Introduction
Animal welfare concerns associated with transport stress include limited access to feed and water, variable climatic conditions, noise, vibrations, poor handling and social stress.1-4 Physiological effects include hypoglycemia, dehydration, energy depletion, protein degradation, electrolyte imbalance and stress response activation.5,6
Allostasis is the readjustment of requirements in response to stress to maintain an optimal physiological state.7 An allostatic modulator (AM) regulates the physiological stress response to maintain allostasis.8 Several AM substances have been developed, such as dopaminergic antagonists9 and β-adrenergic receptor blockers.10 In addition, vitamins,11-13 microelements,14,15 and amino acids13 have also been tested. Improvements have been observed recently in blood indicators and meat color parameters in 18- to 20-month-old bulls fed with 10 g/head/d of an AM composed of acetylsalicylic acid, ascorbic acid, sodium chloride and potassium chloride for 30 d preslaughter.16
Acetylsalicylic acid inhibits the cyclooxygenase pathway,17 contributing to the regulation of ACTH release18 and reducing stress. Additionally, Pardue19 has proposed that ascorbic acid might suppress adrenocortical steroidogenesis. Finally, electrolyte administration before slaughter stabilizes serum components.20 We performed a preliminary evaluation of how the aforementioned AM diluted in the drinking water of young bulls for 7 d after long-haul transport affected the bulls’ physiological stress response.
Materials and methods
Animal use was regulated by the Subcomité Interno para el Cuidado y Uso de los Animales para Experimentación of the Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia (SICUAE - FMVZ) at the Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (UNAM).
Animals
Seventy-seven commercial crosses of 16- to 18-month-old bulls (Bos indicus (Brahman and Nellore) and Bos taurus (Charolais, Swiss Brown and Simmental)) with an average weight of 335 ± 34 kg (mean ± SE) were held for 3 h in holding pens at a breeding farm in the state of Campeche, Mexico, where they were also raised. Animals showed a calm temperament, and they responded well to human interaction. In the summer (mean temperature of 34.5°C), bulls were loaded onto a commercial cattle truck (2.7 m wide x 18 m long trailer, six compartments, anti-slip flooring and roof) in groups of 10-14 animals per compartment without mixing unknown individuals. Bulls were transported 1100 km on paved roads to a feedlot cattle ranch in the state of Veracruz, Mexico. The trip lasted 20.42 h, including a 9-h waiting period inside the truck for customs. Bulls had no access to food or water during transport. Upon arrival, animals were unloaded by three operators using a concrete ramp to a holding pen using either electric prods (54 animals) or a wooden stick (46 animals).
Once in the holding pen, 21 animals were randomly chosen and divided into three groups of seven, which were directed to different pens through 0.85-m-wide alleyways of approximately 3 m in length using electric prods (15 animals) or a wooden stick (6 animals). Feedlot pens were 30 m x 20 m with a 20 m long feeder of approximately 0.5 m diameter, a 3 m x 1 m x 0.9 m water trough, soil floors and a 3-m-high metal roof (30% shadow). During experimentation, feed composed of 45% high-quality hay and 55% concentrates (sorghum, corn and soybean plus vitamin and mineral premixes) was provided ad libitum.
Treatments
Groups received different doses of AM: Control (C) = 0 g/head/d, G2 = 30 g/head/d and G3 = 60 g/head/d. The AM was composed of acetylsalicylic acid (140 g), ascorbic acid (100 g), sodium chloride (128 g) and potassium chloride (128 g). After calculating the volume of water/head/pen (10% of the animal’s body weight21), AM was diluted in 100 L of water (210 g/100 L for G2 and 420 g/100 L for G3). Once diluted, AM dilutions or water were placed in the corresponding drinking troughs for ad libitum consumption immediately after placement into pens. Since the experiment was carried out under commercial conditions, the amount of water consumed per animal was not possible to calculate; therefore, it was assumed that the animals’ daily water intake was the average reported in other studies assessing this variable.22 Drinking troughs of all groups were cleaned and filled with new dilutions or water (C) daily. Animals were subjected to treatments for 7 d immediately after transport.
