SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.67 número3Note on the conformable boundary value problems: Sturm’s theorems and Green’s functionPrediction of rms charge radius of proton using proton-proton elastic scattering data at s = 2.76 TeV índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista mexicana de física

versión impresa ISSN 0035-001X

Rev. mex. fis. vol.67 no.3 México may./jun. 2021  Epub 21-Feb-2022

https://doi.org/10.31349/revmexfis.67.482 

Research

High Energy Physics

Approximate solutions of the Schrödinger equation with Hulthén-Hellmann potentials for a quarkonium system

I. O. Akpan1 

E. P. Inyang1 

E. P. Inyang1 

E. S. William1 

1Theoretical Physics Group, Department of Physics, University of Calabar, P.M.B 1115, Calabar, Nigeria. e-mail: etidophysics@gmail.com


Abstract

Hulthén plus Hellmann potentials are adopted as the quark-antiquark interaction potential for studying the mass spectra of heavy mesons. We solved the radial equation analytically using the Nikiforov-Uvarov method. The energy eigenvalues and corresponding wave function in terms of Laguerre polynomials were obtained. The present results are applied for calculating the mass of heavy mesons such as charmonium cc¯ and bottomonium bb¯. Four special cases were considered when some of the potential parameters were set to zero, resulting into Hellmann potential, Yukawa potential, Coulomb potential, and Hulthén potential, respectively. The present potential provides satisfying results in comparison with experimental data and the work of other researchers.

Keywords: Schrödinger equation; Nikiforov-Uvarov method; Hulthën potential; Hellmann potential; heavy mesons

1.Introduction

The study of the fundamental or constituent blocks of matter has been for long time a fascinating field in physics. In the nineteenth century, the atom was considered to be the fundamental particle, the one from which all matter was composed. This idea was used to explain the basic structure of all elements 1.

The problem of what were considered to be fundamental particles was resolved by the quarks. Because of the heavy masses of the constituent quarks, a good description of many features of these systems can be obtained using non-relativistic models where the quark-antiquark strong interaction is described by a phenomenological potential 2. Heavy quarkonium systems have turned out to provide extremely useful probes for the deconfined state of matter because the force between a heavy quark and anti-quark is weakened due to the presence of gluons which lead to the dissociation of quarkonium bound states 3. The quarkonia with heavy quark and antiquark and their interaction are well described by the equation (SE) 4. The solution of the spectral problem for the SE with spherically symmetric potentials is of major concern in describing the spectra of quarkonia 5. Potential models offer a rather good description of the mass spectra of systems such as a bottomonium, and charmonium 6. In simulating the interaction potentials for these systems, confining-type potentials are generally used. The holding potential is the so-called Cornell potential with two terms, one of which is responsible for the Coulomb interaction of the quarks and the other corresponds to a confining term 7.

The solutions to the SE can be established only if we know the confining potential for a particular physical system. Till now, there are only a few confining potentials, like the harmonic oscillator and the hydrogen atom, for which solutions to the SE are found exactly 8.

The Hulthén potential takes the form 9

V(r)=-A0e-αr1-e-αr, (1)

where α is the screening parameter and A0 is the potential strength which is sometimes identified with the atomic number when the potential is used for atomic phenomena (10). It is a short-range potential which is applied in many branches of physics, such as nuclear and particle physics, atomic physics, solid state physics, and chemical physics 11,12.

The Hellmann potential which is a superposition of an attraction Coulomb potential and a Yukawa potential can be expressed as 13.

V(r)=-A1r+A2e-αrr, (2)

