SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.43 número1Coledocolitiasis primaria en situs inversus totalProcedimiento de Puestow: resultados en 19 años de experiencia institucional índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Cirujano general

versión impresa ISSN 1405-0099

Cir. gen vol.43 no.1 Ciudad de México ene./mar. 2021  Epub 15-Ago-2022

https://doi.org/10.35366/103908 

Original articles

Management of gallbladder edema confused as cholecystitis in the Emergency Department

Manejo del edema de vesícula biliar confundido como colecistitis, en el departamento de urgencias

Jair Díaz Martínez1  * 

1 Departamento de Cirugía Hepatopancreatobiliar. IMSS Hospital General Regional No. 1 Cuernavaca, Mor., México. ORCID: 0000-0002-7581-6739.


Abstract:

Introduction:

Different acute systemic diseases (heart failure, cirrhosis, hepatitis) can produce gallbladder edema and be confused with acute cholecystitis. This study’s objective is to analyze the patients presented to cholecystectomy due to gallbladder wall thickening confused as cholecystitis in the Emergency Department.

Material and methods:

An observational retrospective study in a Regional Reference Center was conducted from December 2016 to November 2019. Patients admitted to the emergency department for possible acute cholecystitis were reviewed.

Results:

Of 3,393 patients analyzed with suspected cholecystitis, 31 patients were confused with acute cholecystitis for gallbladder wall thickening secondary to diverse acute diseases, and presented for cholecystectomy. The majority were male (51%). In all patients, the gallbladder wall thickening due to edema more than 5 mm without signs of cholecystitis was corroborated, (mean: 8.96 mm, range: 5-16 mm). The admission diagnoses that were confused as cholecystitis were liver diseases, dengue, cardiovascular diseases, pneumonia, and pancreatitis. In seven patients (22.6%), cholecystectomy for suspected cholecystitis was performed. Two patients presented post-surgical complications (6.5%), and none died. In the histopathological study, no signs of calculous cholecystitis were found. In the analysis, the operated patients had a hospital stay larger than patients no operated, showing statistical significance (p = 0.004).

Conclusion:

In the emergency treatment of patients with suspect cholecystitis, it is mandatory ruled out gallbladder edema secondary to acute diseases. Surgical treatment in patients confused as acute cholecystitis can increase the length of hospital stay.

Keywords: Gallbladder; confused; cholecystitis; cholecystectomy; misdiagnosed

Resumen:

Introducción:

Diferentes enfermedades sistémicas agudas (enfermedades cardiacas, cirrosis, hepatitis) pueden producir edema de pared de vesícula biliar y ser confundidas con colecistitis aguda. El objetivo de este estudio es analizar los pacientes presentados para colecistectomía, por engrosamiento de pared de vesícula biliar confundidos como colecistitis aguda en el departamento de urgencias.

Material y métodos:

Se realizó un estudio observacional, retrospectivo de diciembre 2016 a noviembre 2019 en un centro regional de referencia. Se revisaron pacientes admitidos al servicio de urgencias por posible colecistitis aguda.

Resultados:

De 3,393 pacientes sospechosos de colecistitis, 31 fueron confundidos con colecistitis aguda por presentar engrosamiento de la pared vesicular secundario a enfermedades agudas diversas, y presentados para colecistectomía. La mayoría fueron varones (51%). En todos los pacientes, el engrosamiento de pared de vesícula biliar de más de 5 mm sin signos de colecistitis aguda fue corroborado (media: 8.96 mm, rango: 5-16 mm). Los diagnósticos que se confundieron con colecistitis fueron enfermedades hepáticas, dengue, enfermedades cardiovasculares, neumonía y pancreatitis. En siete pacientes (22.6%) se realizó colecistectomía por sospecha de colecistitis. Dos pacientes presentaron complicaciones postquirúrgicas (6.5%) y ninguno falleció. En el estudio histopatológico no se encontraron signos de colecistitis biliar. En el análisis, los pacientes que recibieron tratamiento quirúrgico tuvieron una estancia hospitalaria mayor que los no operados mostrando significancia estadística (p = 0.004).