Behavioral assessment
Ethograms were determined during an ad libitum sampling.23 Behavior was assessed for 6 h daily (1100 to 1700 h) beginning the day animals were placed into pens to receive water treatments during a 7-d period. Three different observers placed at 10 m from the pen (one observer per pen, observers rotating among pens, interobserver reliability: R=0.95, P < 0.05) carried out observations. Individual behavior was evaluated using scan sampling every 10 min, and focal sampling was used to obtain frequencies of social interactions (5.5 ± 0.19 h (mean ± SE) of focal observation/animal).23 Individual behaviors recorded were walking, standing, lying, drinking (head in water trough) and eating (head in feeding trough). Social interactions recorded were agonistic (head-butts to head and/or flank of a pen-mate) and affiliative (licking and/or sniffing any body part of a pen-mate). After data collection, proportions of time of individual behaviors were obtained by calculating the number of scans for each behavior divided by total scans, whereas the frequencies of social interactions were obtained by calculating the number of interactions divided by hours of observation/animal.23
Blood sample collection and analyses of cellular components and biochemical indicators
Blood samples were taken on day 1 (D1, before AM administration), D3, D5 and D7. Using a squeeze chute, four 5-ml blood samples from the tail vein were collected into sterile vacutainer tubes. Three tubes contained ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and were stored at 4°C. Afterwards, total leukocyte, neutrophil, eosinophil and lymphocyte counts were obtained according to Núñez and Bouda.24 The neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio (N:L) was also calculated.
EDTA-free tubes were centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 10 min at room temperature. After centrifugation, serum was collected into 5-ml sterile vials and stored at 0°C. Plasma glucose concentrations were determined using the GOD-PAP test without deproteinization (GL 2623, RANDOX®). Creatine kinase activity (CK) was determined by the CK-NAC activated method (RANDOX®). Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) activity was measured by the GOT method (RANDOX®). The lactate concentration was determined by hydrogen peroxide production during lactate to pyruvate transformation (RANDOX® Manual RXMONZA). Plasma cortisol (µg/dl) was determined using a competitive immunoassay technique.25 Plates were read using a Vitalab 10 spectrophotometer (Vital Scientific, Dieren, the Netherlands) at 505 nm for glucose; 340 nm for CK, AST and lactate; and 410 nm for cortisol. The evaluation of glucose, CK, lactate and plasma cortisol concentrations and the assessment of AST activity were performed using reagents previously validated in a prior study performed by this group.16
Statistical analysis
Differences in proportions of time of individual behavior and frequencies of social interactions by treatment were tested using the Kruskal-Wallis test (KW). If significant (P < 0.05), pairs of mean ranks were compared using the Dunn-Bonferroni (DB) test adjusted with the Bonferroni correction. A linear effects mixed model (LEM) with ‘AM dose’, ‘sampling day’, and ‘AM dose*sampling day’ as factors and ‘bull’ as a random factor was established to evaluate the effects in blood cellular components and biochemical indicators. F-values were approximated using the Kenward-Roger procedure as a standard SPSS method, thereby obtaining noninteger values for the denominator degrees of freedom. Residuals were tested for normal distribution with the Shapiro-Wilk test, and if not normally distributed (P ≤ 0.05), data were transformed using square root or logarithm10, whichever most effectively returned residuals to a normal distribution. When LEM results were significant, a post hoc Bonferroni test was used to compare means (P ≤ 0.05). If residuals were not normal after transformation, values were analyzed with KW as explained above. Calculations were performed with the program IBM SPSS statistics, version 20.