where the parameters A1 and A2 denote the strength of Coulomb and Yukawa potentials respectively, α denotes the screening parameter, and r is the distance between two particles. These potentials have been used to study bound state problems by many researchers 14-20. Recently, Inyang et al. 21 obtained the Klein-Gordon equation solutions for the Yukawa potential using the Nikiforov-Uvarov (NU) method. The energy eigenvalues were obtained both in a relativistic and non-relativistic regime. They applied the results to calculate heavy-meson masses of charmonium cc¯ and bottomonium bc¯. Apart from that, many researchers have provided approximate solutions to SE using different methods with Cornell potential. For instance, Vega and Flores 22 obtained the approximate solutions of the Schrödinger equation with the Cornell potential using variational method and super symmetric quantum mechanics (SUSYQM). Abu-Shady et al. 23 studied the N-dimensional radial equation using the analytical exact iteration method (AEIM), in which the Cornell potential is generalized to finite temperature and chemical potential. In addition, Ciftci and Kisoglu 24, solved non-relativistic arbitrary l-states of quarkonium through asymptotic iteration method (AIM). An analytic solution of the N-dimensional radial equation with the mixture of vector and scalar potentials via the Laplace transformation method (LTM) were studied in . Al-Jamel and Widyan 26 studied heavy quarkonium mass spectra in a Coulomb field plus quadratic potential using NU method. Ibekwe et al. 27 solved the radial SE with an exponential, generalized, harmonic Cornell potential using the series expansion method. Their results were used to calculate the mass spectra of heavy-mesons. Al-Oun et al. 28 examine heavy quarkonia characteristics properties in the general framework of non-relativistic potential model consisting of a Coulomb plus quadratic potential. Chouikh et al. 29 proposed an approach to achieve quantum computation with atomics qubits in a cavity QED. Recently, researchers have shown great interest in the combination of two or more potentials in both the relativistic and non relativistic approach. The fundamental nature of combining two or more physical potential models is to have a wider range of application 30. For example, the Cornell potential which is the combination of the Coulomb potential with linear terms is used in studying the mass spectra for coupled states and for the electromagnetic characteristics of meson 31. For instance, William et al. 32 obtained bound state solutions of the radial equation by the combination of Hulthén and Hellmann potential within the framework of Nikiforov-Uvarov method. Also, Edet et al. 33 obtained an approximate solution of the SE for the modified Kratzer potential plus screened Coulomb potential model using the Nikiforov-Uvarov method. In this present work, we aim to study the SE with the combination of Hulthén and Hellmann potential analytically by using the NU method and apply the results to calculate the mass spectra of heavy quarkonium particles such as bottomonium and charmonium, in which the quarks are considered as spinless particles for easiness, which have not been considered before using this potentials to the best of our knowledge. The adopted potential is of the form 32

V(r)=-A0e-αr1-e-αr-A1r+A2e-αrr, (3)

where A0, A1, and A2 are potential strength parameters and α is the screening parameter. In other to make (3) temperature dependent, the screening parameter is replaced with the Debye mass m D(T), which is temperature-dependent and vanishes at T0 and we have,

V(r,T)=-A0e-mD(T)r1-e-mD(T)r-A1r+A2e-mD(T)rr. (4)

We carry out a series expansion of the exponential terms in (4) up to order three in order to model the potential to interact in the quark-antiquark system and this yields,

e-mD(T)rr=1r-mD(T)+mD2(T)r26+ (5)

e-mD(T)r1-e-mD(T)r=1mD(T)r-12+mD(T)r12+. (6)

We substitute (5) and (6) into (4) and obtain

V(r,T)=-β0r+β1r-β2r2+β3, (7)

where

-β0=A2-A1-A0mDT,  β1=A2mD2(T)r2-A0mDT12,  β2=A2mD3(T)6,   β3=A02-A2mD(T). (8)

The first term in (7) is the Coulomb potential that describes the short distance between quarks, while the second term is a linear term featuring confinement.

2.Approximate solutions of the equation with Hulthén plus Hellmann potential

The Schrödinger equation (SE) for two particles interacting via potential V(r) in three dimensional space, is given by 34

d2R(r)dr2+(2μ2(Enl-V(r))-l(l+1)r2)R(r)=0, (9)

where l, μ, r, and are the angular momentum quantum number, the reduced mass for the quarkonium particle, inter-particle distance and reduced plank constant respectively. We substitute (7) into (9) and obtain

d2R(r)dr2+[2μEnl2+2μβ02r-2μβ1r2+2μβ2r22-2μβ32-l(l+1)r2]R(r)=0. (10)

Let,

ζ=2μ2Enl-β3,α0=2μβ02, α1=2μβ12,α2=2μβ22,γ=l(l+1). (11)

Substituting (11) into (10), we have

d2R(r)dr2+(ζ+α0r-α1r+α2r2-γr2)R(r)=0. (12)

Transforming the coordinate of (12) we set

x=1r. (13)

Differentiating (13) and simplifying we have

d2Rdr2+2r3dRdx+1r4d2Rdx2. (14)

Substituting (13) and (14) into (12) we have

d2R(x)dx2+2xdRdx+1x4[ζ+α0x+α1x+α2x2-γx2]R(x)=0. (15)

Next, we propose the following approximation scheme on the term α1/x and α2/x2.

