidermis was simple and rectangular, and the largest in C. radians (42. 05 ± 1.88 µm), followed by C. cornifera (35.24 ± 4.27 µm) and C. clavata (20.97 ± 2.2 µm), with the outer periclinal wall being more variable (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Epidermis and hypodermis of three species of Coryphantha, transverse sections. A, C. radians, B, C, E. C. clavata, D, F. C. cornifera, e = epidermis, h = hypodermis (square bracket), stoma, (white arrow), crystals = *. Bar: B-D, F = 20 µm, A, E = 50 µm. 

The outer periclinal wall was flat for all three species. The periclinal wall thickness was thicker for C. radians (11.84 ± 0.48 µm) than for C. cornifera (5.55 ± 0.21 µm) and C. clavata (4.68 ± 0.13 µm). For all three species, the stomata were superficial, while in C. radians, the stomata appeared to be sunken only at the base of the stem, and all three species had substomatal cavities throughout the hypodermis (Figure 1E).

Hypodermis. The number of hypodermal layers was variable from two layers in C. cornifera and C. radians to up to three layers in C. clavata (Figure 1B). The hypodermis of C. cornifera possessed parenchymatous cells (Figure 1D), while those of C. radians and C. clavata showed collenchymatous cells (Figure 1A-B). The hypodermal cells of C. cornifera and C. radians had crystal shapes of druses and druse clusters (Figure 1A, C), and only those of C. clavata had rounded and prismatic crystals (Figure 1B, C).

Cortex. All the taxa studied had palisade and storage parenchyma; in the storage parenchyma, collateral cortical bundles were found (Figure 2D). The cortical bundles may have secondary growth. In the xylem, we found few tracheary elements. The phloem was scarce and had sieve tube elements with a simple horizontal sieve plate and one companion cell per element. Mucilage cavities were observed for C. clavata, but they were absent for C. cornifera and C. radians.

Figure 2 Secondary xylem, secondary phloem and periderm in three species of Coryphantha, transverse and tangential sections. A-C. secondary xylem; D. cortical bundle; E, F. secondary phloem; G-I. Periderm. A, E, H. C. radians; B, D, I. C. cornifera; C, F, G. C. clavata. co = cortex, cp = conductive phloem, e = epidermis, h = hypodermis, ncp = nonconductive phloem, pe = periderm, ph = phloem, tpl = thick phellem cells, r = ray, white circle = vessel, wbt = wide band tracheids, x = xylem, yellow arrows = sieve tube element, red arrows = companion cell. Bar: A-C, G-I = 100 µm, F = 50 µm, D, E=20 µm. 

Pith. The pith had only parenchyma cells and medullary bundles were present; druses occurred for all three species as in the cortex but were more abundant for C. cornifera.

Secondary tissues. Secondary xylem.- For all three species, vessels were embedded in a matrix of wide-band tracheids (Figure 2A-C). The vessels were mostly solitary and narrow, with radial and tangential diameters of 33.42 ± 1.14 µm and 31.68 ± 1.43 µm for C. cornifera, 31.73 ± 0.97 µm and 31.25 ± 0.89 µm for C. clavata and 27.88 ± 1.81 µm and 29.26 ± 3.22 µm for C. radians, respectively. Vessel elements had simple perforation plates and helical or annular secondary wall thickenings (Figure 2D). The wide-band tracheids had the same type of secondary walls as the vessel elements with radial and tangential diameters of 40.35 ± 0.96 µm and 38.41 ± 1.23 µm for C. cornifera, 24.34 ± 0.72 µm and 23.42 ± 0.49 µm for C. clavata and 27.65 ± 0.86 µm and 26.06 ± 0.85 µm for C. radians. For C. radians, the primary and secondary rays are distinctive (Figure 2A). The rays were unlignified (2-4-seriate for C. radians, 2-6-seriate for C. clavata and 2-3- seriate for C. cornifera) and composed almost entirely of erect cells. Druses were observed in some ray cells for all three species.

Secondary phloem.- The phloem of all three studied species had sieve tube elements with companion cells (STE-CCs) and axial and radial parenchyma. In the conductive phloem, the STE-CCs were arranged in groups among the diffuse axial parenchyma cells; the CC occurred on one side of the STE (Figure 2E, F). The STEs had simple sieve plates, with small sieve areas on the sidewalls. In the nonconductive phloem, the STE-CCs collapsed and formed a furrow region between the dilate rays (Figure 2E, F).

