SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.21 suppl.1Melanoma maligno gigante en localización inusual con criterios de mal pronóstico: reporte de casoSarcoma pleomórfico del yeyuno: reporte de caso índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Gaceta mexicana de oncología

versión On-line ISSN 2565-005Xversión impresa ISSN 1665-9201

Gac. mex. oncol. vol.21  supl.1 Ciudad de México jul. 2022  Epub 11-Sep-2023

https://doi.org/10.24875/j.gamo.22000078 

Clinical cases

Myoepithelial carcinoma: A case report of a rare pathology of the maxillary sinus

Carcinoma mioepitelial: un reporte de caso de una patología poco frecuente del seno maxilar

Ana Rivera García-Granados1  * 

Daniel Kajomovitz-Bialostozky2 

Marco A. Urbina-Velázquez1 

1General Surgery Service

2Oncologic Surgery Service. Centro Médico ABC, Mexico City, Mexico


Abstract

Myoepithelial carcinoma represents only 0.1-0.45% of salivary gland tumors, the palate being the most common location. We present a case of myoepithelial carcinoma of the minor salivary glands in the maxilla; this entity is so rare that only six cases have been reported in the literature – a 64-year-old female with progressive pain and swelling of the maxilla. A biopsy was made, and myoepithelial carcinoma was diagnosed. A left infrastructural maxillectomy was performed, and the tumor was resected entirely. The patient received adjuvant radiotherapy with 60 Gy. 1-year surveillance revealed no local or systemic recurrence.

Keywords Myoepithelioma; Myoepithelial carcinoma; Salivary gland; Maxillary sinus

Resumen

El carcinoma mioepitelial representa únicamente el 0.1-0.45% de los tumores de glándulas salivales, siendo el paladar el sitio más común de localización. Presentamos un caso de carcinoma mioepitelial de glándulas salivales menores en el seno maxilar; esta entidad es tan rara que únicamente se han presentado seis casos en la literatura. Mujer de 64 años, con dolor y edema progresivo de la maxila es diagnosticada con carcinoma mioepitelial por medio de biopsia. Se le realizó una maxilectomía infraestructural, con resección R0 del tumor. Posteriormente se le administró radioterapia adyuvante con 60 Gy. Un año después, la paciente no ha presentado recurrencia.

Palabras clave Mioepitelioma; Carcinoma mioepitelial; Glándula salival; Seno maxilar

Introduction

The salivary glands are divided into two groups, the major salivary glands, which include parotid, submandibular, and sublingual glands, and the minor found in the aerodigestive tract. There are between 600 and 1000 minor salivary glands that measure between 1 and 5 mm in diameter; they are found in greater concentration in the oral cavity and oropharynx and less in the nose, paranasal sinuses, pharynx, and larynx. Salivary gland tumors are usually benign, and most of them occur in major salivary glands. Myoepithelial carcinoma is a rare tumor in the salivary glands, most of them are benign. Hereford, we present a rare case of malignant myoepithelial carcinoma located in the maxillary sinus.

Case report

A 64-year-old female with a medical history of resection of a hard palate tumor 30 years ago, apparently benign, presents to the clinic with an 8-month history of progressive pain and swelling of the left maxilla, attributed to a dental prosthesis, receiving antibiotic treatment. Extraction of the upper left premolar is done without improvement. Subsequently, an increase in the upper left gingiva volume was noticed, biopsied, and an odontogenic tumor was reported. Examination revealed a bulging of the left hard palate and an increase in the upper gingiva volume of approximately 5 × 5 cm (Fig. 1). No lymphadenopathy was palpated.

Figure 1 The patient presented with bulging of the left hard palate, associated with pain. 