Let us assume that there is a characteristic radius r0 of the meson. Then the scheme is based on the expansion of α1/x and α2/x2 in a power series around r0, i.e. around δ1/r0, in the x-space up to the second order. This is similar to the Pekeris approximation, which helps to deform the centrifugal term such that the modified potential can be solved by the NU method 35.

Setting y=x-δ and around y=0, it can be expanded into a series of powers as;

α1x=α1y+δ=α1δ1+yδ=α1δ1+yδ-1, (16)

which yields

α1x=α13δ-3xδ2+x2δ3. (17)

Similarly,

α2x2=α26δ2-8xδ3+3x2δ4. (18)

By substituting (18) and (17) into (15) , we obtain

d2R(x)dx2+2xx2dR(x)dx+1x4[-ε+αx-βx2]R(x)=0, (19)

where

-ε=ζ+6α2δ2-3α1δ   α=3α1δ2+α0-8α2δ3    β=γ+α1δ3-3α2δ4. (20)

Comparing Eq. (19) and Eq.(A1) we obtain

τ~(x)=2x,σx=x2 σ~(x)=-ε+αx-βx2   σ'=2x,σ(x)=2. (21)

We substitute (21) into (A9) and obtain

π(x)=±ε-αx+(β+k)x2. (22)

To determine k, we take the discriminant of the function under the square root, which yields

k=α2-4βε4ε. (23)

We substitute (23) into (22) and have

π(x)=±αx2ε-εε. (24)

For a physically acceptable solution, we take the negative part of (24) which is required for bound state problems and differentiate; this yields

π'(x)=-α2ε. (25)

Substituting (21) and (25) into (A7) we have

τ(x)=2x-αxε+2εε. (26)

Differentiating (26) we have

τ'(x)=2-αε. (27)

By using (A10), we obtain

λ=α2-4βε4ε-α2ε, (28)

and using (A11), we obtain

λn=nαε-n2-n. (29)

Equating Eqs. (28) and (29), the energy eigenvalues of (10) are given

Enl=A012-mD(T)4δ+A2mD(T)3mD(T)2δ-mD2(T)-1,

-28μ2μ2A2-A1+A0mD(T)+μmD(T)δ2δ23A2mD(T)-A02-8μA2mD3(T)32δ3n+12+l+122+μA2mD2(T)2δ31-mD(T)δ-μA0mD(T)62δ3. (30)

2.1.Special cases

In this subsection, we obtain the special case by setting some parameters to zero.

1. When we set A0=A1=0, we obtain the energy eigenvalues for Yukawa potential

Enl=A2mD(T)3mD(T)2δ-mD2(T)-1-28μ-2μA22+3μA2mD2(T)2δ2-8μA2mD3(T)32δ3n+12l+12+2+μA2mD2(T)2δ31-mD(T)δ2. (31)

2. When we set A1=A-2=0 , we obtain the energy eigenvalue for Hulthén potential

Enl=A012-mD(T)4δ-28μ2μA02mD(T)-A0μmD(T)22δ2n+12+l+122-μA0mD2(T)62δ32. (32)

3. When we set A0, we obtain the energy eigenvalue for Hellmann potential

Enl=A2mD(T)3mD(T)2δ-mD2(T)-1-28μ2μ2(A1-A2)+3A2μmD2(T)2δ2-8μA2mD3(T)32δ3n+12+l+122+μA2mD2(T)2δ31-mD(T)δ2. (33)

4. When we set A0=A2=mD(T)=0, we obtain the energy eigenvalues for Coulomb potential

Enl=μA1222(n+l+1)2. (34)

The result of (34) is very consistent with the result obtained in (36) of .

To determine the wavefunction, we substitute (21) and (24) into (A4) and obtain

dϕϕ=εx2ε-α2xεdx. (25)

Integrating Eq. (35), we obtain

ϕ(x)=x-(α/2ε)e(ε/xε). (36)

By substituting (21) and (24) into (A6) and integrating, we obtain

ρ(x)=x-(α/ε)e-(2ε/xε). (37)

Substituting (21) and (37) into (A5) we have

yn(x)=Bne(2ε/xε)x(α/ε)×dndxne(2ε/xx)x(2n-[α/ε]). (38)

The Rodrigues’ formula of the associated Laguerre polynomials is

Ln(α/ε)2εxε=1n!e(2ε/xε)xα/ε×dndxne-(2ε/xx)x(2n-[α/ε]). (39)

where

1n!=Bn. (40)