Conclusión:

En el tratamiento de urgencia en pacientes con sospecha de colecistitis es obligatorio descartar edema de vesícula biliar secundario a enfermedades sistémicas. El tratamiento quirúrgico en pacientes confundidos con colecistitis aguda puede incrementar la estancia hospitalaria.

Palabras clave: Vesícula biliar; confusión; colecistitis; colecistectomía; confusión diagnóstica

Introduction

Acute cholecystitis is common in the emergency department, and the diagnosis is based on clinical signs and radiological findings.1-3 However, different acute systemic diseases (heart failure, cirrhosis, hepatitis) can produce symptoms and even alterations in complementary diagnostic studies such as gallbladder wall thickening that resemble cholecystitis.4,5 In acute systemic diseases, surgical treatment can produce a higher systemic inflammatory response, increasing morbidity and mortality.6-8 Despite this, many of these pathologies are still confused with cholecystitis and continue to be presented to the surgery department for emergency cholecystectomy, representing a challenge for the surgeon.7 Despite this, few articles explain this entity, persisting the gallbladder edema misdiagnosed as cholecystitis.

The objective of this study is to identify and analyze the patients presented for cholecystectomy with gallbladder edema secondary to acute diseases, confused as cholecystitis in the emergency department of a Regional Reference Center.

Material and Methods

Study design: a retrospective study in a Regional Reference Center was conducted from December 2016 to November 2019. Patients admitted to the emergency department due to suspected acute cholecystitis were analyzed. All patients underwent radiological studies (abdominal ultrasound and CT-scan) and acute cholecystitis was ruled out. Inclusion criteria were patients older than 18 years, with signs, symptoms (colic pain in the right hypochondrium, nausea, vomiting), and radiological findings similar to cholecystitis but without cholecystitis. Patients with radiological findings compatible with lithiasic cholecystitis according to Tokyo 2018 guidelines criteria, like micro lithiasis, anatomical gallbladder alterations (polyps, scleroatrophic, in a Phrygian cap, etc.) or increased gallbladder diameters were excluded.9

Clinical evaluation: the patient’s files with surgical assessment for suspected cholecystitis were retrospectively reviewed. In all patients, comorbidities, medical history, clinical symptoms, laboratories were evaluated, as well as radiographic signs in the abdominal ultrasound or in the abdominal tomography. Surgical indication for suspected cholecystitis, histopathological findings after surgery, the primary cause of gallbladder edema, hospital stay, follow-up, morbidity, and mortality were evaluated.

Statistical analysis: We use descriptive statistics, as well t-student, for continuous variables, χ2, and non-parametric proofs for categorical variables to perform the analysis. A p-value ≤ 0.05 (confidence interval of 95%) was considered statistically significant. The statistical analysis was performed using the program IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, Statistics version 24.0, Inc, Chicago, IL).

Results

Of 3,393 patients analyzed, 31 patients were presented for cholecystectomy with gallbladder edema confused as cholecystitis, representing 0.91% of the total population. The average age was 43.94 years (range, 18-81), most of them being males (51%, n = 16). Ten patients (32.3%) presented comorbidities, the majority due to diabetes and systemic arterial hypertension. Of these, two patients (6.5%) with type II diabetes, four with type II diabetes, and systemic arterial hypertension (12.9%), one with cerebral vascular disease and arterial hypertension (3.2%), and one patient with antiphospholipid syndrome (3.2%). The rest 21 patients (67.7%) without comorbidities. The characteristics of our population are shown in Table 1.

Table 1: Characteristics of our population (N = 31). 

Variable n (%)
Age (years)* 43.94 ± 18.28
Gender (male) 16 (51.6)
Comorbidities
DM 2 (6.5)
DM, AH 4 (12.9)
AH, CVA 1 (3.2)
APS 1 (3.2)
Operated patients 7 (22.5)

* Mean ± standard deviation.

DM = diabetes mellitus; AH = arterial hypertension; CVA = cerebrovascular accident; APS = antiphospholipid syndrome.

Upon admission, all patients underwent imaging studies for suspected acute cholecystitis (abdominal ultrasonography and or abdominal tomography). In all patients, the gallbladder wall thickening of more than 5 mm (mean: 8.96 mm, range: 5-16 mm) was corroborated, and signs of acute cholecystitis (criteria TG-18) or structural alterations were ruled out. Differences between acute cholecystitis and gallbladder edema in the abdominal ultrasound are shown in Figure 1, and differences in the CT scan are shown in Figure 2, respectively.