A face CT scan revealed a heterogeneous left maxillary tumor with bone destruction, which measured 34 × 28 mm, extending into surrounding soft tissue and masticator space, with an invasion of the hard and soft palate (Fig. 2). No adenopathy was identified. A left infrastructural maxillectomy was performed. The tumor was resected entirely, a solid tumor was identified, measuring approximately 4 × 4 cm, with intimate contact with the orbit floor, without infiltrating it. Furthermore, infiltration to the hard palate, up to the midline, was observed (Fig. 3 A, B, C). The post-operative period was uneventful, and she was discharged on post-operative day 4. Final histopathological examination reported a myoepithelial maxillary carcinoma. Immunohistochemical staining revealed positive for S100, calponin, and P63 negative. Adjuvant radiotherapy, with 60 Gy, was administered.

Figure 2 CT scan of the head revealing a heterogeneous left maxillary tumor, with bone destruction, extending into surrounding soft tissue. 

Figure 3 A: intraoperative photo of the maxillary tumor, with intimate contact to the orbit floor. B: surgical specimen – infrastructural maxillectomy. Solid tumor measuring 4 × 4 cm. C: immediate post-operative photo of the reconstruction post-infrastructural maxillectomy. 

Discussion

The salivary glands are divided into two groups, the major salivary glands, which include parotid, submandibular, and sublingual glands, and the minor found in the aerodigestive tract. There are between 600 and 1000 minor salivary glands that measure between 1 and 5 mm in diameter; they are found in greater concentration in the oral cavity and oropharynx and less in the nose, paranasal sinuses, pharynx, and larynx. These originate from the ectoderm of the upper respiratory tract around the 12th week of gestation. The glands are made up of parenchyma, with secretory units and associated ducts, and connective tissue stroma that divides the glandules into lobules. These are exocrine glands secreting saliva from their acinus toward the epithelial surface. The myoepithelial cells surround the acinus, and its contraction triggers the secretion of saliva into the epithelium1.

Salivary gland tumors are rare and primarily benign; only about 20% are malignant. The annual incidence of salivary gland cancer is 0.5-2/100,000. Although these tumors can occur in major or minor salivary glands, most of them occur in major salivary glands. It is considered that the smaller the salivary gland in which the tumor occurs, the more likely it is to be malignant2. Up to 80% of tumors in minor salivary glands are malignant, while only 25% of those are in the parotid gland1. In general, minor salivary gland tumors appear as submucosal tumors, which later ulcerate; since most of these are found in the oral cavity. Data suggestive of malignancy include nerve involvement, which can be evident with facial palsy, accelerated growth, fixation to deep tissue, and cervical lymphadenopathy2.

Minor salivary glands cancer represents 2-4% of all head-and-neck cancer and 10-15% of all salivary glands neoplasms1. The most common type of cancer in the minor salivary glands is adenoid cystic carcinoma followed by mucoepidermoid carcinoma2. Myoepithelioma is a rare tumor, representing 1% of all salivary gland tumors; 90% are benign3,4. The malignant variant represents only 0.1-0.45% of salivary gland neoplasms3. Myoepithelial carcinoma is not exclusive of salivary glands, it can also arise from skin and soft tissue. About 15% of these tumors arise in minor salivary glands5. This neoplasm was first described by Yang et al. in 1975 and was included as a separate clinicopathological entity by the World Health Organization in 19916. It occurs more frequently in adults over 50 years of age, without an apparent gender predilection; although a recent systematic review reports a higher frequency in females3,5,7. In general, they are solid tumors, measuring from 2 to 10 cm, firm, nodular; necrosis or cystic degeneration areas may be present1. The most common location is in the palate6. Microscopically, it has infiltrative, destructive growth into the adjacent salivary gland and soft tissues. The nodules of tumor cells are usually separated by fibrous stroma. Four types of cells can be found in myoepithelioma; usually, more than 1 type is found, including epithelioid, plasmacytoid, spindle cells, and clear cells1. The most frequently found cell is the epithelioid followed by clear cells6. It is designated as a cell type when more than 75% of the tumor cells are one type. Myoepithelial carcinomas may arise from pre-existing benign lesions or occur de novo. In a study made by Savera et al., with 25 patients, it was determined that 75% of the cases were de novo, while 25% of the tumors arise from benign tumors7. Myoepithelial carcinoma that arises from benign lesions is generally low grade, while de novo is generally high3.