Hence,

yn(x)Ln(α/ε)2εxε. (41)

Substituting (36) and (41) into (A2) we obtain the wave function of (10) in terms of Laguerre polynomial as

ψ(x)=Bnlx-(α/2εe-(ε/xε)Ln(α/ε)2εxε, (42)

where Nnl is normalization constant, which can be obtained from

0|Bnl(r)|2dr=1. (43)

3.Results

We calculate the mass spectra of the heavy quarkonium system such as charmonium and bottomonium that have the quark and antiquark flavor, and apply the following relation 36,37

M=2m+Enl, (44)

where m is quarkonium bare mass and Enl is energy eigenvalues. By substituting (30) into (44) we obtain the mass spectra for Hulthén plus Hellmann potential as

M=2m+A012-mD(T)4δ+A2mD(T)3mD(T)2δ-mD2(T)-1-28μ2μ2A2-A1+A0mD(T)+μmD(T)δ23A2mD(T)-A02-8μA2mD3(T)32δ3n+12+l+122+μA2mD2(T)2δ31-mD(T)δ-μA0mD(T)62δ32. (45)

3.1.Discussion of results

We calculate the mass spectra of charmonium and bottomonium for states from 1S to 1F, by using Eq. (45). The free parameters of Eq. (45) are fitted with experimental data by solving two algebraic equations. Experimental data are obtained from 38,39. For bottomonium bb¯ and charmonium cc¯ systems we adopt the numerical values of these masses as mb = 4.823 and mc = 1.209 respectively 40. Then, the corresponding reduced mass are μb=2.4115 and μc=0.6045. The Debye mass mD(T) is taken as 1.52 GeV by fitting with experimental data. We note that calculation of mass spectra of charmonium and bottomonium are in a good agreement with experimental data as well as the work of other researches as presented in Tables I and II. It is important to note that the values obtained are improved in comparison with works like that of Ref. 35, as shown in Tables I and II in which the author investigated the N- radial SE analytically when the Cornell potential was extended to finite temperature.

Table I Mass spectra of charmoniumin (GeV) for Hulthén plus Hellmann potential, (m c = 1:209 GeV, μ = 0:6045 GeV, A0 = -1:693 GeV, A1 = 20:654 GeV, A2 = 0:018 GeV, δ = 0:2 GeV, m D (T) = 1:52 GeV, ℏ = 1). 

State Present work [35] [24] Experiment [38,39]
1S 3.096 3.096 3.096 3.096
2S 3.686 3.686 3.672 3.686
1P 3.521 3.255 3.521 3.525
2P 3.772 3.779 3.951 3.773
3S 4.040 4.040 4.085 4.040
4S 4.262 4.269 4.433 4.263
1D 3.768 3.504 3.800 3.770
2D 4.146 - - 4.159
1F 3.962 - - -

Table II Mass spectra of bottomonium in (GeV) for Hulthén plus Hellmann potential, (mb = 4:823 GeV, μ = 2:4115 GeV, A0 = -1:591 GeV, A1 = 9:649 GeV, A2 = 0:028 GeV, δ = 0:25 GeV, m D (T) = 1:52 GeV, ℏ = 1). 

State Present work [35] [24] Experiment [38,39]
1S 9.460 9.460 9.462 9.460
2S 10.023 10.023 10.027 10.023
1P 9.861 9.619 9.9630 9.899
2P 10.238 10.114 10.299 10.260
3S 10.355 10.355 10.361 10.355
4S 10.579 10.567 10.624 10.580
1D 10.143 9.864 10.209 10.164
2D 10.306 - - -
1F 10.209 - - -

We also plotted the mass spectra energy as a function of potential parameters and Debye mass. In Figs. 1 and 2, the mass spectra energies increases to a peak and later decreases as potential parameters and increases, respectively. In Fig. 3 the mass spectra converges at the beginning, but spreads out and decrease monotonically with the increase in potential parameter A2. Figure 4 show the increase in mass spectra as the Debye mass increases, for various angular quantum numbers.

Figure 1 Mass spectra variation with potential parameter A0 for different quantum numbers. 

Figure 2 Mass spectra variation with potential parameter A1 for different quantum numbers 

Figure 3 Mass spectra variation with potential parameter A2 for different quantum numbers. 

Figure 4 Mass spectra variation with the Debye mass m D (T) for different quantum numbers. 

