SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.30 número4Anomalías electrocardiográficas en hemorragia subaracnoideaSignificado clínico versus estadístico índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Cardiovascular and metabolic science

versión On-line ISSN 2954-3835versión impresa ISSN 2683-2828

Cardiovasc. metab. sci vol.30 no.4 Ciudad de México oct./dic. 2019  Epub 12-Ago-2024

 

Review

Hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation and public access defibrillation, the need for cardio-protected areas implementation in Mexico

RCP sólo con las manos y DEA de acceso público, la necesidad de implementar áreas cardio-protegidas en México

Humberto Rodríguez-Reyes1  * 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3164-8515

Mayela Muñoz-Gutiérrez2 

Enrique Asensio-Lafuente3 

1 Cardiology, Electrophysiology and Internal Medicine, FACC, FHRS, AHA Instructor of BLS (basic life support) and ACLS (advances cardiovascular life support), AHA, LHRS, ESC member. Coordinador del capítulo de paro cardiaco, muerte súbita y reanimación cardiopulmonar de la Asociación Nacional de Cardiólogos de México (ANCAM). Sociedad Cardiovascular y Arritmias (SOCAyA). Aguascalientes, México. ORCID: 0000-0003-3164-8515.

2 Cardiology and Cardiac Rehabilitation. Sociedad Cardiovascular y Arritmias (SOCAyA). Aguascalientes, México.

3 Cardiology and Electrophysiology, FHRS. Hospital H+ Querétaro, México.


Abstract:

Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) is one of the main worldwide health problems. It is estimated that it is responsible for 30% of cardiovascular deaths and up to 20% of total adult mortality. The chance of survival for a SCA victim is related to the timely interventions after the event in the first 5 minutes there is a greater chance of survival of the victims. Hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and public access automated external defibrillator (AED) use, are so far the best strategy to increase the victim’s survival in an out-of-hospital setting. In this work, the meaningful role of hands-only CPR and public access AED to increase the SCA victim’s survival in the community are reviewed, as well as the importance of implementing cardio-protected areas in Mexico.

Keywords: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; automated external defibrillator; sudden cardiac arrest; sudden death

Resumen:

El paro cardiaco súbito (PCS) es uno de los mayores problemas de salud a nivel mundial. Se estima que es responsable de 30% de mortalidad cardiovascular y de 20% de la mortalidad total en los adultos. La posibilidad de recuperación para una víctima de PCS depende del tiempo en que se inicie la atención posterior a ocurrido el evento, en los primeros cinco minutos se tiene mayor posibilidad de supervivencia de las víctimas. La reanimación cardiopulmonar (RCP) sólo con las manos y el uso de desfibrilador externo automático (DEA) de acceso público son la mejor estrategia para lograr proporcionar atención temprana y mejorar la supervivencia de las víctimas de un PCS dentro y fuera de un hospital. En el presente artículo se revisa la importancia de la RCP sólo con las manos y del uso de DEA de acceso público para mejorar la supervivencia de las víctimas de PCS en la comunidad, así como la importancia de implementar áreas cardio-protegidas en México.

Palabras clave: Reanimación cardiopulmonar; desfibrilador externo automático; paro cardiaco súbito; muerte súbita

Introduction

Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) is one of the main worldwide health problems. It is estimated that there are almost 5.3 million cases every year,1 thus being responsible for 30% of the cardiovascular deaths and 20% of the total global adult mortality.2 Most of SCA patients end-up as sudden death (SD) victims, and this outcome is frequently among subjects that do not benefit from early CPR and AED.3 Currrently, more patients show non-shockable rhythms such as asystole or pulseles electric activity (PEA) as the cause of SCA at home, where almost 80% of the community cardiac arrests occur.4 Nonetheless, SCA might also be related to a shockable rhythm as ventricular fibrillation (VF) or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (pVT) that are regularly encountered in the out-of-home place setting or related to sports activities. This represents nearly 20% of the community’s SCA events among children and adults.5,6 At the present time, the chance of survival for SCA victims is less than 10%,7,8 but this can be significantly improved among victims with a shockable rhythm (VF, pVT) that are early treated with CPR and AED.8,9

