Artículos

 

Acoustic characterization of new species of bats for the State of Oaxaca, Mexico

 

Caracterización acústica de nuevos registros de murciélagos para el estado de Oaxaca, México

 

Miguel Briones-Salas¹*, Mario Peralta-Pérez² and Margarita García-Luis¹

 

¹ Laboratorio de Vertebrados Terrestres (Mastozoología), Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigación para el Desarrollo Integral Regional, Unidad Oaxaca (CIIDIR-OAX), Instituto Politécnico Nacional. Hornos 1003, Santa Cruz Xoxocotlán, Oaxaca, Oaxaca, 71230. E-mail mbriones@ipn.mx (MB-S), ma_ga_lu@hotmail.com (MG-L) *Corresponding autor.

² Licenciatura en Biología, Escuela de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma Benito Juárez de Oaxaca. Avenida Universidad s/n Ex-Hacienda Cinco Señores. Oaxaca, México, 68120. E-mail mariociidir@yahoo.com.mx (MP-P).

 

Sometido: 23 de enero de 2013.
Revisado: 4 de abril de 2013.
Aceptado: 7 de abril de 2013.

 

Abstract

Biodiversity inventories are sometimes biased by the various collection methods applied. In the case of the bats, the acoustic monitoring technique has proven to be complementary to conventional sampling. From July 2007 to June 2008, we studied the composition of a bat community in the southern region of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec, Oaxaca, Mexico. We registered 32 species of bats belonging to six families. Thirteen species of the family Phyllostomidae were captured in mist nets, while three species of the family of Emballonuridae, one species of family Noctilionidae and six of the family Molossidae were recorded by acoustic monitoring. Four species of the family Mormoopidae and five of the Vespertilionidae were registered with both methods. Through acoustic monitoring two new species are added to the 93 already known to the state of Oaxaca: Molossus molossus and M. sinaloae were registered in areas with tropical deciduous forest and gallery vegetation in two areas protected by native communities. These sites protected by local initiatives, turns out to be a good strategy of conservation for bats and other taxonomic groups.

Key words: acousting monitoring, conservation, insectivorous bat, inventory, Tehuantepec Isthmus.

 

Resumen

Los inventarios de la biodiversidad en ocasiones se ven sesgados por los diversos métodos de colecta utilizados. Para el caso de los murciélagos, la técnica de monitoreo acústico ha demostrado ser complementaria a los métodos convencionales de muestreo. De julio de 2007 a junio de 2008, se estudió la composición de la comunidad de murciélagos en la región sur del Istmo de Tehuantepec, Oaxaca, México. Registramos 32 especies de murciélagos que pertenecen a seis familias. Trece especies de la Familia Phyllostomidae se capturaron en redes de niebla, mientras que tres especies de la Familias Emballonuridae, una especie de la Familia Noctilionidae y seis de la familia Molossidae se registraron a través del monitoreo acústico. Las cuatro especies de la Familia Mormoopidae y cinco de la Vespertilionidae se registraron con ambos métodos. A través del monitoreo acústico se suman dos nuevas especies a las 93 ya reconocidas para el estado de Oaxaca: Molossus molossus y M. sinaloae, se registraron en zonas con bosque tropical caducifolio y vegetación de galería dentro de dos áreas naturales protegidas por comunidades indígenas. Estos sitios protegidos por iniciativas locales, resulta ser una buena estrategia de conservación para los murciélagos y otros grupos taxonómicos.

Palabras clave: conservación, insectívoros, inventarios, Istmo de Tehuantepec, monitoreo acústico, murciélagos.

 

Introduction

Oaxaca is one of the states that protect a great amount of the biodiversity in Mexico. Many of its biological groups show a great species richness, among others butterflies, mammals and flowering plants (García-Mendoza 2004; González Pérez et al. 2004). In this biological richness, bats present a highly diverse group. Comprising a total of 200 species of mammals in the state (Briones-Salas and Sánchez-Cordero 2004; Alfaro et al. 2005; Lira-Torres and Sánchez-Cordero 2006; Botello et al. 2007; García-García et al. 2007), 93 species (46.50%) are flying mammals (García-Grajales and Buenrostro 2012). However, the knowledge about this is still incomplete because there are areas difficult to access due to complicated topography and geological origin (Briones-Salas and Sánchez-Cordero 2004; Centeno-García 2004; Ortiz-Perez et al. 2004). Also traditional methods, allow only to register certain groups leaving biological inventories incomplete.

Different studies of bats made in the Neotropic (Fleming et al. 1972; Findley 1993) and in Mexico, particularly (Íñiguez 1993; Medellín 1993; Sosa-Escalante 1997; Chávez and Ceballos 2001; Briones-Salas et al. 2005; Vargas-Contreras et al. 2008) have focused on accounting species richness, by collecting specimens mainly through mist nets, which effectively help only with those species that fly at relatively low altitudes (Tuttle 1976; Kunz and Kurta 1988; Jones et al. 1996; Kunz et al. 1996; Hodgkison et al. 2002). Those flying at high altitudes, however such as the families Emballonuridae and Molossidae, are poorly represented in scientific collections and inventories.

Ultrasonic detectors are equipped for the detection and recording of high frequency ultrasonic sounds emitted by bats (Kunz and Brock 1975; Kunz et al. 1996; O'Farrell and Gannon 1999), and turn out to be an effective tool for obtaining data about the presence, relative abundance and / or activity of insectivorous bats which emit high-intensity calls (Rydell et al. 1999; O'Farrell et al. 1999; Swystun et al. 2001).