Periderm.- For all three species, the periderm was unidirectional. The phellogen was epidermal in origin. The phellem showed thin-walled suberized cells alternating with one to two strata of very thick-walled lignified cells for C. clavata and C. radians (Figure 2G, H), while for C. cornifera, the lignified and suberized cells maintained thin walls, and the outer cells collapsed (Figure 2I).

Discussion

The cuticle thicknesses showed a variation of less than one µm among the three species studied here, and this variation was similar to that exhibited by Coryphantha pallida and Coryphantha retusa (Loza-Cornejo & Terrazas 2003). However, this cuticle thickness was greater (2.49 - 3.00 µm) than the cuticle thickness of 1.8 µm for Coryphantha elephantidens (Gasson 1981). Variations in cuticle thicknesses do not determine survival in arid and semiarid species (Gibson & Horak 1978). The cuticle was smooth for all three species, as for C. elephantidens (Gasson 1981), and did not present ornamentations, as for other Cactaceae species (Loza-Cornejo & Terrazas 2003). The presence or absence of cuticle ornamentations and papillose epidermis may allow recognition between genera. Such is the case for Peniocereus, genus where its seven species have a papillose epidermis and smooth cuticle (Loza-Cornejo & Terrazas 2003, Franco-Estrada et al. 2021). Whereas the former subgenus Pseudocanthocereus (now in Acanthocereus, Arias et al. 2005) has two species that have cuticles with micropapillae (Sánchez-Mejorada 1974), one of them Peniocereus fosterianus (=Acanthocereus) (Loza-Cornejo & Terrazas 2003). Acanthocereus needs further studies since A. chiapensis, A. horridus and A. tetragonus have a smooth cuticle (Loza-Cornejo & Terrazas 2003, Martínez-Quezada et al. 2020). The simple epidermises of the three species had greater sizes (height 20.97 µm, 42.05 µm width) than those reported for other species of Coryphantha (Gasson 1981, Loza-Cornejo & Terrazas 2003). The outer periclinal wall exhibited greater thickening than the rest of the walls that made up the epidermal cells. This thickening is common for various species of the Cactaceae family and requires future studies to determine the nature of the primary wall thickening and confirm whether it is collenchymatous with the ability to provide flexibility and storage of water (Leroux 2012). The superficial positions of the stomata are maintained along the stem for C. cornifera and C. clavata, which is similar to that recorded by Eggli (1984), while C. radians exhibited sunken stomata similar to Coryphantha elephantidens (Gasson 1981). If the stomata are sunken throughout the stem and this is a characteristic of the species, it should be studied in a greater number of species of the same genus to evaluate whether the sunken stomata are associated with species from drier habitats and could be an adaptation to reduce water loss through transpiration (Gibson 1983, Garcia et al. 2012).

The number of strata in the hypodermis was variable for C. clavata (three strata) with respect to the other two species; this variation was recorded for C. elephantidens with one stratum and two strata for C. pallida and C. retusa (Boke 1952, Gasson 1981, Loza-Cornejo & Terrazas 2003). The variations in the number of strata and thicknesses of the hypodermis are induced by the environment (Nyffeler & Eggli 1997). In addition, the hypodermis acts as a protective, supportive tissue that provides elasticity (Mauseth 1989, Vázquez-Sánchez et al. 2005) and is another defense mechanism against herbivory attack and excessive radiation, especially when associated with the accumulation of crystals in hypodermal cells (Pierantoni et al. 2017, De la Rosa-Tilapa et al. 2020). Loza-Cornejo & Terrazas (2003) recorded druses in the hypodermis of C. radians and C. retusa, which was also confirmed for C. radians in this work and for C. cornifera. In C. clavata prisms and rounded crystals were detected. Crystals in the hypodermis are of high diagnostic value (Terrazas & Arias 2002, De la Rosa-Tilapa et al.2020), so the study of the other species of Coryphantha will contribute to support the subclades within the genus according to the recent phylogeny proposed (Sánchez et al. 2022).

It is worth mentioning that C. clavata possessed abundant mucilage cells in the cortex, in agreement with the clade named mucilaginous by Sánchez et al. (2022). Coryphantha cornifera belongs to a species with a characteristic watery cortex. Our observations confirmed this: the cortices of the C. cornifera and C. radians individuals in this study lacked mucilage cells.

The tracheary elements of the three species showed the same anatomical characteristics already described for other Coryphantha species: for example, the vessel elements have simple perforation plates and helical thickening (Terrazas et al. 2016); the vessels were narrow and solitary, characteristic of species with small growth forms (Gibson 1973); the diameter of the vessels (27.88-33.42 µm radial, 29.26-31.68 µm tangential) in C. clavata was consistent with that reported by other authors (Gibson 1973, Terrazas et al. 2016). Wide-band tracheids showed wall thickening similar to that of the vessel elements. However, the diameter was greater than the diameter of the vessel elements, as was also reported for six species of Coryphantha by Terrazas et al. (2016). The authors mentioned that wide-band tracheids have the ability to contract and expand depending on the availability of water (Gibson 1973, Mauseth 2004) and the vessel elements will have the same ability since both have the same characteristics in the primary and secondary walls. The rays were not lignified and were arranged in series of 3 to 7, similar to the results of Terrazas et al. (2016), where they observed rays in series of 2 to 5 for the six species of Coryphantha studied; the rays were mainly composed of erect cells.

The divisions of the epidermis originate the periderm; this had already been reported for other cacti species (Gibson & Nobel 1986, Terrazas et al. 2005, Evans & Dombrovskiy 2020) and seems to be a conserved characteristic throughout the family relating to late development in the stems, especially of the Cactoideae subfamily (Terrazas & Arias 2002). Evans et al. (1994, 2001) suggested that early development of the periderm is associated with the accumulation of epicuticular waxes in the epidermis, which stimulates cell division and in turn the production of phellogen. It is interesting that, of the three species studied here, only one of them does not have thick-walled lignified cells, C. cornifera, which could be a diagnostic characteristic. To support this assertion, further studies should analyze the periderm of a greater number of species of Coryphantha.

In conclusion, we recognized only a few unique characteristics in each analyzed species to discriminate species. The differences found here between C. cornifera and C. radians may contribute to recognize them as distinct entities. For C. cornifera, the hypodermis is parenchymatous and no thick-walled phellem cells occur in the periderm, whereas C. radians has collenchymatous hypodermis and C. clavata possesses distinctive prisms and rounded crystals in the collenchymatous hypodermis and abundant mucilage cells in the cortex. The epidermis and hypodermis were the tissues that presented the greatest variation between species. The type of crystals and their location could be of value and may contribute to the systematics of the genus. The xylem and phloem seem to be highly conserved since the three species showed the same characteristics already described for other members of Coryphantha, but this is not so for the periderm, considering that the phellem cells can have very thick and lignified walls.

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by the Programa de Apoyo a Proyectos de Investigación e Innovación Tecnológica (Program to support Research, Technological and Innovation Projects), UNAM PAPIIT No IA202622 to MSJN. To Institute of Biology UNAM for their support in carrying out part of the lab work and to Teresa Terrazas (TT) for allowing to using the field material for this study (PAPIIT IN224307 to TT).

Literature Cited

Arias S, Terrazas T, Arreola-Nava HJ, Vázquez-Sánchez M, Cameron KM. 2005. Phylogenetic relationships in Peniocereus (Cactaceae) inferred from plastid DNA sequence data. Journal of Plant Research 118: 317-328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-005-0225-3 [ Links ]

Boke N. 1952. Leaf and areole development in Coryphantha. American Journal of Botany 39: 134-145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1952.tb14257.x [ Links ]

Boke N. 1961. Dimorphism in Coryphantha. American Journal of Botany 48: 593-603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2439372 [ Links ]

Bravo-Hollis H, Sánchez-Mejorada H. 1991. Las cactáceas de México . Vol. 3. 643p. D.F, México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. ISBN: 968-36-1760-3. [ Links ]

De la Rosa-Tilapa A, Maceda A, Terrazas T. 2020. Characterization of biominerals in Cactaceae Species by FTIR. Crystals 10: 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10060432 [ Links ]

De la Rosa-Tilapa A, Vázquez-Sánchez M, Terrazas T. 2018. Stem anatomy of Turbinicarpus s.l. (Cacteae, Cactaceae) and its contribution to systematics. Plant Biosystems 153: 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2018.1527791 [ Links ]

Dicht RF, Lüthy AD. 2005. Coryphantha Cacti of Mexico and Southern USA. Berlin, Germany: Springer Nature. ISBN 3-540-22306-1 [ Links ]

Eggli U. 1984. Stomatal types of Cactaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 146: 197-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989546 [ Links ]

Evans LS, Cantarella V, Stolte K, Thompson KH. 1994. Epidermal browning of saguaro cacti (Carnegiea gigantea): Surface and internal characteristics associated with browning. Environmental and Experimental Botany 34: 9-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-8472(94)90003-5 [ Links ]

Evans LS, Dombrovskiy P. 2020. Anatomical characteristics of sunglight-induced bark(periderm) coverages on columnar cacti of Central Mexico. Journal of Plant Studies 9: 20-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jps.v9n2p20 [ Links ]

Evans LS, Sullivan JH, Lim M. 2001. Initial effects of UV-B radiation on stem surfaces of Stenocereus thurberi (Organ Pipe cacti). Environmental and Experimental Botany 46: 81-187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-8472(01)00094-6 [ Links ]

Franco-Estrada D, Sánchez D, Terrazas T, Arias S. 2021. Phylogenetic analysis of Peniocereus (Cactaceae, Echinocereeae) based on five chloroplast DNA markers. Brazilian Journal of Botany 44: 903-916. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40415-021-00774-0 [ Links ]

Garcia J, Scremin-Dias E, Soffiatti P. 2012. Stem and root anatomy of two species of Echinopsis (Trichocereae: Cactaceae). Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 83: 1036-1044. DOI: https://doi.org/2010.7550/rmb.28124 [ Links ]

Gasson P. 1981. Epidermal anatomy of some North American globular cacti.The Cactus and Succulent Journal of Great Britain 43: 101-108. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42786735Links ]

Gibson A. 1973. Comparative anatomy of secondary xylem in Cactoideae (Cactaceae). Biotropica 5: 29-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2989678 [ Links ]

Gibson A. 1983. Anatomy of photosynthetic old stems of nonsucculent dicotyledons from North American deserts. Botanical Gazette 144: 347-362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/337383 [ Links ]

Gibson A, Horak K. 1978. Systematic anatomy and phylogeny of mexican columnar cacti. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 65: 999-1057. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2398781 [ Links ]

Gibson A, Nobel PS. 1986. The cactus primer. Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674281714 [ Links ]

Grego-Valencia D, Terrazas T, Vázquez-Sánchez S. 2014. Ferocactus (Cactaceae) epidermis: its systematic value. The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 141: 313-325. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3159/TORREY-D-1-00023.1 [ Links ]

Herrera-Cárdenas R, Terrazas T, Loza-Cornejo S. 2000. Anatomía comparada del tallo y de la raíz de las especies del género Neoevansia Marshal (Cactaceae). Boletín de la Sociedad Botánica de México 67: 5-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.1623 [ Links ]

Hunt DR, Taylor NP, Charles G. 2006. The new cactus lexicon. Milborne Port. UK: DH. Books. 373 p. ISBN: 9780953813445. [ Links ]

IAWA Committee. 1989. IAWA list of microscopic features for hardwood identification. IAWA Bulletin New Series 10: 219-332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-90000497 [ Links ]

Leroux O. 2012. Collenchyma: a versatile mechanical tissue with dynamic cell walls. Annals of Botany 110: 1083-1098. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcs186 [ Links ]

Loza-Cornejo S, Terrazas T. 1996. Anatomía del tallo y de la raíz de dos especies de Wilcoxia Britton & Rose (Cactaceae) del noreste de México. Boletín de la Sociedad Botánica de México 59: 13-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.1502 [ Links ]

Loza-Cornejo S, Terrazas T. 2003. Epidermal and hypodermal characteristics in North American Cactoideae (Cactaceae). Journal of Plant Research 116: 27-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-002-0066-2 [ Links ]

Martínez-Quezada DM, Arias S, Korotkova N, Terrazas T. 2020. The phylogenetic significance of the stem morpho-anatomy in the Hylocereeae (Cactoideae, Cactaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 306: 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-020-01639-x [ Links ]

Mauseth JD. 1989. Comparative Structure-function studies within a strongly dimorphic plant, Melocactus intortus (Cactaceae). British Cactus and Succulent Society 7: 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25223/brad.n7.1989.a1 [ Links ]

Mauseth JD. 1996. Comparative anatomy of tribes Cereeae and Browningieae (Cactaceae). Bradleya 14: 66-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25223/brad.n14.1996.a9 [ Links ]

Mauseth JD. 2004. Wide-band tracheids are present in almost all species of Cactaceae. Journal of Plant Research 117: 69-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-003-0131-5 [ Links ]

Mauseth JD. 2006. Structure-function relationships in highly modified shoots of Cactaceae. Annals of Botany 98: 901-926. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcl133 [ Links ]

Mauseth JD, Ross R. 1988. Systematic anatomy of the primitive cereoid cactus Leptocereus quadricostatus. Bradleya 6: 49-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25223/brad.n6.1988.a2 [ Links ]

Mauseth JD, Terrazas T, Loza-Cornejo S. 1998. Anatomy of relictual members of subfamily Cactoideae, IOS Group 1a (Cactaceae). Bradleya 16: 31-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25223/brad.n16.1998.a5 [ Links ]

Mauseth J, Uozumi Y, Plemons BJ, Landrum JV. 1995. Structural and systematic study of an unusual tracheid type in cacti. Journal of Plant Research 108: 517-526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02344242 [ Links ]

Metcalfe CR, Chalk L.1980. Anatomy of the Dicotyledons: Systematic Anatomy of Leaf and Stem, with a Brief History of the Subject. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press. ISBN 10: 0198543832 / ISBN 13: 9780198543831 [ Links ]

Metcalfe CR, Chalk L. 1983. Anatomy of the Dicotyledons: Wood Structure and Conclusion of the General Introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press .296. ISBN 10: 0198545592 / ISBN 13: 9780198545590 [ Links ]

Nyffeler R, Eggli U. 1997. Comparative stem anatomy and systematics of Eriosyce sensu lato (Cactaceae). Annals of Botany 80: 767-786. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1997.0518 [ Links ]

Pierantoni M, Tenne R, Brumfeld V, Kiss V, Oron D, Addadi L, Weiner S. 2017. Plant sand light manipulation: the integrated mineral system in okra leaves. Advanced Sciences 4: 1-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201600416 [ Links ]

Ruzin SE. 1999. Plant microtechnique and microscopy. New York. USA: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195089561. [ Links ]

Sánchez D, Vázquez-Benítez B, Vázquez-Sánchez M, Aquino D, Arias S. 2022. Phylogenetic relationships in Coryphantha and implications on Pelecyphora and Escobaria (Cacteae, Cactoideae, Cactaceae). Phytokeys 188: 115-165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.188.75739 [ Links ]

Sánchez-Mejorada H. 1974. El género Peniocereus, historia y revisión preliminar. Toluca, México: Dirección de Agricultura y Ganadería, Gobierno del Estado de México. ISBN 9683617581 [ Links ]

Terrazas T, Arias S. 2002. Comparative stem anatomy in the subfamily Cactoideae. The Botanical Review 68: 444-473. [ Links ]

Terrazas T, Escamilla-Molina R, Vázquez-Sánchez M. 2016. Variation in the trachearyelements in species of Coryphantha (Cacteae-Cactoideae) with contrasting morphology: the bottleneck model. Brazilian Journal of Botany 39: 669-678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40415-016-0249-z [ Links ]

Terrazas T, Loza-Cornejo S, Arreola-Nava H. 2005. Anatomía caulinar de las especies del género Stenocereus (Cactaceae). Acta Botánica Venezuelica 28: 321-336. [ Links ]

Vázquez-Benítez B, Arias S, Cervantes-Sandoval A. 2016. Variación Morfológica de Coryphantha (Cactaceae): Un enfoque multivariado. Acta Botanica Mexicana 116: 21-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21829/abm116.2016.1117 [ Links ]

Vázquez-Sánchez M, Terrazas T. 2011. Stem and wood allometric relationships in Cacteae (Cactaceae). Trees 25: 755-767. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-011-0553-y [ Links ]

Vázquez-Sánchez M, Terrazas T, Arias S. 2005. Morfología y anatomía del cefalio de Cephalocereus senilis (Cactaceae). Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid 62: 153-161. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/ajbm.2005.v62.i2.16 [ Links ]

Vázquez-Sánchez M, Terrazas T, Arias S. 2012. El hábito y la forma de crecimiento de la Tribu Cactaceae (Cactaceae, Cactoideae). Botanical Sciences 90: 97-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.477 [ Links ]

Received: June 22, 2022; Accepted: December 01, 2022; Published: October 26, 2022

*Corresponding author: mayajimenez13@yahoo.com

Associate editor: Monserrat Vazquez Sánchez

Author contributions: JEAE and MSJN designed the paper and performed tissue analysis; JEAE performed measurements and calculated basic statistics; ADLR contributed to tissue interpretation; JEAE and MSJN prepared the first draft; all coauthors discussed, reviewed, and approved the manuscript.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License