Figure 1: Abdominal ultrasound shows differences between acute cholecystitis and gallbladder wall thickening without cholecystitis. A) Wall thickening of the gallbladder due to acute cholecystitis with multiple lithiasis. B) Simple gallbladder edema due to dengue without cholecystitis. 

Figure 2: Tomographic differences between typical cholecystitis and simple gallbladder wall thickening. A) Typical cholecystitis gallbladder wall thickening. B) Gallbladder edema in a patient with viral disease without cholecystitis. 

The admission diagnoses of these patients were mostly liver diseases (55%, n = 17). Ten patients presented with acute viral hepatitis corroborated by elevated transaminase levels and hepatic viral profile. Five patients presented with decompensated cirrhosis, Child-Pugh B, one patient with non-alcoholic liver disease, and one patient with a left lobe liver tumor who subsequently found a diagnosis of left lobe hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Ten patients (32.25%) presented hemorrhagic dengue with abdominal involvement corroborated later in their hospitalization for IgM and IgG antibodies. Two patients presented for cardiovascular diseases, confirming an acute myocardial infarction. One patient presented with fungal pneumonia and one patient with severe acute non-biliary pancreatitis Balthazar D.

After surgical assessment in these 31 cases, in seven patients emergency surgical treatment was performed (22.58%). These patients underwent emergency cholecystectomy for suspected acute cholecystitis. Of these, four patients underwent open cholecystectomy, and three patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and one of these patients, also a liver biopsy, was performed due to elevated transaminase in the presence of negative viral panel. In operated patients, the primary diagnosis that produced the gallbladder edema was viral hepatitis in four patients (12.9%), cirrhosis Child-Pugh A in one patient (3.2%), non-alcoholic liver disease in one patient (3.2%), and non-biliary pancreatitis (3.2%) in one patient. In Table 2, we show a definitive diagnosis of our patients who underwent cholecystectomy.

Table 2: Definitive diagnosis of our patients underwent cholecystectomy. 

Diagnosis Surgery, n (%)
Viral hepatitis 4 (12.9)
Cirrhosis 1 (3.2)
Non-alcoholic liver disease 1 (3.2)
Hepatocellular carcinoma 0
Hemorrhagic dengue 0
Acute myocardial infarction 0
Pneumonia 0
Non-biliary pancreatitis 1 (3.2)
Total 7 (22.5)

After surgery, two patients presented complications (6.5%), and none died. Complications were hemoperitoneum and abortion secondary due to transuterine bleeding. The patient with hemoperitoneum was secondary to open cholecystectomy, with 1,500 cc of hepatic bleeding. In this patient reoperation for hemostatic control was needed. Clinical evolution after reoperation was satisfactory, and the patient was discharged without any other complication. The other patient presented transuterine bleeding with the subsequent abortion of 9 weeks gestation. This patient was managed by the gynecology service for hemostatic control and subsequently discharged without other complication. In the histopathological study, no signs of cholesterolosis, or lithiasic inflammation secondary to gallstones were founded. During the hospital follow-up, two patients without surgical treatment died (6.5%). One patient was secondary to acute transmural myocardial infarction and the other patient due to multiorgan failure after massive hemorrhagic dengue with antiphospholipid syndrome.

In the rest of the patient’s misdiagnosis as cholecystitis, presented for cholecystectomy, the gallbladder edema was revalued, and no indication for surgical treatment was found. Subsequently, the patients evolved satisfactorily and were discharged. The average hospital stay was 9.38 days (range, 3-21 days). In patients, without surgical treatment, the hospital stay was 8.7 days (range: 3-12 days), and with surgical treatment was 17 days (range: 14-21 days). The causes of gallbladder edema misdiagnosed as cholecystitis were analyzed with the different diagnosis and pre-surgical variables, and no significance was found. Besides, post-surgical complications were analyzed with the pre-surgical diagnosis without finding significance. In operated patients, the analyst of hospital stay was significantly larger than patients without surgery, finding statistical significance (p = 0.004). No complications after 30 days of follow-up were found.