Results obtained to date using this method indicate that there are families and even species with vocal signature features that make them easily recognizable in the field. This also emphasizes the need for libraries of sounds that permit the implementation of comparisons with recordings obtained in the field (Fenton 1994; O'Farrell and Miller 1997; Ibáñez et al. 1999; O'Farrell and Miller 1999; Gannon and Sherwin 2002; Rydell et al. 2002; Siles et al. 2003; Waters y Gannon 2002).

The purpose of this paper is to present information on the vocal signatures of the echolocation within the community of insectivorous bats found in a communal area protected in the Tehuantepec Isthmus, Oaxaca, particularly of two new species registered for the state of Oaxaca, as well as corroborating that inventory taken with complementary techniques (nets and acoustic) can provide accurate information to assist the knowledge and conservation of bats in tropical environments.

 

Material and Methods

Study Area. The study took place in a protected communal area called "Zona de uso común Ojo de agua del Cerro Tolistoque", 5 km NW of the Ejido La Venta in the municipality of Juchitán de Zaragoza, in the physiographic subprovince of Planicie Costera de Tehuantepec, in the state of Oaxaca, within the coordinates 16.584311° N and -94.873392° W (Fig. 1; Ortiz Pérez et al. 2004; Ortega et al. 2010).

The terrain is flat, with altitudes averaging 200 m above sea level. The climate is markedly seasonal, with a long dry period. Average monthly temperatures range between 25° C and 29° C and rainfall occurs from June to October. The site has strong gusts of wind from the air masses of the Pacific Ocean during the last and the first months of the year (García 1988; Trejo 2004).

The vegetation on the site is mainly dominated by tropical deciduous forest and thorn scrub, the latter prevails in the area and is characterized by being a habitat with dense thorny closed vegetation, where mainly herbaceous and shrub strata can be observed, some isolated trees are also distinguished in the area (Torres-Colin 2004). Some agricultural plots irrigated by a network of irrigation canals are located a few kilometers south of the study area.

The field work consisted of hanging mist nets from July 2007 to June 2008 as well as acoustic monitoring from January to June of 2008 with four nights visits per month to each site. In each period six mist nets were randomly arranged in different places (12 x 2.5 m) in the flight paths at the edge and within the fragments of vegetation, near streams and in general in places where flying bats were observed.

Bats caught in nets were identified using specialized keys (Álvarez et al. 1994; Medellín et al. 1997). We obtained data on age (young or adult), sex and reproductive status (active: for males when they had their testicles in their scrotum and females when they had large breast development or lactating, vagina open or pregnant; inactive: for males when they had their testicles in their abdomen and females when they had no breast development or closed vagina), later the same night they were released on the same site of capture.

The collection effort was obtained for each sampling period and for the entire year. It was calculated by summing the product of the total number net meters worked (adding those of every night) by the total number of recording hours worked. The sum of the values of each period showed total net meters per hour (mn/h). With this value, we estimate the relative abundance (number of individuals collected) of each species, by dividing the number of animals caught between mn/h. The data are expressed in number of bats per mn/h (Medellín 1993). Some specimens were collected and prepared as a museum specimen, and subsequently deposited in the Colección Mastozoologica (OAX. MA.026.0497) Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigación para el Desarrollo Integral Regional, Unidad Oaxaca (OAXMA).

For acoustic monitoring the Anabat SD1 Bat Detector (Titley Electronics, Ballina, New South Wales, Australia) was used. This device is equipped with a wide range microphone and uses frequency division techniques and Zero-Crossing analysis to make the calls both audible and visible (www.titley-scientific.com; Parson et al. 2000). The Anabat recording equipment has been used extensively in monitoring bats (O'Farrell et al. 1999), in the description of echolocation calls (O'Farrell and Miller 1997) or temporal variation in the activity of bats (Hayes 1997; Gehrt and Chelsvig 2003, 2004; Brooks and Mark 2005; Williams and Perfecto 2011).

The Anabat was placed vertically to a height of 30 cm above the ground in the same sites where mist nets were placed (O'Farrell and Gannon 1999). The height was chosen at low 30 cm to avoid the tripod that supported the detector from toppling in days with strong winds. For six months we used the method of passive monitoring, where we recorded the calls of bats during eight hours starting from sunset. The data were stored on a memory card and later transferred to a computer. All recordings were performed in the absence of rain and avoiding the full moon phase.

The spectrograms of the recordings were visualized with the software Analook © v4.9g as the primary representation of the relationship between the time, measured in milliseconds (ms) and frequency, expressed in kilohertz (kHz). The quantitative measures were obtained from the calls used to discriminate species (Simmons et al. 1979).

In the recordings reference is made to calls which are defined as individual and discrete pulses of which characteristic parameters can be quantified (maximum frequency, minimum frequency and duration) and to a sequence, which is the set of calls from the same species in a single file recorded (O'Farrell et al. 1999; Gannon et al. 2004).

The identification of the calls of the species was done by comparing sequences of previous recordings of individuals released in networks of virtual libraries (http://www.msb.unm.edu/mammals/batcall/) and by checking literature (Barclay 1983; Kalko 1995; O'Farrell 1997; O'Farrell and Miller 1997, 1999; O'Farrell et al. 1999; Fenton et al. 1998; Ibáñez et al. 1999; Ochoa et al. 2000; Granados 2001; Ibáñez et al. 2002).

