Introduction
The patient centered interviewing and physical examination, with appropriate laboratory exams, and radiologic testing, represent the cornerstone of medical diagnosis. However, we should be aware that any method has its own constraints. In the usual medical practice, the causes of inguinal lymphadenopathy are infectious, autoimmune, or neoplastic disorders1. In the latest, it is extremely unusual to cope with the primary malignant spermatic cord neoplasms, even for urologists2. However, in these uncommon tumors, there are exceptional ways of presentation seldom seen3,4.
Case presentation
A 66-years-old male patient presented with his family physician with a 3-year history of a left groin slow-growing lump; just recently, the swelling generated pain. The general practitioner established the clinical diagnosis of lymphadenopathy, and the patient was sent to our service. On the physical examination, a hard, irregular, and immovable 19-cm groin swelling, extending to the upper pole of the homolateral testis, was found (Fig. 1A); excluding local discomfort, the patient denied any other symptom. A computed tomography revealed a solid tumor affecting the spermatic cord, groin lymph nodes, abdominal wall, and epididymis (Fig. 1B). With this evidence, a wide groin tumor excision including an inguinal radical orchiectomy was scheduled. During surgery, the left testis with its spermatic cord was extirpated, with an abdominal wall segment, in block with the superficial groin lymph nodes to obtain macroscopic free margins (Fig. 2A); post-operative evolution was uneventful. The surgical specimen revealed a spermatic cord tumor spreading to abdominal muscle wall, lymph nodes, and epididymis (Fig. 2B); using immunohistochemical studies, a malignant fibrous histiocytoma of the spermatic cord was diagnosed (Fig. 2C). Considering the tumor size, and invasion to surrounding structures, the patient received adjuvant radiotherapy. For 14 months, the patient was tumor-free. Later, a right groin 2-cm lymphadenopathy appeared and was extirpated; a metastasis of the malignant fibrous histiocytoma was diagnosed. A radical inguinal lymph node dissection was suggested, but the patient declined the surgery. Radiotherapy was applied on the right groin; unfortunately, even though all treatments, the patient progressed and died.
Discussion
The spermatic cord malignant tumors are rare1. In general, these tumors are of considerable size, and they originate below the external inguinal ring growing into the scrotum, and rarely prevailing as a groin mass as in our case.
Like in this case, clinical impression is not enough to identify spermatic cord malignant tumors1,3. Therefore, imaging studies as ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance are valuable tools to attempt their diagnosis1,3. Nonetheless, these lesions have not pathognomonic imaging findings and is difficult to obtain a pre-operative diagnosis. Therefore, surgical excision is essential for a precise histological diagnosis1,3.
The indicated surgical management for spermatic cord sarcomas is radical inguinal orchiectomy with high ligation of the spermatic cord, including a wide excision of surrounding soft tissue to reach negative microscopic surgical margins1,3,5. Long-term follow-up is advocated given their excessive recurrence rates3. Disappointingly, adjuvant treatments like radiotherapy and chemotherapy have little value1.
The malignant fibrous histiocytoma of spermatic cord is exceptional1,3. There have been reported few cases and most occurred in the elderly4. This neoplasm tends to cause lymph node metastases6; therefore, regional lymph node dissection may improve local control of this disease according to some surgeons6. Due to spermatic cord malignant fibrous histiocytoma rarity, there are no agreed treatment principles, and their generally prognosis is poor7,8.