Discussion

Different systemic diseases can produce gallbladder wall thickening due to edema demonstrated by ultrasound or tomography, and this could be confused with acute cholecystitis. Some of these diseases are self-limited such as hepatitis A or dengue, but other diseases become fatal, and recognizing them on time can improve the prognosis of these patients.6,7,10,11 The presentation of these diseases is sometimes not so clear, and experience is required to rule out surgical treatment. In addition to all this, there is a lack of evidence worldwide, especially in Latin America, where this diagnostic confusion has been less reported, making recognition of this situation more difficult.

Lithiasic cholecystitis is a prevalent disease reported in up to 10% of the population. Unlike lithiasic cholecystitis, gallbladder edema without lithiasis is a rare condition. In our series, the frequency of gallbladder wall thickening without cholecystitis was only 0.95% of all patients presented for cholecystectomy. Due to this low frequency of presenting wall thickening in patients with typical symptoms, many surgical teams prefer to perform cholecystectomy due to the risk of not detected silent lithiasis, with its subsequent complications.12-14

Unlike the mechanism in lithiasic cholecystitis where the luminal obstruction of the cystic duct produced mucous distention, ulceration, and infiltration of leukocytes, in patients with non-lithiasic gallbladder edema the mechanism occurs due to vascular permeability, inflammation, and increased portal venous pressure although the exact pathophysiology is not clear identified.7,15

In viral diseases such as hepatitis, viral infiltrations, as well as direct cellular liver damage, are the cause of gallbladder edema. Hepatitis A, a common cause of acute viral disease, causes acute liver failure in 0.5% as well as thickening of the gallbladder wall as an extrahepatic involvement. In our patients, the pathologies that were most confused with acute cholecystitis were liver diseases. In these cases, viral hepatitis was mostly self-limited, but in 12.9%, they received surgical treatment, two presented complications, and one patient presented a severe complication due to 1,500 cc hemoperitoneum.16

In other viral diseases like dengue, it has been reported that in the early stages, capillary plasma leakage occurs, leading to thickening of the gallbladder wall in up to a third of them.17 In our series, dengue cases occurred with a frequency of 32.25% in all of them with thrombocytopenia and the presence of spontaneous hemorrhage, and one patient with dengue hemorrhagic fever and antiphospholipid syndrome died. In these patients, the indication of surgical treatment was not presented, probably due to the high risk of spontaneous hemorrhage induced by severe thrombocytopenia in the initial stage of the disease. In all these patients, gallbladder edema decreased after the initial stage, and indication for surgical treatment was not subsequently presented.

Cardiovascular diseases also occur due to hepatic venous congestion. However, their relationship has not been fully established. In most cases, a relationship between cardiovascular diseases and gallbladder edema has been reported.18 In our series, we only found two patients without surgical treatment in whom acute infarction occurred, one of them died from acute transmural myocardial infarction, and the other patient presented sequel of congestive heart failure. In addition, one of our patients presented fungal pneumonia. This etiology has not been reported as a cause of gallbladder wall thickening until now.

After the statistical analysis, the gallbladder wall thickening was evaluated, and no relation to surgical treatment was found. Regarding this finding, some studies show gallbladder thickening due to edema as a direct indicator of plasma capillary leakage, especially in patients with dengue.17 In this study, the relationship between the wall thickening had no significance with other variables.

In some cases of silent lithiasis, surgical treatment is indicated, which could be the cause of deterioration in these patients. In this series, there was no direct relationship between morbidity and mortality after surgical treatment, but we find statistical significance with the hospital stay in post-surgical patients. In our experience, the indication of cholecystectomy must be very careful when dealing with these types of patients because the most important is the attention of its underlying pathology. More prospective studies are required to increase information in this regard.

Conclusion

In the emergency surgical treatment of patients with suspect cholecystitis, it is mandatory ruled out gallbladder edema secondary to acute diseases. Surgical treatment in patients confused as acute cholecystitis can increase the length of hospital stay.