Results and discussion
AM effects on animal behavior
Despite the presence of cofounding factors, such as possible behavioral differences between sampling and nonsampling days, which were not estimated due to the observational methodology that we were able to perform under commercial conditions, these results suggest an effect of the allostatic modulator on behavior and physiology that needs to be further evaluated in better controlled conditions.
Time standing was greater in G3 than in C, with G2 being the intermediate, and the lying time was shorter in G3 than in C. G3 also had the highest frequency of behavioral events. The frequency of agonistic interactions was higher in G2 and significantly lower in G3, with C being the intermediate (Table 1). Fifteen hours of transport has been shown to produce less standing time in cattle than 2.7 h of transport.26 The longer standing and shorter lying times in G3 suggest faster recovery from transport stress with 60 g/head/d of AM. Fewer agonistic interactions in G3 than in G2 suggest less agitated animals with the highest AM dose, as some of the AM components, such as acetylsalicylic acid and ascorbic acid, have been shown to decrease stress-related behavior in lambs27 and goats.28 However, the results are unclear because G3 was not different from C. Further research is needed to clarify the possible benefits of AM supplementation on behavior.
Behaviour | Treatments (AM dose) | SEM | χ2 DF (PKW) Treatments | Z (PDB) G1 vs G2 | Z (PDB) G1 vs G3 | Z (PDB) G3 vs G2 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C (g/head/day) | G2 (30 g/head/ day) | G3 (60 g/head/ day) | ||||||
Eating (mean rank of proportion of time) | 10 | 13 | 10 | - | 4.22 (0.12) | - | - | - |
(% proportion of time) | 18.70 | 21.28 | 22.91 | 0.21 | - | - | - | - |
Drinking (mean rank of proportion of time) | 10.07 | 11.36 | 11.57 | 9 | 0.242 (0.89) | - | - | - |
(% proportion of time) | 1.51 | 1.69 | 1.64 | 0.29 | - | - | - | - |
Walking (median of proportion of time) | 11.14 | 9.29 | 12.57 | - | 0.992 (0.607) | - | - | - |
(% proportion of time) | 3.21 | 2.61 | 3.63 | 0.65 | - | - | - | - |
Standing (mean rank of proportion of time) | 5.71a | 12.57ab | 14.71b | - | 8.042 (0.02) | -2.71 (0.12) | -2.71 (0.02) | -0.65 (0.9) |
(% proportion of time) | 15.25 | 20.43 | 25.80 | 0.22 | - | - | - | - |
Lying (mean rank of proportion of time) | 17.43a | 9.86ab | 5.71b | - | 12.8312 (0.002) | 2.28 (0.067) | 3.53 (0.001) | 1.25 (0.64) |
(% proportion of time) | 53.39 | 41.11 | 35.75 | 0.27 | - | - | - | - |
Behavioural events (mean rank of events/h) | 11.29ab | 4.29a | 17.43b | - | 15.752 (0.0001) | 2.11 (0.104) | -1.85 (0.2) | -3.97 (0.0001) |
(events/h) | 4.01 | 2.25 | 7.48 | 0.73 | - | - | - | - |
Agonistic interactions (mean rank of interactions/h) | 10.36ab | 17.41a | 5.50b | - | 12.942 (0.002 | -2.09 (0.11) | 1.49 (0.4) | 3.58 (0.001) |
(events/h) | 0.32 | 0.87 | 0.05 | 0.11 | - | - | - | - |
Affiliative interactions (mean rank of interactions/h) | 14.21 | 10.64 | 8.14 | - | 4.452 (0.108) | - | - | - |
(events/h) | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.03 | 0.05 | - | - | - | - |
Pairs of ranks were contrasted using the Dunn-Bonferroni tests (DB).
χ2 DF = Chi squared value Degrees of Freedom.
PKW = P value for the Kruskal-Wallis test
PDB = P value for the Dunn-Bonferroni tests with Bonferroni correction.
Standard Error of the Mean = SEM.
Means that do no share a letter are significantly different (P < 0.05).