Hands-only CPR and «chain of survival» in the community

It has been demonstrated that hands-only CPR in the community is as effective as CPR with compressions and ventilation support,10 thus making it the preferred method among lay-persons.11,12 Usually, the out-of-hospital care sequence for SCA is initiated with the early detection of the victim, emergency medical services activation (call 911 in Mexico), asking for an AED and start CPR, with particular emphasis on chest compressions and use of the AED as soon as it is available (Table 1). When a SCA victim with a shockable rhythm is treated within the first two minutes after the cardiac arrest, the survival rates might go as high as 71% with an adequate neurological recovery.13 In Mexico, several efforts have been made in different communities to improve SCA survival. For example, in the city of Querétaro, several massive CPR public training sessions have been organized since 2008 to date. The survival rate of patients went from 0% to an initial marginal improvement in survival.14,15

Table 1: SCA victim attention in the community, Hands-only CPR and public access AED. 

1. Acknowledge the SCA victim (sudden collapse, non-responsive, does not move, does not breathe, is pale or cyanotic)
2. Call the local Emergency Medical Services number (Mexico 911), ask for an AED and put the call on speaker to receive assistance from the dispatcher
3. Initiate chest compressions in the center of the chest, between both nipples, at a 100 to 120 compressions per minute rate, with 5 to 6 cm depth, or 4-5 cm in children until an AED is available or EMS assistance arrives
4. Fast use of the AED
A. Open and follow the instructions in the AED
B. Place the chest patches as indicated, remember to use pediatric patches in children less than 8 years-old. Do not touch the victim while the AED analyzes the rhythm
C. If a shock is required, the AED will indicate it
D. Remember to say «stand back» and assure that no one touches the victim before applying the shock
E. Push the blinking button to administer a shock
5. Re-start chest compressions until the patient regains consciousness, EMS assistance arrives or until the AED indicates it

SCA = Sudden Cardiac Arrest; CPR = Cardiopulmonar Resuscitation; AED = Automatic External Defibrillator; EMS = Emergency Medical System.

Public access AED

In large populations, the Hands-only CPR and early defibrillation (AED) training programs have shown to be effective because they encourage the community’s implication in early CPR and AED administration and reduce mortality rates.16 This is particularly evident among SCA victims with shockable rhythms in sports centers or units that have readily available AED’s and public CPR training.17 In order to protect more population, strategic places are chosen to locate public AED’s, and the devices are also included in different emergency vehicles so the SCA victims can be treated sooner.18 A local analysis showed that first responder units (police cars, for example) equipped with AED could lower the financial costs per life saved from 5.8 million pesos to 0.5 million pesos when compared with advanced life support ambulances. This is a way to optimize the resources and personnel use.19 Some countries have reported that by-stander CPR and AED use prior to the emergency medical services arrival has increased and that there is a higher community participation in resuscitation maneuvers, thus reducing mortality, increasing survival rates and improving the neurologic outcomes of the SCA victims. Those results emphasize the training programs meaningfulness and are a stimulus to continue training and promoting community based-CPR and AED use.13,20