The qualitative characteristic used in the identification of the species was the form of the signal in the graph and it can be of modulated frecuency (FM, the signals of calls abruptly changes in the frecuency and their duration is short in time), constant frecuency (CF, the calls are located in a narrow bandwidth; Schnitzler and Kalko 2001; Limpens and McCracken 2002). While quantitative characteristics were the maximum frequency (Fmax), defined as the highest frequency of the call, the minimum frequency (Fmin), defined as the lowest frequency of the call, both expressed in kilohertz (kHz) and the duration is the interval of time covered by the call and is expressed in milliseconds (ms) (Gannon et al. 2004). In all cases the combination of qualitative and quantitative features enabled better identification of the species.

 

Results

Capture nets. We worked 368 hours in 46 nights of sampling, with a total of 3,420 meters of net. The nets stayed open for eight hours every night and in average we used 74.35 meters of net per night. The total effort amounted to 27,360 net meter hours (Table 1).

We captured 425 individuals representing three families, 11 genera and 19 species. The best represented family was Phyllostomidae with 13 species and 343 individuals, representing 81% of the total sample. From the family Mormoopidae 76 individuals of three species were captured and lastly the family of Vespertilionidae was collected in lowest number with only five individuals of three species (Table 2).

The species with the highest relative abundance were Artibeus jamaicensis (0.0031) and Pteronotus parnellii (0.0024), three species were rarely captured. Only one specimen of Dermanura phaeotis, Lasiurus blossevillii and Lasiurus intermedius were captured resulting in a low relative abundance of 0.00003 each (Table 2).

Acoustic monitoring. In a total of 22 recording nights, a total of 1,791 recordings could be sampled for analysis. There were 13 species that were not captured in nets corresponding to three embalonurids, a noctilionid, a mormopid, six molossids and two vespertilionids. Five species were recorded by both methods. Of the species M. megalophylla, P. davyi, P. parnellii and M. molossus there were a higher number of sequences (73% of the total analyzed, Table 2).

From the family Emballonuridae 142 sequences were obtained. The form of the call in B. plicata and P. macrotis is similar although the first Fmax is the average of 45.17 kHz, while the second is 38.81 kHz (Fig. 2A, B; Table 2).

Centronycteris centralis is reported for the first time with this technique for the state of Oaxaca, and is the second record for the state, previously was collected in mist nets in the region of Chimalapas, Oaxaca, Mexico (Santos-Moreno et al. 2010). In the identification of this species the form of the call (Fig. 2C) and Fmax which on average is 41.63 kHz were considered. The recordings were made mainly in habitats dominated by grazing land and deciduous tropical forest edges in the communal protected area "Ojo de agua del Cerro Tolistoque".

The closest registration of this species is located approximately at 102 km distance, 35 km NW of Jesus Carranza in Veracruz, Mexico (17.290839°N and -94.726610°W) (Hall, 1981), which corresponds to a humid tropical area, covered by semi-deciduous tropical forest and secondary vegetation. The second closest record is from Cachumbo, 9.7 km NW Santa Maria Chimalapa (16.859171° N and -94.748496° W) in tropical rain forest (Santos-Moreno et al. 2010). This town is located 79.5 Km NE of the recent registration site. The species is subject to special protection (PR) under Mexican law (NOM-059; SEMARNAT 2010).

For the family Noctilionidae only one sequence was obtained. In the identification we considered the form (Fig. 3) and Fmax of 57.14 kHz was also comparable with recorded files from N. leporinus of Huatulco, Oaxaca (Trejo 2011). The recording took place in a gallery vegetation habitat.

The Mormoopidae family provided the greatest number of sequences (73.37%; Table 2). For the identification of P. davyi and P. personatus, the range of Fmax-Fmin was considered as calls of the first species were located on average between 72.96 and 59.64 kHz and the second between 83.72 and 66.75 kHz, about 10 kHz apart (Table 2, Fig. 4A, B). P. parnellii vocalizations were very constant in form and frequency and the latter reaches its maximum value in the long flat part of its calls that was observed on average at 64.73 kHz (Fig. 4C).

The family Molossidae presented 284 recorded sequences (Table 2). The identification of C. mexicanus was based primarily on the form of the spectrograms, where it was possible to identify three patterns, two differing little in its Fmax-Fmin, 27.17-21.15 kHz and 26.45-23.57 kHz respectively, both of search (Fig. 5A, B) and a short one in the approaching phase (called more steep FM, Fig. 5B). In the case of so-called search phase calls, the difference lies in duration, reaching in average 57.32 ms (the longest of all the species), while in approach phase calls are in average 17.41 ms long. Search phase calls were quantified in Table 2 because of their highest usefulness in identifying species.

For identification of T. brasiliensis and N. laticaudatus we considered the form and Fmin that averaged in the search phase to 27.32, 17.67, 12.32 and 15.58 kHz respectively (Table 2). Considering the form of the spectrogram patterns, we differentiated three species of the genus Molossus, which all alternated in the search phase calls with differences in range between Fmax-Fmin of 38.55 - 33.65 kHz in M. molossus of 29.70 - 25.16 kHz in M. rufus and 40.78 - 37.09 kHz in M. sinaloae (Table 2).