Effect of AM on blood components
Leukocytes were positively correlated with neutrophils (ρ=0.79, P < 0.001) and lymphocytes (ρ=0.69, P = 0.001). The eosinophil count remained unaffected (χ2 DF = 3.2222, PKW = 0.2). No significant differences between treatments or treatment by sampling days were found for blood cellular components, although leukocyte and neutrophil count and the N:L ratio changed across sampling days (Table 2).
BLOOD COMPONENT | MEANS | SED | F NDF, DDF (P VALUE) | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C (0 g/head/day) | G2 (30 g/head/day) | G3 (60 g/head/day) | AM dose | Sampling day | AM dose * Sampling day | |||||||||||
D1 | D3 | D5 | D7 | D1 | D3 | D5 | D7 | D1 | D3 | D5 | D7 | |||||
Cellular | ||||||||||||||||
Leukocytes (x 109/L) | 15.14 | 11.14 | 11.57 | 9.43 | 16.00 | 14.43 | 10.71 | 10.29 | 16.57 | 14.00 | 13.29 | 10.00 | 1.140 | 1.831,19 (0.19) | 15.48 3,54 (0.0001) | 0.74 6,54 (0.59) |
Neutrophils (x 109/L) | 6.43 | 4.14 | 4.00 | 3.14 | 6.57 | 5.29 | 3.00 | 2.86 | 8.57 | 5.71 | 4.29 | 3.00 | 0.715 | 1.382,18 (0.28) | 26.31 3,54 (0.0001) | 1.16 6,54 (0.34) |
Lymphocytes (x 109/L) | 7.86 | 6.57 | 7.29 | 5.43 | 7.71 | 8.57 | 6.71 | 6.57 | 7.14 | 6.71 | 8.43 | 6.43 | 0.961 | 0.352,18 (0.71) | 1.52 3,54 (0.22) | 0.83 6.54 (0.55) |
N:L ratio | 0.98 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.74 | 0.63 | 0.45 | 0.48 | 1.22 | 0.72 | 0.53 | 0.607 | 0.130 | 1.142,17.79 (0.34) | 11.92 3,52.09 (0.0001) | 1.09 6,52.08 (0.38) |
Biochemical | ||||||||||||||||
Glucose (mmol/L) | 5.86 | 4.28 | 3.14 | 4.28 | 6.57 | 4.57 | 4.57 | 4.43 | 6.14 | 4.85 | 4.00 | 5.29 | 0.433 | 1.542,18 (0.24) | 22.48 3,54 (0.0001) | 1.17 6,54 (0.34) |
CK (log10 [U/L + 1]) | 2.68 | 2.82 | 2.07 | 2.31 | 2.41 | 2.13 | 2.15 | 2.05 | 2.55 | 2.32 | 2.13 | 2.27 | 0.136 | 3.912,17.61 (0.04) | 6.68 3,52.41 (0.001) | 1.62 6,52.35 (0.16) |
(U/L) | 477.63 | 659.69 | 116.49 | 203.17 | 257.04 | 133.89 | 140.25 | 111.202 | 353.81 | 207.93 | 133.89 | 185.21 | - | - | - | - |
Lactate (mmol/L) | 8.07 | 6.11 | 6.69 | 7.29 | 9.21 | 6.79 | 7.27 | 9.83 | 9.04 | 6.43 | 8.09 | 8.14 | 1.359 | 0.512,19.71 (0.61) | 2.32 3,41.17 (0.89) | 0.28 6,41.06 (0.94) |
Cortisol (õg/dL) | 1.54 | 2.06 | 1.53 | 2.02 | 1.77 | 1.92 | 1.82 | 1.34 | 2.17 | 1.88 | 1.83 | 2.01 | 0.254 | 0.602 2,17.22 (0.55) | 0.58 3,50.86 (0.63) | 1.33 6,50.81 (0.26) |
(µg/dL) | 2.37 | 4.24 | 2.34 | 4.08 | 3.13 | 3.69 | 3.31 | 1.79 | 4.71 | 3.53 | 3.35 | 4.04 | - | - | - | - |
SED = Standard Error of the Difference.