Hands-only CPR and AED use Program in Mexico

Some Mexican States have already implemented «cardio-protected» areas with community hands-only CPR training and public access defibrillation, but the programs have not been implemented nation-wide yet. This is why it is important to promote the cardio-protected areas implementation in schools, large buildings, hotels, business centers, bus terminals, airports, malls, retirement facilities, residential clusters, sports centers, gyms, emergency medical units, medical offices units and so on. Any place with a potential to gather more than 500 people at a time, should ideally be a cardio-protected area. In this regard, it could also be useful to have every emergency services vehicle equipped with an AED. We believe that the best way to achieve cardio-protection in our country is to implement generalized Hands-only CPR training and to place AED’s in public places in a pattern similar to the present fire extinguisher placement legislation. This is a way to stimulate the public and private authorities participation, considering that they are the mainstay for the complete population’s protection. In Mexico we do not have comprehensive statistics on the incidence of SD. According to a preliminary study with a low number of interventions, in Querétaro, the one-year survival rate after implementation of CPR training for the public (while obtaining their driver’s license and through repeated training in public events) and police officers, and after equipping some police cars with AED, has raised from 0% to 6.4% in a ten year-period (Table 2).15,19 Nonetheless, it is important to establish a public health policy that ensures the continuity of the training efforts in order to maintain and increase the survival rate of these patients. A nation-wide permanent implementation of the hands-only CPR and public access defibrillation programs could promote several health improvements such as: 1) Increase the awareness and understanding of the general population and healthcare personal about this important problem, 2) Favor more preventive behaviors in the population in order to avoid a SCA, 3) Reduce the incidence of SCA and SD, and 4) Improve the survival rate of SCA victims in the community.

Table 2: Prehospital interventions and survival in the city of Querétaro of victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, registered with the Utstein-Style methodology.15,19  

* * 1 * *
2
2006 2009 2013 2017 2018 2019
n 147 204 79 62 68 68

CPR prior to EMS arrival (%)

2.0 10.8 44.4 NA NA NA
CPR by police (%) NA NA 1.5 24.5 18.4 24.2
Defibrillation by police (%) NA NA NA 2.0 0 1.6
Patients with shockable rhythms (%) NA 9.6 1.5 0 7.7 10.0
ROSC (%) 30.0 1.85 20.3 24.0 42.3 29.8
Survival (%) 0 0 2.5 6.45 4.4 1.47

* Change of the municipal goverment.

1. Medical Emergencies Regulator Center Start of operations (2011).

2. Querétero «Cardioprotected» City.

CPR = Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation; EMS = Emergency Medical Services; ROSC = Return Of Spontaneous Circulation; NA = non available.

Conclusions

SCA remains a main public health concern worldwide. Early Hands-only CPR and public access defibrillation performed by lay-persons might significantly increase the victim’s survival, especially among victims with a shockable rhythm. Nonetheless, those early interventions require large community based Hands-only CPR programs and enough AEDs available in public areas with certain features, mainly, any place that can gather 500 people or more at the same time. To achieve full coverage of the population, it is necessary the implementation of AEDs be a requirement as is the current normativity about the use of fire extinguisher in our country, which would allow the participation of all sectors (public and private), and we could achieve improvements in several important aspects of health in our population.

Acknowledgment

To our patients and coworkers.

References

1. Rodríguez-Reyes H, Muñoz M, Márquez MF, Pozas G, Asensio E, Ortiz F et al. Muerte súbita cardiaca. Estratificación de riesgo, prevención y tratamiento. Arch Cardiol Mex. 2015; 85 (4): 329-336. [ Links ]

2. Hayashi M, Shimizu W, Albert CM. The spectrum of epidemiology underlying sudden cardiac death. Circulation Res. 2015; 116: 1887-1906. [ Links ]

3. Kong H, Peterson E, Fonarow G, Sanders G, Yancy C, Russo A et al. Addressing disparities in sudden cardiac arrest care and the underutilization of effective therapies. Am Heart J. 2010; 160: 605-18.e1. [ Links ]

4. Hara M, Hayashi K, Hikoso S, Sakata Y, Kitamura T. Different impacts of time from collapse to first cardiopulmonary resuscitation on outcomes after witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in adults. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outomes. 2015; 8: 277-284. [ Links ]

5. Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, Cushman M, Das SR, Deo R et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2017 update. A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017; 135 (10): e146-e603. [ Links ]