Molossus molossus and M. sinaloae represent two new bats species registered for Oaxaca (Fig. 5F, H). For M. molossus a large number of sequences were obtained (fourth in number of recorded sequences, n = 160) throughout the sampling period and in different plant communities as tropical deciduous forest, thorn scrub, secondary vegetation and grazing. The nearest town to the registration site lays 15 mi SW Las Cruces, Chiapas (16.311723° N; -93.845507° W), located at 102 km SE of Ojo de agua del Cerro Tolistoque, Oaxaca (Hall 1981). Although the species is distributed from northern Mexico in Coahuila, Durango and Nuevo Leon to Chiapas in southeastern Mexico (Sánchez-Hernández et al. 1999; Muñiz-Martínez et al. 2003), it had not been registered by any method in the state. Also, García-Grajales and Buenrostro (2012) cited the species; however, when to reviewing the original quotes, the species has not recorded previously in Oaxaca.

For M. sinaloae few sequences were recorded, these were during the months of January, April and May, in habitats corresponding to grazing land and tropical deciduous forest edges near the protected communal area Ojo de agua del Cerro Tolistoque. The closest town to this record corresponds to: Puerto Arista Chiapas, approximately 35 km southeast of Arriaga, Chiapas (15.933889° N and -93.807500° W), with vegetation of tropical dry forests, tropical deciduous forests and agricultural areas, 130 km SE of study site (La Venta). Four individuals of this locality are deposited in the collection of the American Museum of Natural History (AMNH: M249129, M249130, M249131 and M249132).

For the family Vespertilionidae, we obtained a total of 50 sequences (Table 2). For identification of vespertilionids Fmin was considered and subsequently the form. Species of the genus Lasiurus were separated considering their average Fmin. For L. intermedius its Fmin was 29.31 kHz, L. xanthinus 29.91 kHz, finally L. blossevillii was 43.58 kHz. For the first two species, their average Fmin is very similar; the individual values of each of their calls tend, in the case of L. intermedius, to go below 28 kHz, while L. xanthinus are closer to 30 kHz. Additionally, the Fmax of these species show greater differences in average frequency (47.50 kHz vs. 42.34 kHz; Table 2; Fig. 5).

The Fmin and form of the spectrograms were the characteristics considered in the identification of E. fuscus. Their calls were an average of 31.43 kHz Fmin was less than Lasiurus (Fig. 6), this due in part to the bandwidth exhibited in call of E. fuscus: between Fmin and Fmax is a width of 23.76 kHz, while none of the species Lasiurus reaches 20 Khz.

 

Discussion

The total species richness in a particular location may vary and it is usually due to the method or methods used for registration, the time spent for sampling, the extent of the sampled area, and the amount of prior information that the site has as well as the knowledge of the surveying person (Voss and Emmons 1996; Moreno and Halffter 2000). The use of acoustic monitoring allowed detection of 59% of the species known for the region. Previous similar studies have reported percentages ranging from 51% (MacSwiney et al. 2008) to 100% (O'Farrell and Gannon 1999; Siles et al. 2005). We must emphasize the importance of complementary methods in order to have better represented the bat fauna of a particular site.

For the humid tropics this bias has been studied and it is known that using a single method may underestimate the number of species present in a site (Kunz and Kurta 1988; Voss and Emmons 1996; Kalko and Handley 2001; Bernard and Fenton 2002; Hodgkison et al. 2002). This same statement can be applied to dry tropics where the number of species and vespertilionids and molossids flying beyond the height of mist nets is high.

There were species with few registrations from nets such as L. borealis and L. intermedius. A possible explanation for the paucity of registrations of these species of vespertilionids is their flight at high altitude, above the canopy (Kalko et al. 1996), but the acoustic recordings showed the presence of these species in the study area with intermediate values for the number registered calls (n = 20 and 43, respectively). It is also important to mention that there were slight differences in the calls of L. blossevillii to previously register in Belize that showed higher characteristic frequency (Miller 2003).

Thanks to acoustic monitoring two new species were recorded in the state of Oaxaca (M. molossus and M. sinaloae) and one more for the second time (C. centralis), in addition to the 93 previously reported (Briones-Salas and Sánchez-Cordero 2004, Alfaro et al. 2005; García-García et al. 2007), with these new records, the list of bats for Oaxaca increased to 95 species.

Of the species registered in this study we would like to highlight L. yerbabuenae a species considered threatened by the Mexican law (NOM-059; SEMARNAT 2010) and considered as vulnerable by the IUCN. Although their relative abundance was low (0.00018, n = 5, Table 2) there are several registrations of the species in large parts of Oaxaca (Briones-Salas and Sánchez-Cordero 2004). C. centralis is another species that is cataloged under the category of special protection (PR) under Mexican law (NOM 059; SEMARNAT 2010). Of the 18 species recorded with acoustic monitoring, C. centralis was eighth in descending order for the number of known sequences (n = 24, Table 2).

It is worth mentioning that all species in the assemblage of bats were registered within a communal protected area, covered mainly by tropical deciduous forest vegetation with a body of water that gives the name to the area: Ojo de agua del Cerro Tolistoque.

This small lake has permanent running water from the top of Cerro Tolistoque. Possibly the great majority of insectivores species registered during this study prefer this place because of the constant presence of insects, some studies have reported several species of insectivores habits in abundance near rivers and streams (O'Farrell and Miller 1997; Rydell et al. 2002; García 2003; MacSwiney et al. 2006). It is important to mention that community conservation strategies have shown effectiveness in protecting many species of wild mammals in the state of Oaxaca (Duran et al. 2012).