References

1. Bagla P, Sarria JC, Riall TS. Management of acute cholecystitis. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2016; 29: 508-513. [ Links ]

2. Chawla A, Bosco JI, Lim TC, Srinivasan S, Teh HS, Shenoy JN. Imaging of acute cholecystitis and cholecystitis-associated complications in the emergency setting. Singapore Med J. 2015; 56: 438-443. [ Links ]

3. Tucker L, Tangedahl TN. Manifestations of gallstone disease. Postgrad Med. 1979; 66: 179-180, 183-184. [ Links ]

4. Oppenheimer DC, Rubens DJ. Sonography of Acute Cholecystitis and Its Mimics. Radiol Clin North Am. 2019; 57: 535-548. [ Links ]

5. Tana M, Tana C, Cocco G, Iannetti G, Romano M, Schiavone C. Acute acalculous cholecystitis and cardiovascular disease: a land of confusion. J Ultrasound. 2015; 18: 317-320. [ Links ]

6. Ozeki M, Takeda Y, Morita H, Miyamura M, Sohmiya K, Hoshiga M, et al. Acute cholecystitis mimicking or accompanying cardiovascular disease among Japanese patients hospitalized in a Cardiology Department. BMC Res Notes. 2015; 8: 805. [ Links ]

7. Matsui Y, Hirooka S, Kotsuka M, Yamaki S, Kosaka H, Yamamoto T, et al. Prognosis in Patients With Gallbladder Edema Misdiagnosed as Cholecystitis. JSLS. 2019; 23. [ Links ]

8. Díaz-Martínez J, Chapa-Azuela O, Roldan-García JA, Rangel-Flores G. Bile Duct Injuries after cholecystectomy, analysis of constant risk. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2020; 24: 150-155. [ Links ]

9. Yokoe M, Hata J, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Asbun HJ, Wakabayashi G, et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018; 25: 41-54. [ Links ]

10. Pothapregada S, Kamalakannan B, Thulasingam M. Clinical Profile of Atypical Manifestations of Dengue Fever. Indian J Pediatr. 2016; 83: 493-499. [ Links ]

11. Wright WF, Palisoc K, Pinto CN, Lease JA, Baghli S. Hepatitis C Virus-Associated Acalculous Cholecystitis and Review of the Literature. Clin Med Res. 2020; 18: 33-36. [ Links ]

12. Mazziotti A, Grazi GL, Cavallari A. Gallbladder lithiasis in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Ital Chir. 1998; 69: 719-722. [ Links ]

13. Biagini J. Asymptomatic cholelithiasis. When is a cholecystectomy justified? J Med Liban. 1989; 38: 51-55. [ Links ]

14. Díaz-Martínez J, Merlin-Gallegos A, Perez-Hernandez JL. Large liver abscess and cholecystogastric fistula secondary of emphysematous cholecystitis. Span J Surg Res. 2020; 23: 73-75. [ Links ]

15. Petakovic G, Korica M, Gavrilovic S. Bacteriologic examination of gallbladder contents. Med Pregl. 2002; 55: 225-228. [ Links ]

16. Shin EC, Jeong SH. Natural History, Clinical Manifestations, and Pathogenesis of Hepatitis A. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2018; 8: a031708. [ Links ]

17. Nainggolan L, Wiguna C, Hasan I, Dewiasty E. Gallbladder Wall Thickening for Early Detection of Plasma Leakage in Dengue Infected Adult Patients. Acta Med Indones. 2018; 50: 193-199. [ Links ]

18. Meelu OA, Baber U, Theodoropoulos K, Mennuni MG, Kini AS, Sharma SK. Acute cholecystitis and myocardial infarction: a case study with coronary involvement. Clin Case Rep. 2016; 4: 793-796. [ Links ]

1Ethical considerations: The Local Ethics Committee approved this protocol. Also, it was subjected to specific standards for these types of human studies. It was subjected to the regulations of the General Health Law on health research and with the Declaration of Helsinki, as well as institutional norms and instructions on scientific research.

2Funding: The author declares that he has not received any funding to carry out this work.

3Disclosure: The author declares no conflict of interest.

Received: November 21, 2020; Accepted: July 30, 2021

*Corresponding author: Jair Díaz Martínez. E-mail: diazjairmd@gmail.com

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License