4.Conclusion

In this study, we adopted Hulthén plus Hellmann potential models for quark-antiquark interaction. The potential was made to be temperature dependent by replacing the screening parameter with Debye mass which vanishes at. The Schrödinger equation is analytically solved using the Nikiforov-Uvarov method. We obtained approximate solutions of the eigenvalues and eigenfunction in terms of Laguerre polynomials. We applied the present results to calculate heavy-meson masses such as charmonium cc¯, and bottomonium bb¯ for states 1S to 1F which are in good agreement with experimental data and the work of others. Four special cases were considered when some of the potential parameters were set to zero, resulting into Hellmann potential, Yukawa potential, Coulomb potential, and Hulthén potential, respectively. Different plots of mass spectra versus different potential parameters and Debye mass were analyzed and discussed.

References

1. H. Mutuk, Mass Spectra and Decay constants of Heavy-Light Mesons: A Case Study of QCD Sum Rules and Quark Model, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2018 (2018) 8095653, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8095653. [ Links ]

2. Á. Mócsy, Potential models for quarkonia, Eur. Phys. J. C 61 (2009) 705, https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-008-0847-4. [ Links ]

3. A. K. Rai and D. P. Rathaud, The mass spectra and decay properties of dimesonic states, using the Hellmann potential, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 462, https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3695-z. [ Links ]

4. A. N. Ikot et al.,, Superstatistics of Schrödinger equation with pseudo-harmonic potential in external magnetic and Aharanov-Bohm fields, Heliyon 6 (2020) e03738, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03738. [ Links ]

5. S. M. Ikhdair, Relativistic Bound States of Spinless Particle by the Cornell Potential Model in External Fields, Adv. High EnergyPhys. 2013 (2013) 491648, https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/491648. [ Links ]

6. M.-C. Anisiu, Yukawa: The Man and the Potential, Did. Math.33 (2015) 1. [ Links ]

7. E. Omugbe, O. E. Osafile, and M. C. Onyeaju, Mass Spectrum of Mesons via the WKB Approximation Method, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2020 (2020) 5901464, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5901464. [ Links ]

8. H. Mansour and A. Gamal, Bound State of Heavy Quarks Using a General Polynomial Potential, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2018 (2018) 7269657, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7269657. [ Links ]

9. L. Hulthén, Über die Eigenlösungen der Schrödinger-Gleichung des Deuterons, Ark. Mat. Astron. Fys. A 28 (1942) 5. [ Links ]

10. T. Xu, Z.-Q. Cao, Y.-C. Ou, Q.-S. Shen, and G.-L. Zhu, Critical radius and dipole polarizability for a confined system, Chin. Phys. 15 (2006) 1172, https://doi.org/10.1088/1009-1963/15/6/008. [ Links ]

11. B. Durand and L. Durand, Duality for heavy-quark systems, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 1092, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.23.1092. [ Links ]

12. C.-S. Jia, J.-Y. Wang, S. He, and L.-T. Sun, Shape invariance and the supersymmetry WKB approximation for a diatomic molecule potential, J. Phys. A 33 (2000) 6993, https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/33/39/313. [ Links ]

13. H. Hellmann, A New Approximation Method in the Problem of Many Electrons, J. Chem. Phys. 3 (1935) 61, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1749559. [ Links ]

14. B. J. Falaye, K. J. Oyewumi, T. T. Ibrahim, M. A. Punyasena, and C. A. Onate, Bound state solutions of the Manning-Rosen potential, Can. J. Phys. 91 (2013) 98, https://doi.org/10.1139/cjp-2012-0330. [ Links ]

15. C. A. Onate, O. Ebomwonyi, K. O. Dopamu, J. O. Okoro, and M. O. Oluwayemi, Eigen solutions of the Ddimensional Schrödinger equation with inverse trigonometry scarf potential and Coulomb potential, Chin. J. Phys. 56 (2018) 2538, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjph.2018.03.013. [ Links ]

16. J. A. Obu, E. S. William, I. O. Akpan, E. A. Thompson, and E. P. Inyang, Analytical Investigation of the Single-Particle Energy Spectrum in Magic Nuclei of 56Ni and 116Sn, Eur. J. Appl. Phys. 2 (2020) 28, https://doi.org/10.24018/ejphysics.2020.2.6.28. [ Links ]