It is important to develop acoustic libraries of the Neotropical region, as suggested by Ochoa et al. (2000), Siles et al. (2003), MacSwiney et al. (2008) that help in the trusted identification of species of bats.

 

Acknowledgements

The manuscript benefited by suggestions from M. C. MacSwiney, Y. del M. Martínez, M. Cortés and M. Lavariega. This study was financed by the Secretaría de Investigación y Posgrado (20080575, 20090672 y 20100263), Instituto Politécnico Nacional and Acciona Energía México, S. de R.L. de C.V. We thank the municipal authorities of the agency of La Venta, Oaxaca, consent and support to work on their land. MB-S was supported by the Comisión de Operación y Fomento a las Actividades Académicas (COFAA). Estímulos al Desempeño Académico (EDI) y el Sistema Nacional de Investigadores (SNI).

 

Literature Cited

Alfaro, A. M., J. L. García-García, and A. Santos-Moreno. 2005. The false vampire bat Vampyrum spectrum in Oaxaca, Mexico. Bat Research News 46:145-146.         [ Links ]

Álvarez, T., T. Álvarez-Castañeda, and J. C. López-Vidal. 1994. Claves para murciélagos mexicanos. Centro de Investigaciones del Noroeste, S.C. y Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas del Instituto Politécnico Nacional. La Paz, México.         [ Links ]

Barclay, R. M. 1983. Echolocation calls of emballonurid bats from Panama. Journal of Comparative Physiology 151:515-520.         [ Links ]

Bernard, E., and M. B. Fenton. 2002. Species diversity of bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) in forest fragments, primary forest, and savannas in central Amazonia, Brazil. Canadian Journal of Zoology 80:1124-1140.         [ Links ]

Botello, F., P. Illoldi-Rangel, M. Linaje, and V. Sánchez-Cordero. 2007. New record of the rock Squirrel (Spermophilus variegatus) in the state of Oaxaca, México. The Southwestern Naturalist 2:326-328.         [ Links ]

Briones-Salas, M., and V. Sánchez-Cordero. 2004. Mamíferos. Pp. 423-447 in Biodiversidad de Oaxaca (García-Mendoza, A. J., M. A. Ordoñez, and M. Briones- Salas, eds). Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México-Fondo Oaxaqueño para la Conservación de la Naturaleza-World Wildlife Fund, Ciudad de México, México.         [ Links ]

Briones-Salas, M., V. Sánchez-Cordero, and A. Santos-Moreno. 2005. Diversidad de murciélagos en un gradiente altitudinal de la Sierra Mazateca, Oaxaca, México. Pp. 67-76 in Contribuciones mastozoológicas en homenaje a Bernardo Villa (Sánchez-Cordero, V., and R. A. Medellín, eds.). Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; CONABIO. Ciudad de México, México.         [ Links ]

Brooks, R. T., and W. Mark Ford. 2005. Bat Activity in a Forest Landscape of Central Massachusetts. Northeastern Naturalist 12:447-462.         [ Links ]

Centeno-García, E. 2004. Configuración geológica del estado. Pp. 349-366 in Biodiversidad de Oaxaca (García-Mendoza, A. J., M. A. Ordoñez, and M. Briones-Salas, eds). Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México -Fondo Oaxaqueño para la Conservación de la Naturaleza-World Wildlife Fund. Ciudad de México, México.         [ Links ]

Chávez, C., and G. Ceballos. 2001. Diversidad y abundancia de murciélagos en selvas secas de estacionalidad contrastante en el oeste de México. Revista Mexicana de Mastozoología 5:27-44.         [ Links ]

Duran, E., J. Robson, M. Briones-Salas, D. Bray, and F. Berkes. 2012. Oaxaca, México: Wildlife conservation on community conserved lands in Oaxaca. Pp. 71-82 in Protected Landscapes and Wild Biodiversity (Dudley, N., and S. Stolton, eds.). International Union for Conservation of Nature, Suiza.         [ Links ]

Fenton, M. B. 1994. Assessing signal variability and reliability: "to thine ownself be true". Animal Behaviour 47:757-764.         [ Links ]

Fenton, M. B., I. L. Rautenbach, J. Rydell, H. T. Arita, J. Ortega, S. Bouchard, L. B. Hovorka, E. Odgren, C. V. Portfors, W. M. Scully, D. M. Syme, and M. J. Vonhof. 1998. Emergence, echolocation, diet and foraging behavior of Molossus ater (Chiroptera: Molossidae). Biotropica 30:314-320.         [ Links ]

Findley, J. S. 1993. Bats a community perspective. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, EE.UU.         [ Links ]

Fleming, T. H., E. T. Hooper, and D. E. Wilson. 1972. Three Central American bat communities: structure, reproductive cycles, and movement patterns. Ecology 53:555-569.         [ Links ]

Gannon, W. L., and R. E. Sherwin. 2004. Are acoustic detectors a 'silver bullet' for assessing habitat use by bats? Pp. 38-45 in Bat echolocation research. Tools, techniques and analisys. (Bringham, R. M., E. K. V. Kalko, G. Jones, S. Parsons, and H. J. G. A. Limpens, eds.). Bat Conservation International y National Fish and Wildlife Foundation. Austin, EE.UU.         [ Links ]

Gannon, W. L., M. J. O'Farrell, C. Corben, and E. J. Bedrick. 2004. Call character lexicon, and analysis of field recorded bat echolocation calls. Pp. 478-486 in Echolocation in bats and dolphins (Thomas, J. A., C. F. Moss, and M. Vater, eds.). University of Chicago Press. Chicago, EE.UU.         [ Links ]

García, E. 1988. Modificación al Sistema de Clasificación Climática de Köppen. Instituto de Geografía, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Ciudad de México, México.         [ Links ]

García, E. M. 2003. Papel ecológico de las aguadas para murciélagos insectívoros en un bosque tropical subhúmedo. Tesis de Maestría. El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, México. Chetumal, México.         [ Links ]

García-García, J., A. Santos-Moreno, A. M. Alfaro, and A. Soto-Centeno. 2007. Noteworthy records of Eptesicus brasiliensis (Vespertilionidae) from Oaxaca, México. Bat Research News 48:5-6.         [ Links ]

García-Grajales, J., and A. Buenrostro. 2012. Revisión al conocimiento de los murciélagos del estado de Oaxaca. Therya 3:277-293.         [ Links ]

García-Mendoza, A. J. 2004. Integración del conocimiento florístico del estado. Pp. 305-325 in Biodiversidad de Oaxaca (García-Mendoza, A. J., M. A. Ordoñez, and M. Briones-Salas, eds). Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México -Fondo Oaxaqueño para la Conservación de la Naturaleza-World Wildlife Fund, Ciudad de México, México.         [ Links ]

Gehrt, S. D., and J. E. Chelsvig. 2003. Bat activity in an urban landscape patterns at the landscape and microhabitat scale. Ecology applications 13:939-950.         [ Links ]

Gehrt, S. D., and J. E. Chelsvig. 2004. Species-specific patterns of bat activity in an urban landscape. Ecology applications 14:625-635.         [ Links ]

González Pérez, G., M. Briones-Salas, and A. M. Alfaro. 2004. Integración del conocimiento faunístico del estado. Pp. 449-466 in Biodiversidad de Oaxaca (García-Mendoza, A. J., M. A. Ordoñez, and M. Briones-Salas, eds). Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México-Fondo Oaxaqueño para la Conservación de la Naturaleza-World Wildlife Fund. Ciudad de México, México.         [ Links ]

Granados, H. J. 2001. Los sonidos de ecolocalización de los murciélagos insectívoros de Yucatán. Tesis de Licenciatura. Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Autónoma de México. Ciudad de México, México.         [ Links ]

Hall, E. R. 1981. The Mammals of North America. John Wiley & Sons, New York, EE.UU.         [ Links ]

Hayes, J. P. 1997. Temporal variation in activity of bats and the design of echolocation monitoring studies. Journal of Mammalogy 78:514-524.         [ Links ]

Hodgkison, R., D. Ahmad, S. Balding, T. Kingston, A. Zubaid, and T. H. Kunz. 2002. Capturing bats (Chiroptera) in tropical forest canopies. Pp. 160-167 in The Global Canopy Programme Handbook: Techniques of Access and Study in the Forest Roof (Mitchell, A. W., K. Secoy, and T. Jackson, eds.). Global Canopy Programme. Oxford, EE.UU.         [ Links ]

Ibáñez, C., A. Guillén, J. Juste, and J. L. Pérez-Jordá. 1999. Echolocation calls of Pteronotus davyi (Chiroptera: Mormoopidae) form Panamá. Journal of Mammalogy 80:924-928.         [ Links ]

Ibáñez, C., J. Juste, R. López-Wilchis, L. Albuja, and A. Núñez-Garduño. 2002. Echolocation of three species of sac-winged bats (Balantiopteryx). Journal of Mammalogy 83:1049-1057.         [ Links ]

Íñiguez, L. I. 1993. Patrones ecológicos en la comunidad de murciélagos de la Sierra de Manantlán. Pp. 355-370 in Avances en el Estudio de los Mamíferos de México (Medellín, R. A., and G. Ceballos, eds.). Publicaciones Especiales, Vol. 1. Asociación Mexicana de Mastozoología, A. C. Ciudad de México, México.         [ Links ]

Jones, C., W. J. McShea, M. J. Conroy, and T. H. Kunz. 1996. Capturing mammals. Pp. 115-155 in Measuring and monitoring biological diversity: standard methods for mammals ( Wilson, D. E., F. Russell, J. D. Nichols, R. Rudran, and M. S. Foster, eds.). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, EE.UU.         [ Links ]

Kalko, E. K. V. 1995. Insect pursuit, prey capture and echolocation in pipistrelle bats (Microchiroptera). Animal Behavior 50:861-880.         [ Links ]

Kalko, E. K. V., and C. O. Handley, Jr. 2001. Neotropical bats in the canopy: diversity, community structure, and implications for conservation. Plant Ecology 153:319-333.         [ Links ]

Kalko, E. K. V., C. O. Handley, and D. Handley. 1996. Organization, diversity, and long term dynamics of a Neotropical bat community. Pp. 503-553 in Long term studies in vertebrate communities (Cody, M., and J. Smallwood, eds.). Academic Press. Los Angeles, EE.UU.         [ Links ]

Kunz, T. H., and C. E. Brock. 1975. A comparison of mist nets and ultrasonic detectors for monitoring flight activity of bats. Journal Mammalogy 56:907-911.         [ Links ]