6. Jayaraman R, Reinier K, Nair S, Aro AL, Uy-Evanado A, Rusinaru C et al. Risk Factors of sudden cardiac death in the young. multiple-year community-wide assessment. Circulation. 2018; 137: 1561-1570. [ Links ]

7. Kragholm K, Wissenberg M, Mortensen RN, Hansen SM, Hansen CM, Thorsteinsson K et al. Bystander effort and 1-year outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2017; 376: 1737-1747. [ Links ]

8. Narayan SM, Wang PJ, Daubert JP. New concepts in sudden cardiac arrest to address an intractable epidemic. JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 73: 70-88. [ Links ]

9. Hansen MB, Lippert FK, Rasmussen LS, Nielsen AM. Systemic downloading and analysis of data from automated external defibrillators used in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2014; 85: 1681-1685. [ Links ]

10. Olasveengen TM, de Caen AR, Mancini ME, Maconochie IK, Aickin R, Atkins DL et al. 2017 International consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations summary. Resuscitation. 2017; 121: 201-214. [ Links ]

11. Iwami TI, Kitamura T, Kawamura T, Mitamura H, Nagao K et al. Chest compression-only cardiopulmonar resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with public-access defibrillation. A nationwide cohort study. Circulation. 2012; 126: 2844-2851. [ Links ]

12. Iwami T, Kitamura T, Koyohara K, Kawamura T. Dissemination of chest compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation and survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation. 2015; 132: 415-422. [ Links ]

13. Blom MT, Beesems SG, Homma PC, Zijlstra JA, Hulleman M, van Hoeijen DA et al. Improved survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and use of automated external defibrillators. Circulation. 2014; 130: 1868-1875. [ Links ]

14. Fraga JM, Asensio E, Martínez R, Bárcenas I, Prieto J, Castillo L. Out of hospital cardiac arrest: first documented experience in a Mexican urban setting. Prehospital Disast Med. 2009; 24 (2): 121-125. [ Links ]

15. Fraga JM, Aguilera A, Barinagarrementería F, Ortiz C, Asensio E. Informe de 3 casos de reanimación extrahospitalaria en la ciudad de Querétaro. Importancia de un sistema integral de atención de urgencias médicas. Arch Cardiol Mex. 2014; 84 (2): 79-83. [ Links ]

16. Weisfeldt ML, Sitlani CM, Ornato J, Rea T, Aufderheide T, Davis D et al. Survival after application of automatic external defibrillators before arrival of the emergency medical system. evaluation in the resuscitation outcomes consortium population of 21 million. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 55: 1713-1720. [ Links ]

17. Page RL, Husain S, White L, Rea T, Fahrenbruch C, Yin L et al. Cardiac arrest at excercise facilities. implications for placement of automatic external defibrillators. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 62: 2102-2109. [ Links ]

18. Loma-Osorio P, Núñez M, Aboal J, Bosch D, Batlle P et al. Proyecto Girona Territori Cardioprotegit: evaluación del funcionamiento de los desfibriladores públicos. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2018; 71 (2): 79-85. [ Links ]

19. Aguilera A, Asensio E, Fraga JM. Análisis de la inclusión de la policía en la respuesta de emergencias al paro cardiorrespiratorio extrahospitalario. Salud Publica Mex. 2012; 54: 60-67. [ Links ]

20. Pollack RA, Brown SP, Rea T, Aufderheide T, Barbic D, Buick JE et al. Impact of bystander automated external defibrillator use on survival and functional outcomes in shockable observed public cardiac arrests. Circulation. 2018; 137: 2104-2113. [ Links ]

Received: December 19, 2019; Accepted: December 27, 2019

*Corresponding author: Dr. Humberto Rodríguez Reyes FACC, FHRS, AHA, LAHRS, ESC, SEC member. Coordinador del capítulo de PCS, MS y RCP del ANCAM 2019-2020. Presidente Sociedad Cardiovascular y Arritmias (SOCAyA). E-mail: humbertorodriguezr@hotmail.com

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License