The diagnosis is made by confirming exclusive myoepithelial differentiation and evidence of malignancy – infiltrative growth and perineural invasion6,7. Atypia may or may not be present7. Myoepithelial differentiation is not uncommon; however, tumors that are formed only by myoepithelial cells are rare3,7. The distinction of malignancy may be difficult; the presence of atypia, cellular pleomorphism, >7 mitotic figures per 10 high-power fields, necrosis, and invasive patterns are some features that determine malignancy3. Immunohistochemical markers are used to distinguish from other neoplasms. The markers that have the best sensitivity are S100 and vimentin, although others have also been used, such as calponin, p63, CD10, and anti-keratin antibodies6,7. More than 10% of positive Ki-67 is diagnostic for malignancy3,6.

When a salivary gland tumor is suspected, radiological investigations may be employed to delineate tumor location. Ultrasound is used for parotid and submandibular glands, but it is not helpful for minor salivary gland tumors. Magnetic resonance (MR) is considered more valuable than computerized tomography in predicting malignancy and detecting small tumors, for they have an intermediate to low signal in MR. It is also better in detecting extension, marrow infiltration, and perineural spread. The use of PET scans is still being evaluated. As mentioned before, the diagnosis is confirmed by histopathological examination. Fine-needle aspiration cytology has a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 99%2.

A myoepithelial carcinoma usually presents as a slow-growing, painless mass3. These symptoms may be associated with surface ulceration and bleeding6. Infiltration to adjacent tissues may cause facial palsy, lip or lingual numbness, dysphagia, and pain, depending on the location. Malignant lesions are more likely to be symptomatic than benign ones. Lymph node involvement may be present. Since it is an uncommon tumor, the prognostic factors are still under investigation. Some potential prognostic factors include clinical stage, site, and size of the tumor, proliferative activity, and invasion into the surrounding tissue. Although no definite histopathological feature correlates with tumor behavior3,7, it has been seen that overexpression of Ki-67 and p53 confers poor prognosis since recurrence and metastasis are more frequent3. Spindle cell subtype has an increased risk of lymphatic and distant metastasis. It is not unusual that this disease's metastasis presents years later, with reports up to 43 years after initial diagnosis3. Spreads to lungs, spine, brain, skin, kidney, ribs, scalp, and bone marrow have been reported3,6.

There is minimal experience in treating this disease; there are currently no guidelines to guide the treatment. Surgery is the mainstay of MC's management3,6, with wide surgical margins in more aggressive tumors3. Neck dissection should only be done if there is proven cervical lymph node involvement6. Adjuvant radiotherapy is currently under investigation: a recent systematic review reports less locoregional recurrence, but no impact in overall survival5. It is generally recommended for high-grade tumors and incomplete resection, perineural invasion or soft-tissue infiltration. It is also recommended for recurrence after complete surgical resection3,6.

Prognosis is given by the complete surgical resection, which is the only curative treatment6. Tumor size and mitotic index have also been seen to affect recurrence5. Tumors with p63 and Ki67 overexpression have also presented recurrence and metastasis more frequently8. In the present case, p63 was negative, while Ki67 and p53 were not determined. We can imply that the patient has a good prognosis.

Six cases, including this one, have been reported in the literature (Table 1). All of these cases had exclusive myoepithelial differentiation. About 50% were women, between the ages of 38 and 67, with an average of 50 years. Most of them presented with dull pain and swelling in the cheek. All of them underwent surgical resection. Three of them presented recurrence, one of which died9, but we have no information on the other two patients10,11. Only one patient received chemotherapy9 and three radiotherapy4,9.

Table 1 Myoepithelial carcinoma case reports 

Author Age Gender Clinical presentation Treatment Recurrence Treatment of recurrence Outcome
Hata et al. 47 F Cheek swelling and pain Surgical resection Yes RT Survival
Zhou et al. 41 F Nasal obstruction Surgical resection + Chemotherapy Yes RT Death
Albergoni et al. 44 M Facial asymmetry Surgical resection - - -
van Roggen et al. 67 M Cheek pain Surgical resection - - -
Savera et al. 38 M - Surgical resection Yes Death
Present case 64 F Swelling and pain Surgical resection + RT No - Survival

Myoepithelial carcinoma is a rare entity that affects salivary glands. The vast majority of them arise in major salivary glands and are usually de novo. It is crucial to know de histopathological and immunohistochemical features to diagnose this disease accurately. The treatment is surgical excision, with wide margins. Prognosis is determined by this and by histopathological features. Radiotherapy is under investigation, but it does not seem to improve prognosis significantly. Only six cases, including this one, have been reported in the literature; half of them are female, and also, half of them presented recurrence.

It is essential to correctly identify and treat this disease to improve the prognosis.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the ABC medical center staffs for supporting the writing of this article. We would also like to thank the patient and her family for allowing us to report this case.

References

1. Myers EN, Ferris RL. Salivary Gland Disorders. New York:Springer;2011. [ Links ]

2. To VS, Chan JY, Tsang RK, Wei WI. Review of salivary gland neoplasms. ISRN Otolaryngol. 2012;2012:872982. [ Links ]

3. Vilar-González S, Bradley K, Rico-Pérez J, Vogiatzis P, Golka D, Nigam A, et al. Salivary gland myoepithelial carcinoma. Clin Transl Oncol. 2015;17:847-55. [ Links ]

4. Hata M, Tokuuye K, Shioyama Y, Nomoto S, Inadome Y, Fukumitsu N, et al. Malignant myoepithelioma in the maxillary sinus:case report and review of the literature. Anticancer Res. 2009;29:497-501. [ Links ]

5. Giridhar P, Gupta P, Mallick S, Upadhyay AD, Rath GK. Impact of adjuvant therapy on survival in patients with myoepithelial carcinoma:a systematic review and individual patient data analysis of 691 patients. Radiother Oncol. 2019;140:125-30. [ Links ]

6. Yang S, Li L, Zeng M, Zhu X, Zhang J, Chen X. Myoepithelial carcinoma of intraoral minor salivary glands:a clinicopathological study of 7 cases and review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;110:85-93. [ Links ]

7. Savera AT, Sloman A, Huvos AG, Klimstra DS. Myoepithelial carcinoma of the salivary glands:a clinicopathologic study of 25 patients. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000;24:761-74. [ Links ]

8. Jiang YH, Cheng B, Ge MH, Zhang G. The prognostic significance of p63 and Ki-67 expression in myoepithelial carcinoma. Head Neck Oncol. 2012;4:9. [ Links ]

9. Zhou SH, Ruan LX, Gong L, Wang SQ. Primary malignant myoepithelioma of the left maxillary sinus:a case report. J Int Med Res. 2008;36:362-5. [ Links ]

10. Silveira HA, Almeida LY, Nonaka CF, Alves PM, Ribeiro-Silva A, León JE. Myoepithelial carcinoma with rhabdoid features in the maxillary sinus:immunohistochemical and in situ hybridization analysis of a rare case. Oral Oncol. 2019;93:116-9. [ Links ]

11. Graadt van Roggen JF, Baatenberg-de Jong RJ, Verschuur HP, Balhuizen JC, Slootweg PJ, van Krieken JH. Myoepithelial carcinoma (malignant myoepithelioma):first report of an occurrence in the maxillary sinus. Histopathology. 1998;32:239-41. [ Links ]

FundingThis research has not received any specific grant from public, commercial, or for-profit sector agencies.

Ethical disclosures

Protection of human and animal subjects. The authors declare that no experiments were performed on humans or animals for this study.

Confidentiality of data. The authors declare that they have followed the protocols of their work center on the publication of patient data.

Right to privacy and informed consent. The authors have obtained the written informed consent of the patients or subjects mentioned in the article. The corresponding author is in possession of this document.

Received: September 13, 2021; Accepted: January 06, 2022

* Correspondence: Ana Rivera García-Granados E-mail: arivera.gg@gmail.com

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Creative Commons License Sociedad Mexicana de Oncología. Published by Permanyer. This is an open ccess article under the CC BY-NC-ND license