Kunz, T. H., and A. Kurta. 1988. Capture methods and holding devices. Pp. 1-29 in Ecological and behavioral methods for the study of bats (Kunz, T. H. ed.). Smithsonian Institution Press. Washington, EE.UU.         [ Links ]

Kunz, T. H., D. W. Thomas, G. C. Richards, C. R. Tidemann, E. D. Pierson, and P. A. Racey. 1996. Observational techniques for bats. Pp.105-114 in Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity, Standard Methods for mammals (Wilson, D. E., F. Russell, J. D. Nichols, R. Rudran, and M. S. Foster, eds.). Smithsonian Institution Press. Washington, EE.UU.         [ Links ]

Limpens, H. J. G. A. , and G. F. McCracken. 2002. Choosing a bat detector: theoretical and practical aspects. Pp 28-37 in Bat Echolocation Research. Tools, techniques and analysis (R. M. Brigham, E. K. V. Kalko, G. Jones, S. Parsons, and H. J. G. A. Limpens). Bat Conservation International. Austin, EE.UU.         [ Links ]

Lira-Torres, I., and V. Sánchez-Cordero. 2006. Nuevo registro de Conepatus semistriatus Boddaert, 1784 (Carnívora: Mustelidae) en Oaxaca, México. Acta Zoológica Mexicana (n. s.) 22:119-121.         [ Links ]

MacSwiney, M. C., B. Bolivar, F. M. Clarke, and P. A. Racey. 2006. Nuevos registros de Pteronotus personatus y Cynomops mexicanus (Chiroptera) en el estado de Yucatán, México. Revista Mexicana de Mastozoología 10:102-109.         [ Links ]

MacSwiney, M. C., F. M. Clarke, and P. A. Racey. 2008. What you see is not what you get: the role of ultrasonic detectors in increasing inventory completeness in Neotropical bat assemblages. Journal of Applied Ecology 45:1364-1371.         [ Links ]

Medellín, R. A. 1993. Estructura y diversidad de una comunidad de murciélagos en el trópico húmedo mexicano. Pp. 333-354 in Avances en el estudio de los mamíferos de México (Medellín, R. A., and G. Ceballos, eds.). Asociación Mexicana de Mastozoología A. C. Ciudad de México, México.         [ Links ]

Medellín, R. A., H. T. Arita, and O. Sánchez. 1997. Identificación de los murciélagos de México clave de campo. Asociación Mexicana de Mastozoología, A. C., publicaciones especiales. Ciudad de México, México.         [ Links ]

Miller, B. W. 2003. Community ecology of the non-phyllostomid bats of Northwestern Belize, with a landscape level assessment of the bats of Belize. Tesis de Doctorado. University of Kent at Canterbury. Canterbury, Reino Unido.         [ Links ]

Moreno, C. E., and G. Halffter. 2000. Assessing the completeness of bat biodiversity inventories using species accumulation curves. Journal of Applied Ecology 37:149-158.         [ Links ]

Muñiz-Martínez, R., C. López-González, J. Arroyo-Cabrales, and M. Ortíz. 2003. Noteworthy records of free-tailed bats (Chiroptera: Molossidae) from Durango, Mexico. The Southwestern Naturalist 48:138-144.         [ Links ]

Ochoa, G. J., M. J. O'Farrell, and B. W. Miller. 2000. Contribution of acoustic methods to the study of insectivorous bat diversity in protected areas from northern Venezuela. Acta Chiropterologica 2:171-183.         [ Links ]

O'Farrell, M. J. 1997. Use of echolocation calls for the identification of free-flying bats. Transactions of the Western Section of the Wildlife Society 33:1-8.         [ Links ]

O'Farrell, M. J., and W. L. Gannon. 1999. A comparison of acoustic versus capture techniques for inventory of bats. Journal of Mammalogy 80:24-30.         [ Links ]

O'Farrell, M. J., and B. W. Miller. 1997. A new examination of echolocation calls of some Neotropical bats (Emballonuridae and Mormoopidae). Journal of Mammalogy 78:954-963.         [ Links ]

O'Farrell, M. J., and B. W. Miller. 1999. Use of vocal signatures for the inventory of free-flying neotropical bats. Biotropica 31:507-516.         [ Links ]

O'Farrell, M. J., B. W. Miller, and W. L. Gannon. 1999. Qualitative identification of free-flying bats using the anabat detector. Journal of Mammalogy 80:11-23.         [ Links ]

Olguin, H., L. León, U. Samper-Palacios and V. Sánchez-Cordero. 2008. Mastofauna de la región de los Chimalapas, Oaxaca, México. Pp. 165-216 in Avances en el estudio de los mamíferos de México (C. Lorenzo, E. Espinoza, and J. Ortega, eds.). Publicaciones especiales, Vol. II. Asociación Mexicana de Mastozoología A. C. Ciudad de México, México.         [ Links ]

Ortega, D., G. Sánchez, C. Solano, M. A. Huerta, V. Meza, and C. Galindo-Leal. 2010. Áreas de conservación certificadas en el estado de Oaxaca. World Wildlife Fund, Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas-Secretaría del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales. Oaxaca, México.         [ Links ]