17. S. M. Ikhdair, An improved approximation scheme for the centrifugal term and the Hulthc n potential, Eur. Phys. J. A 39 (2009) 307, https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2008-10715-2. [ Links ]

18. E. P. Inyang, E. S.William, and J. A. Obu, Eigensolutions of the N-dimensional Schrödinger equation interacting with Varshni-Hulthc n potential model, Rev. Mex. Fis. 67 (2021) 193,https://doi.org/10.31349/RevMexFis.67.193. [ Links ]

19. J. E. Ntibi, E. P. Inyang, E. P. Inyang, and E. S. William, Relativistic treatment of Ddimensional Klein-Gordon equation with Yukawa potential, Int. J. Innov. Sci. Eng. Technol. 7 (2020) 28. [ Links ]

20. M. Hamzavi, K. E. Thylwe, and A. A. Rajabi, Approximate Bound States Solution of the Hellmann Potential, Commun. Theor. Phys. 60 (2013) 1, https://doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/60/1/01. [ Links ]

21. E. P. Inyang, E. P. Inyang, J. E. Ntibi, E. E. Ibekwe, and E.S. William, Approximate solutions of D-dimensional Klein-Gordon equation with Yukawa potential via Nikiforov- Uvarov method, Indian J. Phys. (to be published), https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-020-01933-x. [ Links ]

22. A. Vega and J. Flores, Heavy quarkonium properties from Cornell potential using variational method and supersymmetric quantum mechanics, Pramana 87 (2016) 73, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-016-1278-7. [ Links ]

23. M. Abu-Shady, T. A. Abdel-Karim, and Sh. Y. Ezz-Alarab, Masses and thermodynamic properties of heavy mesons in the non-relativistic quark model using the Nikiforov Uvarov method, J. Egypt. Math. Soc. 27 (2019) 14, https://doi.org/10.1186/s42787-019-0014-0. [ Links ]

24. H. Ciftci and H. F. Kisoglu, Nonrelativistic Arbitrary l-States of Quarkonium through Asymptotic Iteration Method, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2018 (2018) 4549705, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4549705. [ Links ]

25. M. Abu-Shady, Analytic Solution of Dirac Equation for Extended Cornell Potential Using the Nikiforov-Uvarov Method, Boson J. Mod. Phys. 1 (2015) 16. [ Links ]

26. A. Al-Jamel and H. Widyan, Heavy Quarkonium Mass Spectra in A Coulomb Field Plus Quadratic Potential Using Nikiforov-Uvarov Method, Appl. Phys. Res. 4 (2012) 94, https://doi.org/10.5539/apr.v4n3p94. [ Links ]

27. E. E. Ibekwe, A. T. Ngiangia, U. S. Okorie, A. N. Ikot, and H. Y. Abdullah, Bound State Solution of Radial Schrödinger Equation for the Quark-Antiquark Interaction Potential, Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Sci. 44 (2020) 1191, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40995-020-00913-4. [ Links ]

28. A. Al-Oun, A. Al-Jamel, and H. Widyan, Various Properties of Heavy Quarkonia from Flavor-Independent Coulomb Plus Quadratic Potential, Jordan J. Phys. 8 (2015) 199. [ Links ]

29. A. Chouikh, T. Said, and M. Bennai, Alternative Approach for Quantum Comptutation in a Cavity QED, Quantum Phys. Lett. 6 (2017) 65, https://doi.org/10.18576/qpl/060109. [ Links ]

30. R. Kumar and F. Chand, Solutions to the N-dimensional radial Schrödinger equation for the potential ar2 + br ¡ c=r, Pramana 83 (2014) 39, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-014-0759-9. [ Links ]

31. C. A. Onate, J. O. Ojonubah, A. Adeoti, E. J. Eweh, and M. Ugboja, Approximate Eigen Solutions of D.K.P. and Klein-Gordon Equations with Hellmann Potential, Afr. Rev. Phys. 9 (2014) 497. [ Links ]

32. E. S. William, E. P. Inyang, and E. A. Thompson, Arbitrary l- solutions of the Schrödinger equation interacting with Hulthén-Hellmann potential model, Rev. Mex. Fis. 66 (2020) 730, https://doi.org/10.31349/RevMexFis.66.730. [ Links ]

33. C. O. Edet, U. S. Okorie, A. T. Ngiangia, and A. N. Ikot, Bound state solutions of the Schrödinger equation for the modified Kratzer potential plus screened Coulomb potential, Indian J. Phys. 94 (2020) 425, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-019-01477-9. [ Links ]