F = F value.
NDF, DDF = Numerator Degrees of Freedom, Denominator Degrees of Freedom.
Changes in cell counts over time are related to stress adaptation.29,30 Correlations between leukocyte, neutrophil and lymphocyte counts, as well as the release of catecholamines during stress, have been previously found.31,32 The AM had no effects on cellular components, despite previous studies in which ascorbic acid administered 12 h before transport helped maintain blood cellular counts close to prestress levels in goats.33 In our study, cattle received AM after transport, which could have made a difference in AM efficacy. Further research testing AM supplementation at different times is necessary.
Effects of AM on biochemical serum indicators
CK activity was higher in C than in G2, with G3 being the intermediate (P = 0.04). No differences in the other indicators were observed with AM supplementation. Glucose concentration was higher on D1 than on the rest of the days (P = 0.0001, FNDF, DDF = 22.48 3, 54; D1 = 6.19 mmol/L, D3 = 4.57 mmol/L, D5 = 3.905 mmol/L, D7 = 4.67 mmol/L). CK activity was higher on D1 than on D5 and D7, with the lowest activity on D5 (P = 0.001, FNDF, DDF = 6.68 3, 52.41; D1 = 353.8 U/L, D3 = 262.6 U/L, D5 = 129.01 U/L, D7 = 161.929 U/L). The sampling day affected AST activity, as the values were significantly higher on D1 and D2 than on D5 and D7 (χ2 DF = 29.643, PKW < 0.001; mean ranks: D1 = 62.07 U/L, D3 = 50.71 U/L, D5 = 27.52 U/L, D7 = 29.69 U/L).
CK activity relates to muscle damage34 and increases after transport in a positive correlation with transport time.30 To date, there is no information on the effects of these AM components on CK activity after transport; our study suggests that 30 g/head/d AM reduces CK activity in cattle. However, as Ck activity did not differ between the highest AM dose and the C, further research is needed to understand the effects of different doses on this biochemical marker.
Glucose tendencies over time relate to the initial gluconeogenesis related to stress and its eventual return to normal concentrations.35-37 CK and AST activities also decrease over time after transport stress.38 For cortisol, while no effects have been reported in relation to road travel,30 as observed in this study, other studies have shown increases35-39 or decreases37 in cortisol levels shortly after transport. Thus, further research is needed to understand cortisol activity after transport stress and the effects of AM supplementation.
Conclusions
This experiment was carried out under commercial conditions, and it was not possible to separate transport from handling stress, nor the stress associated with the use of prods or wooden sticks for individuals; however, our aim was to evaluate the efficiency of the AM on animals, regardless of the source of stress. Likewise, the conditions in which this experiment was carried out did not enable us to evaluate the amount of water consumed per animal, and it was assumed that animals’ daily water intake was the average reported in other studies assessing this variable.22 Despite these and other possible cofounding factors associated with the methodological features of this study, it was observed that an AM dose of 60 g/head/d increased the average proportion of standing time and decreased the average proportion of lying time, suggesting that AM treatment could be associated with faster recovery rates after transport. The behavioral changes observed in this study need to be evaluated over time in further studies. For blood parameters, CK activity decreased with the lower but not the highest AM dose, suggesting a degree of effect on transport stress. Cortisol remained unaffected; however, as cortisol activity post transport has been reported to be highly variable, AM effects remain unclear for this marker and need to be explored in depth in future studies. Overall, this preliminary study suggests that AM administration for 7 d after 20.42 h of transport can affect the behavior and blood components of cattle. Subsequent studies need to consider greater sample sizes, different methods of AM administration in which water ingestion per animal can be measured and behavioral evaluations that include dominance and hierarchies within groups as covariates.