Ortiz Perez, M. A., J. R. Hernández, and J. M. Figueroa Mah-Eng. 2004. Reconocimiento fisiográfico y geomorfológico. Pp. 43-54 in Biodiversidad de Oaxaca (García-Mendoza, A. J., M. A. Ordoñez. and M. Briones-Salas, eds). Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México -Fondo Oaxaqueño para la Conservación de la Naturaleza-World Wildlife Fund. Ciudad de México, México.         [ Links ]

Parsons, S., A. M. Boonman, and M. K. Obrist. 2000. Advantages and disadvantages of techniques for transforming and analizing chiropteran echolocation calls. Journal of Mammalogy 81:927-938.         [ Links ]

Rydell, J., H. T. Arita, M. Santos, and J. Granados. 2002. Acoustic identification of insectivorous bats (order Chiroptera) of Yucatan, México. Journal of Zoology 257:27-36.         [ Links ]

Rydell, J., L. A. Miller, and M. E. Jensen. 1999. Echolocation constraints of Daubenton's bat foraging over water. Functional Ecology 13:247-255.         [ Links ]

Sánchez-Hernández, C., M. L. Roméro-Almaraz, R. Owen, A. Núñez-Garduño, and R. López-Wilchis. 1999. Noteworthy records of mammals from Michoacán, México. The Southwestern Naturalist 44:231-235.         [ Links ]

Santos-Moreno, A., S. García, and E. Pérez. 2010. Records of bats from Oaxaca, México. Southwestern Naturalist 55:454-456.         [ Links ]

Schnitzler, H.-U., and E. K. V. Kalko. 2001. Echolocation by insect-eating bats. BioScience 51: 557-569.         [ Links ]

SEMARNAT. 2010. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-059-ECOL-2010. Protección ambiental, especies de flora y fauna silvestres de México, categorías de riesgo y especificaciones para su inclusión, exclusión o cambio, y lista de especies en riesgo. Diario Oficial de la Federación, Jueves 30 de diciembre de 2010. Ciudad de México, México.         [ Links ]

Siles, L., D. Peñaranda, J. C. Pérez-Zubieta, and K. Barboza. 2005. Los murciélagos de la ciudad de Cochabamba. Revista Boliviana de Ecología y Conservación Ambiental 18:51-64.         [ Links ]

Siles, L., N. Rocha, A. Selaya, and L. Acosta. 2003. Comunidad de murciélagos en el Parque Nacional Kaa Iya del Gran Chaco y su conservación. Andira 3:1-3.         [ Links ]

Simmons, J. A., M. B. Fenton, and M. J. O'Farrell. 1979. Echolocation and pursuit of prey by bats. Science 203:16-21.         [ Links ]

Sosa-Escalante, J. 1997. Ecología de la comunidad de mamíferos del noreste de la península de Yucatán. Tesis de Maestría. Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Ciudad de México, México.         [ Links ]

Swystun, M. B., J. M. Psyllakis, and R. M. Brigham. 2001. The influence of residual tree patch isolation on habitat use by bats in central British Columbia. Acta Chiropterologica 3:197-201.         [ Links ]

Torres-Colín, R. 2004. Tipos de vegetación. Pp.105-117 in Biodiversidad de Oaxaca (García-Mendoza, A. J., M. A. Ordoñez, and M. Briones-Salas, eds.). Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México -Fondo Oaxaqueño para la Conservación de la Naturaleza-World Wildlife Fund. Ciudad de México, México.         [ Links ]

Trejo, A. 2011. Caracterización acústica de los murciélagos insectívoros del Parque Nacional Huatulco, Oaxaca. Tesis de Maestría. Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigación para el Desarrollo Integral Regional, Instituto Politécnico Nacional. Oaxaca, México.         [ Links ]

Trejo, I. 2004. Clima. Pp. 67-85 in Biodiversidad de Oaxaca (García-Mendoza, A. J., M. A. Ordoñez, and M. Briones-Salas, eds.). Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México -Fondo Oaxaqueño para la Conservación de la Naturaleza-World Wildlife Fund. Ciudad de México, México.         [ Links ]

Tuttle, M. D. 1976. Population ecology of the gray bat (Myotis grisescens): factors influencing growth and survival of newly volant young. Ecology 57:587-595.         [ Links ]

Vargas-Contreras, J., G. Escalona-Segura, J. D. Cú-Vizcarra, J. Arroyo-Cabrales, and R. Medellín. 2008. Estructura y diversidad de los ensambles de murciélagos en el centro y sur de Campeche, México. Pp. 551-577 in Avances en el estudio de los mamíferos de México II (Lorenzo, C., E. Espinoza, and Ortega, eds.). Asociación Mexicana de Mastozoología, A. C. Ciudad de México, México.         [ Links ]

Voss, R. S., and L. H. Emmons. 1996. Mammalian diversity in Neotropical lowland rainforest: a preliminary assessment. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 230:1-115.         [ Links ]

Waters, D. A., and W. L. Gannon. 2002. Bat call libraries: management and potential use. Pp. 150-156 in Bat echolocation research. Tools, techniques and analisys (Bringham, R. M., E. K. V. Kalko, G. Jones, S. Parsons, and H. J. Limpens, eds.). Bat Conservation International y National Fish and Wildlife Foundation.         [ Links ]

Williams, G., and I. Perfecto. 2011. Ensemble composition and activity levels of insectivorous bats in response to management intensification in coffee agroforestry systems. PLoS ONE 6:1-10.         [ Links ]

 

Notas:

Editor asociado: Patricia Cortés-Calva.

Diseño gráfico editorial: Gerardo Hernández.