34. E. P. Inyang, J. E. Ntibi, E. P. Inyang, E. S. William, and C. C. Ekechukwu, Any l- state solutions of the Schrödinger equation interacting with class of Yukawa-Eckart potentials, Int. J. Innov. Sci. Eng. Technol. 7 (2020) 42. [ Links ]

35. M. Abu-Shady, N-dimensional Schrödinger equation at finite temperature using the Nikiforov-Uvarov method, J. Egypt. Math. Soc. 25 (2017) 86, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joems.2016.06.006. [ Links ]

36. E. P. Inyang, E. P. Inyang, E. S. William, E. E. Ibekwe, and I. O. Akpan, Analytical Investigation of Meson Spectrum via Exact Quantization Rule Approach, arXiv:2012.10639. [ Links ]

37. E. P. Inyang, E. P. Inyang, I. O. Akpan, J. E. Ntibi, and E. S. William, Analytical Solutions of the Schrödinger Equation with Class of Yukawa Potential for a Quarkonium System Via Series Expansion Method, Eur. J. Appl. Phys. 2 (2020) 26, https://doi.org/10.24018/ejphysics.2020.2.6.26. [ Links ]

38. M. Tanabashi et al., (Particle Data Group), Review of Particle Physics, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 030001, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.030001. [ Links ]

39. K. Olive et al., (Particle Data Group), Review of Particle Physics, Chin. Phys. C 38 (2014) 090001, https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/38/9/090001. [ Links ]

40. (are the authors referring to J. Beringer et al., (Particle Data Group), Review of Particle Physics, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 010001 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.86.010001. ?) [ Links ]

41. A. F. Nikiforov and V. B. Uvarov, Special Functions of Mathematical Physics (Birkhäuser, Bassel, 1988), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1595-8. [ Links ]

42. C. M. Ekpo et al.,, New Generalized Morse-Like Potential for Studying the Atomic Interaction in Diatomic Molecules, arXiv:2012.02581. [ Links ]

43. E. P. Inyang, E. P. Inyang, J. E. Ntibi, E. E. Ibekwe, and E. S. William, Analytical study on the Applicability of Ultra Generalized Exponential Hyperbolic Potential to Predict the Mass Spectra of the Heavy Mesons, arXiv:2101.06389. [ Links ]

Appendix

A. Review of Nikiforov-Uvarov (NU) method

The NU method was proposed by Nikiforov and Uvarov 41-43 to transform Schrödinger-like equations into a second-order differential equation via a coordinate transformation x = x(r), of the form

ψ(x)+τ~(x)σ(x)ψ'(s)+σ~(x)σ2(x)ψ(x)=0, (A.1)

where σ̃(x), and σ(x) are polynomials, at most second degree and τ̃(x) is a first-degree polynomial. The exact solution of Eq. (A1) can be obtained by using the transformation.

ψ(x)=ϕ(x)y(x). (A.2)

This transformation reduces Eq. (A1) into a hypergeometric-type equation of the form

σ(x)y(x)+τ(x)y'(x)+λy(x)=0. (A.3)

The function ϕ(x) can be defined as the logarithm derivative

ϕ'(x)ϕ(x)=π(x)σ(x). (A.4)

With π(x) being at most a first-degree polynomial. The second part of ψ(x) being y(x) in Eq. (A2) is the hypergeometric function with its polynomial solution given by Rodrigues relation as

y(x)=Bnlρ(x)dndxn[σn(x)ρ(x)], (A.5)

where Bnl is the normalization constant and ρ(x) the weight function which satisfies the condition below;

(σ(x)ρ(x))'=τ(x)ρ(x), (A.6)

where also

τ(x)=τ̃(x)+2π(x). (A.7)

For bound solutions, it is required that

τ'(x)<0. (A.8)

The eigenfunctions and eigenvalues can be obtained using the definition of the following function π(x) and parameter λ, respectively:

π(x)=σ'(x)-τ~(x)2±σ'(x)-τ~(x)2-σ~(x)+kσ(x) (A.9)

and

λ=k-+π'-(x). (A.10)

The value of k can be obtained by setting the discriminant in the square root in (A9) equal to zero. As such, the new eigenvalues equation can be given as

λ+nτ'(x)+n(n-12σ(x)=0,\na(n=0,1,2,....). (A.11)

Received: November 26, 2020; Accepted: December 30, 2020

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons